NAFSA's departing leader reflects on her six years in office, from Trump to the pandemic. ADVERTISEMENT [Latitudes Logo]( Did someone forward you this newsletter? [Sign up free]( to receive your own copy. You can now read The Chronicle on [Flipboard]( and [Google News](. An exit interview with NAFSAâs Esther Brimmer Esther D. Brimmer couldnât have known the challenges she would face when she accepted the job as executive director and chief executive of NAFSA: Association of International Educators in October 2016. A few weeks later, Donald J. Trump was elected president. On the day of Brimmerâs first speech to a group of NAFSA volunteer leaders, he announced a [ban]( on travelers from a half-dozen predominantly Muslim countries, stranding students and scholars around the globe and making clear that his [America First]( policy positions werenât simply campaign rhetoric. Brimmer found herself leading a professional association whose members had to make the case for the work that they do. But her six years at NAFSAâs helm were not just about defending international education from policies that threatened to undercut it. She also had to steer the group through the Covid-19 pandemic, when global mobility was frozen. Brimmer will step down from NAFSA at the end of the year (a successor has yet to be named). A foreign-policy expert and academic who served as an assistant secretary of state, she will join the Council on Foreign Relations as a senior fellow in global governance. Brimmer sat down recently with Latitudes to talk about taking a more inclusive approach to international education, making tough choices, and higher educationâs role in solving global problems. The interview has been condensed and edited for clarity. Congratulations on your new role. Whatâs exciting is that itâs an opportunity to bring together people who are thinking about how you solve problems. To be able to convene people from different countries with very different views at this time is really important because the principles that underlie international society are under question again. I spent the first part of my career working on the question âHow can you enhance cooperation internationally?â It doesnât have to all be a Hobbesian world of violence. What are the structures that build peace and human well-being? Some of those are formal institutions. Others are habits of cooperation. International education is one of the best examples. Being able to work on these issues of how you bring together people as students and scholars, itâs part of building the positive side of international relations. But at this stage, unfortunately, we do have to go back and defend some of the principles. What was that like at NAFSA? And what did you learn from the experience? In October 2016, I accepted the job, but I was teaching, I needed to finish the semester. I remember asking, Is this a change-management job? The answer was, No, the field is flourishing, just build on that. And of course the world changed in November 2016. We already had a hint; we already had the Brexit vote that summer. Elements of disorder were already beginning to appear. The job shifted underneath you. As a result, were there things on your to-do list you were never able to get to? Thereâs dealing with an unfriendly administration, and then thereâs the pandemic, and those are two different types of challenges. Dealing with an administration that is not predisposed to support your approach is not something new. Although I would argue that some of the views that the administration took were extreme, you have to make your political case. I was happy to see that international education actually has bipartisan support. I think this is where NAFSAâs work makes an especially important contribution to the public-policy space, being able to help members of Congress understand the economic contribution of international students and their families in their districts. Now, of course, thereâs first a cultural and academic and scholarly and intellectual and community contribution. But if all else, you say, But you know there are this many jobs in your district because of international students? The pandemic was a whole other level. We had to really rethink some of the things we were going to do and reprioritize. We now have a new administration. Are there things youâve been able to gain traction on? One of the first things was the understanding that international education is a fundamental part of the way the United States engages internationally. There has been strong support for international education, things like the [statement]( that was first jointly issued by the secretary of state and secretary of education in July of last year. That was remarkable, the most forthright statement regarding international education in two decades. And we were thrilled to see that. Thereâs a sense that youâre working in partnership, that the people leading diplomacy truly understand the importance of international education. There were very practical elements as well. For example, there was a real need to get visas for students coming from India, and the embassy in Delhi and the consulates worked incredibly hard to prioritize international students. The administration said they would do that, and they did. Going forward, what are some of the most important trends for the field of international education? There are important changes that were happening even before the pandemic. But I think that we can be well positioned to address them. For the past 20 years, we have had a world historical phenomenon, which is the return of China to great-power status after 500 years. Part of that, of course, was Chinese students wanting to be educated across the West. That was going to [modulate]( anyway â we can all look at the population numbers. We also have to think about studentsâ economic constraints, and will there be an economic recession. We have to recognize sitting in the U.S. that there will be greater competition for international students. The number of international students is going to continue to grow, but thereâll be more places they can go. One of the things the United States absolutely needs is a coherent, integrated, national strategy for international education that brings together different branches of government. Ideally, it would be led by the White House. Many of our competitors have thought very seriously about how they bring their whole-of-government resources. And we can do the same. But I think there are also some great opportunities because it is more widely recognized now that the big issues have to be solved globally. The top issues like climate change â we all recognize that cannot be addressed by one country by itself. There are a lot of things we learned in the pandemic, but one is that we need to reconsider and recalibrate and reform the