Newsletter Subject

Weekly Briefing: Star scholar accused of research fraud sues Harvard and three bloggers

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Sat, Aug 5, 2023 12:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Francesca Gino's lawsuit says the university and professors defamed her. ADVERTISEMENT You can also

Francesca Gino's lawsuit says the university and professors defamed her. ADVERTISEMENT [Weekly Briefing Logo]( You can also [read this newsletter on the web](. Or, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, [unsubscribe](. Scholar’s lawsuit accuses Harvard, bloggers of defamation Francesca Gino (above) filed a $25-million defamation suit this week against Harvard University and three scholars who accused her of fabricating research data. Gino, a professor at Harvard’s business school, rose to prominence for her research on dishonesty in leadership and workplace behavior. [In her lawsuit,]( filed on Wednesday in the U.S. district court in Massachusetts, Gino denies that she falsified data. She says Data Colada, a blog by three business-school professors who have written about her research, made erroneous accusations about her work. The [lawsuit]( calls the statements on Data Colada “false and defamatory.” As for Harvard, she accuses the institution of not producing substantial evidence that she committed research misconduct, and her suit calls the sanctions the institution placed against her, including unpaid leave, “unwarranted and excessive.” Gino says she was placed on administrative leave on June 13, for two years. The leave bars her from campus and eliminates her teaching duties, research work, student mentorship, and titled professorship, according to her lawsuit. The lawsuit adds that the allegations have marked her career and delayed a book deal. “I want to be very clear: I have never, ever falsified data or engaged in research misconduct of any kind,” Gino said in a [statement]( on LinkedIn. In June, The Chronicle reported that Gino was [on administrative leave]( after an investigation that Harvard had been conducting into her research. Data Colada then [published a series of blog posts]( that they called “evidence of fraud” in four of her studies. The bloggers also wrote that they believed that these were not isolated incidents. They identified problems like original data sets that didn’t match published sets and problems with how the data was sorted. It’s worth noting that two of Gino’s papers mentioned in the Data Colada posts have been retracted, and a [third retraction]( is forthcoming. A fourth paper was retracted in 2021 because of a separate instance of data fabrication. Gino’s lawsuit also takes issue with Harvard’s timing of its investigation. She first learned about the allegations in October 2021 from Harvard Business School’s research-integrity officer and that Harvard was investigating in April 2022, according to the lawsuit. In her lawsuit, she accuses Harvard of not giving her enough time to review and respond to the draft findings. She said she was given three weeks to review the material when she was going on a two-week trip to Italy. Gino also said in her lawsuit that she wasn’t allowed to see the documentation from a forensics firm hired by Harvard. And on June 13 this year, the Harvard Business School dean told her that he would accept the panel’s conclusions, according to her lawsuit. The lawsuit states that Harvard found Gino committed misconduct based on the institution’s “inconclusive” observation of discrepancies and “speculation.” The Harvard policy at the time said that the investigative committee needed to prove that she “‘intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly’ falsified or fabricated data” to prove research misconduct, according to the lawsuit. A Harvard spokesperson declined to comment when contacted by The Chronicle. The Data Colada authors also declined to comment, adding that they had not read the lawsuit as of Wednesday afternoon. [Read our Stephanie M. Lee’s full story here](. ADVERTISEMENT NEWSLETTER [Sign Up for the Teaching Newsletter]( Find insights to improve teaching and learning across your campus. Delivered on Thursdays. To read this newsletter as soon as it sends, [sign up]( to receive it in your email inbox. Lagniappe - Read. This profile of Allie Beth Allman, the queen of Dallas luxury real estate, is about a woman who stumbled into her profession and ended up dominating it, and it’s a story American real estate. Even if you don’t live in or are not from the Dallas area (I’m not), [the story is a detailed look at real-estate changes in America](. (Texas Monthly) - Listen. There’s a rumor that airplane coffee isn’t brewed with the cleanest water. Is it true? [This podcast episode investigates](. (Search Engine podcast) - Watch. The TV show Reservation Dogs is back for its [third and final season]( on Hulu. The coming-of-age comedy follows teenage friends living on a reservation in Oklahoma, but this season picks up with the gang on a trip to California. (NPR) —Fernanda SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to essential news, analysis, and advice. Chronicle Top Reads DATA [How Much Are Public-College Presidents Paid?]( [STORY IMAGE]( Base pay, bonuses, and benefits for 195 chief executives at public doctoral universities and systems in 2022. SPONSOR CONTENT | Florida International University [Producing Top Engineers With No End in Sight]( Florida International University is the top producer of minority engineers and computer scientists in the country, but why stop there? CURRICULA [Scared of AI? Don’t Be, Computer-Science Instructors Say.]( By Maggie Hicks [STORY IMAGE]( The discipline offers a potential model for integrating ChatGPT and other artificial-intelligence tools into the curriculum. ADMISSIONS [An Early Peek at How Admission Applications Are Changing After the Supreme Court Ruling]( By Eric Hoover [STORY IMAGE]( Some colleges are adjusting their essay prompts — boldly or subtly. ADVERTISEMENT FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [Restructuring a University - The Chronicle Store]( [Restructuring a University]( In 2022, Henderson State University declared financial exigency after realizing it could no longer avoid hard choices. This case study of the university’s path to near-ruin highlights lessons for any college leader contemplating a restructuring to keep an institution viable. [Order your copy]( to learn about key factors to consider in a restructuring process. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2023 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.