The Review: The Stanford Law Debacle

Student activists shoot themselves in the foot. ADVERTISEMENT [The Review Logo]( Did someone forward you this newsletter? [Sign up free]( to receive your own copy. You can now read The Chronicle on [Apple News]( [Flipboard]( and [Google News](. You have probably heard by now about Fifth Circuit appellate Judge Kyle Duncan’s disastrous visit to Stanford Law School, at the invitation of the Federalist Society. If not, check out David Lat’s characteristically comprehensive and even-handed [account]( which covers both the incident itself and its afterlife as a media event. The short version: Duncan came; he was heckled; he gave as good as he got, which didn’t quiet the hecklers. Tirien Steinbach, Stanford Law’s associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion, eventually intervened, but in doing so she expressed fulsome sympathy for the protestors. Duncan then skipped his prepared remarks and moved straight to an adversarial question-and-answer period. Later, Stanford University president Marc Tessier-Lavigne and law-school dean Jenny S. Martinez sent a letter to Duncan apologizing both for the protest itself and for Steinbach’s “inappropriate” handling of it. Conservative commentators enjoyed themselves. “The law-school rabble evinced learned behavior: No one is born feeling entitled to insult and silence others. Where did the privileged boors learn this?” George Will asked. (His unconvincing answer: too much praise from parents when young.) Liberals like Mark Joseph Stern in Slate and Elie Mystal in The Nation took the conservative glee over the incident as an element in a larger conspiracy. “A Trump Judge’s Tantrum at Stanford Law Was Part of a Bigger Plan,” as the headline to Stern’s [essay]( put it. Mystal [spells out]( the thinking: “The entire escapade sure seems like a set-up. Duncan went into a hostile environment spoiling for a fight, got one, videotaped it, and then ran to his media spokes-buddies to cast himself as a victim.” Mystal buttresses this speculation with a theory of free speech that justifies the heckler’s veto: Federalist Society sycophants ... did their old song and dance about free speech (for conservatives, not the protesters) and civility (toward conservatives, not the marginalized people conservatives hate). As is usual, they collapsed the difference between the right to appear at Stanford and the right to force Stanford students to sit there like docile automatons while Duncan held forth. Everybody has the right to speak; nobody has the right to be heard over the din of the crowd. But the conservative echosphere pretends not to understand this distinction. NEWSLETTER [Sign Up for the Teaching Newsletter]( Find insights to improve teaching and learning across your campus. Delivered on Thursdays. To read this newsletter as soon as it sends, [sign up]( to receive it in your email inbox. In fact, as Tessier-Lavigne and Martinez reiterated in their apology to Duncan, invited speakers at Stanford Law do have a right to be heard over the din of the crowd. Nor does Mystal even glance at the obvious objections to his argument (if right-wing protestors shouted down, say, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, would she have a right to be heard over the din of the crowd?) But with a little work, you can extract a semi-coherent theory of free speech from these columns (the Mystal-Stern theory?). It would go something like this: The heckler’s veto is permissible if and only if a speaker has been invited primarily to irritate or provoke, rather than to argue in good faith. It’d be hard to work out. The difference between argument and mere provocation is problematic. And the motivations behind any given invitation are not transparent, and may be mixed. In any event, law students inviting a federal appellate judge, no matter his opinions, does not strike me as all that analogous to an invitation to, say, Milo Yiannopoulos. But forget principles. Is it good politics? Let’s say Mystal and company are right — that the invitation was a deliberate act of provocation meant to arouse precisely the response it did arouse from activists. What do the activists achieve by behaving as expected? As Yale Law’s Samuel Moyn [tweeted]( after the Stanford news broke, “The campus left hands another win to the national right — without learning that principle and strategy do not unerringly align.” ADVERTISEMENT SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to essential news, analysis, and advice. The Latest THE REVIEW | OPINION [Down and Out at the AHA]( By Jacob Bruggeman [STORY IMAGE]( History is facing a jobs crisis. Why doesn’t the field talk about it more? ADVERTISEMENT THE REVIEW | ESSAY [When Mentors Fail Us]( By Rachel Adams [STORY IMAGE]( Sometimes these relationships fade. But not always. THE REVIEW | OPINION [The Lost Art of Academic Conversation]( By Paula Marantz Cohen [STORY IMAGE]( Faculty members no longer have time to indulge in the free play of ideas. THE REVIEW | OPINION [DEI Goals Are Worthy. Campus DEI Bureaucracies Fail Them.]( By Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Aaron Snyder [STORY IMAGE]( Anyone and everyone can deploy the “harm” rationale to curtail academic freedom. Recommended - “I’m busy doing my science … and then I just stop and cry.” That’s biologist Bonnie Baxter on the disappearance of the Great Salt Lake, in a [short video essay]( by Dane Christensen in Aeon. - Also in Aeon, an amusing video essay by Evan Puschak on the Earl of Elgin’s [pilfering of the Parthenon Marbles](. - “The cat is to Joan Brown as the bull is to Picasso.” In the New York Review of Books, Regina Marler on the Bay Area artist [Joan Brown,]( whose work is the subject of a show at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Write to me at len.gutkin@chronicle.com. Yours, Len Gutkin FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [The Future of Advising - Buy Now]( [The Future of Advising]( Good advising is widely seen as central to student success, but it is one of the most misunderstood and under-supported divisions on campus. [Order your copy]( to learn how university leaders can improve advising systems to help close equity gaps, and ensure students effectively navigate their path to a degree. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2023 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037