global public-health system. Both of those need global cooperation, and international education is part of that, cooperation on research is part of that. It can be natural to focus on the challenges. What makes you hopeful for international educationâs future? The recognition that international education is for everyone is profound. That should not just be a fad of this year. It should be our fundamental approach about how we think about inclusion and education. International education should be part of the discussion of higher education, not just in an aisle by ourselves. Weâre part of this larger question of whatâs the role of higher education, and we contribute to that. And so itâs important that NAFSA also work with colleagues who are in the general higher-education space to say that weâre all thinking about what does a good education mean. Why was this the right time for you to leave NAFSA? We had gotten through the worst of the pandemic, and we were able to return to an in-person conference. Weâre in good financial shape. Itâs not easy to downsize. Itâs very hard. But I thought it was crucial. You know the motto âKeep calm and carry on?â That was part of my job â not to get flustered, not to make rash decisions, not to be pushed into rash decisions. Working on the strategic plan, the membership structure, the transition to digital â all of these were things that were part of helping NAFSA to modernize for the future. ADVERTISEMENT Changes bring student-visa rules up to date The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has issued [new regulations]( to clarify policies and eliminate out-of-date language on student visas. For one, the rules formalize a Covid-era practice allowing college officials to use electronic signatures on student-visa documents rather than requiring them to physically sign all paperwork. The Biden administration announced last year that it was sticking with the pandemic flexibility, which higher-education groups had supported because of its efficiency and ease. The change is now permanent. Other updates eliminate references to the departmentâs precursor agency and requirements made obsolete by the transition from paper-based files to the online system of student-visa records. In some cases, the regulatory fixes reflect procedural changes made in practice years ago. The regulation is an interim final rule, meaning that it went into effect with its publication on Monday in the Federal Register. However, the department will still take public comments and could make further changes based on that feedback. SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to essential news, analysis, and advice. Who is speaking out on Iranian protests Some 100 colleges, academic departments, and student and faculty groups have released statements of support for protesters in Iran. You can find out who has spoken out in favor of human-rights and pro-democracy demonstrators in [this Twitter thread]( maintained by an adjunct professor at Georgetown Universityâs School of Foreign Service. I [wrote]( about a group of academics who encouraged college leaders to issue statements of solidarity. Nearly 600 college students have been detained by police and security forces in Iran since anti-government protests began in September, a human-rights group [reports](. SPONSOR CONTENT | Watermark [Student Retention: More Profitable Than Enrollment?]( Around the globe A professor at the University of California at San Diego said he had been [forced to resign]( following an investigation into possible conflicts in his ties to Chinese scientists. Xiang-Dong Fu, an American citizen who has taught at the university for three decades, said he had never acted inappropriately or illegally. The credit-rating agency Fitch cites rebounding international enrollments as a [positive sign]( amid headwinds for American colleges but warns that the strength of the dollar could make an American education too expensive for some foreign students. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has approved emergency employment authorization for international students from [Ethiopia]( who are suffering economic hardship caused by the armed conflict and civilian displacement in their home country. The Johns Hopkins University received a $100-million gift to expand the [Italy campus]( of its School of Advanced International Studies. A veteran political strategist has been elected as the new chair of the [Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board](. The family of a student from St. John Fisher University, in New York, said he [disappeared]( last month while studying abroad in France. International students contributed â¬5 billion to the French economy, according to a [study]( by Campus France. Seven student protesters in Myanmar have been [sentenced to death]( for allegedly killing a former military officer. The U.S. Comparative and International Education Society has issued a [statement]( expressing deep concern about the Sri Lanka governmentâs âstiflingâ of student movements. A Chinese man claims he has helped more 100 students [cheat]( on English-proficiency exams since online versions of the tests, typically required in international admissions, began to be offered during the pandemic. A new survey is seeking to document the needs of and resources available to undocumented graduate students. [Participate here](. ADVERTISEMENT And finally ⦠Readers, this is it â the last newsletter of 2022. Before I sign off, I want to say thank you for clicking to open my Wednesday emails and especially to all of you who have taken time over the past year to write in. I appreciate it all â the praise, the pans, the research, the reading recommendations, and so, so many insights. Your suggestions and perspectives help me see issues with fresh eyes, fuel my never-ending list of story ideas, and pick me up on the days when I feel as if Iâm typing into the void. You make Latitudes immeasurably better. I wish you peace and rest this holiday season, and I look forward to writing to you again in the new year. While Latitudes wonât publish, I welcome your feedback and tips over the break. Email me, at karin.fischer@chronicle.com. You can also connect with me on [Twitter]( or [LinkedIn](. If you like this newsletter, please share it with colleagues and friends. They can [sign up here](. Thanks for reading. SPONSOR CONTENT | New York University [Educating the next generation of urban scientists]( Since its inception, the Center for Urban Science + Progress has grown to become a thriving research hub that uses New York City and other urban areas as living labs to develop novel data- and technology-driven ways to improve city services. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2022 [The Chronicle of Higher Education](
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037