Newsletter Subject

Weekly Briefing: Florida Is Changing Accreditation, Post-Tenure Review, and More

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Sat, Mar 12, 2022 01:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

New legislation deals with the minutiae of the state's public colleges. Why? ADVERTISEMENT Did someo

New legislation deals with the minutiae of the state's public colleges. Why? ADVERTISEMENT [Weekly Briefing Logo]( Did someone forward you this newsletter? [Sign up free]( to receive your own copy. Florida lawmakers get into higher ed’s nitty-gritty. Every few months the Sunshine State makes higher-ed news of national importance. This week, Florida’s Republican-controlled Legislature [passed a bill]( that would require public colleges to seek new accreditors and would allow the Board of Governors to call for a post-tenure review every five years. Another bill would allow public colleges to [conceal the names]( of presidential candidates until the finalists are chosen. Both bills are expected to be signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican. The requirement to force colleges to seek out new accreditors may be the first of its kind, said our senior reporter Eric Kelderman, who covers accreditation. Post-tenure reviews, meanwhile, are quite common. Many institutions, including ones in Florida, require tenured faculty members to undergo a comprehensive evaluation every five years or so. But Florida faculty members and some lawmakers expressed concerns about the tenure-review bill, arguing it’s unnecessary and seems politically motivated. The Board of Governors, which supervises the state’s 12 public universities and which will write the post-tenure review regulation, “is appointed by the governor,” one Democratic representative said, [according to the]( Bay Times](. “It’s inherently political.” The legislative actions in Florida are seen, in part, as a response to the academic-freedom saga at the University of Florida last fall, when professors [were]( allowed to serve as expert witnesses]( in a voting-rights lawsuit against the state. Though the decision was [reversed]( after a public [outcry]( they were at first told that faculty testimony would be “adverse to UF’s interests.” The bills, which regulate the finer details of higher education, are not attention-grabbing measures like [restricting how racism]( is taught or [penalizing student protesters](. Supporters of the changes say they are meant to improve student outcomes, hold faculty members more accountable, and encourage qualified candidates to apply for leadership positions. However, national higher-education experts and some Florida professors say the bills are an attack on the principles that protect faculty members and their institutions. Last fall the accreditor of Florida’s public colleges sent a letter to the University of Florida asking about reports that it had prevented several faculty members from serving as expert witnesses in the voting-rights case. The situation was a possible violation of the accreditor’s standards for academic freedom. Belle Wheelan, president of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges, also sent a letter to Florida State University about its presidential search, expressing concerns that Richard Corcoran, the state’s education commissioner and an ex-officio member of the Board of Governors, had been nominated. The letter said there could be a [conflict of interest]( if Corcoran was considered for the position while remaining on the state board. Other accreditors have similar standards that would have led to similar inquiries, but new rules, approved under the former U.S. education secretary Betsy DeVos, make it easier for some institutions to find new accreditors. But on Thursday the U.S. Department of Education [sent a letter to]( and to]( Florida]( of Education]( warning that forcing public colleges to seek new accreditors could jeopardize their access to federal funds in the form of student loans, Pell Grants, and other financial aid. The Education Department raised three issues in its warning letter. Notably, the letter says, any college applying for a new accreditor must get approval from the secretary of education and demonstrate a “reasonable cause” for the change. That approval process aims to “prevent institutions from changing accreditors in search of lower standards, which may be implicated here,” reads the letter. In an email to Eric, a top department official said that his staff was still evaluating the situation. Read the full stories: - [Education Dept. Warns Florida: Forcing Colleges to Change Accreditors Jeopardizes Federal Aid]( - [Florida Lawmakers Put a Conservative Stamp on Higher Ed]( - [Florida’s Public Colleges May Soon Recruit Presidents in Secret]( SPONSOR CONTENT | The Registry [Providing Experienced Leadership for Change]( ADVERTISEMENT Lagniappe. - Learn. Where do you feel the pinch of inflation? At the gas pump? Grocery store? Dining out? Here’s [where 2,200 Americans notice a change](. (The New York Times) - Read. Why are new movies [so long]( (Variety) - Listen. If you like chocolate and languages, [this podcast]( — about Kinder Surprise Eggs, a British treat — is for you. The surprise is always a small toy, but the accompanying warning paper is a delight itself. The advisory is in 34 languages. Here’s a close look at the tiny warning. (The Allusionist) - Laugh. Has anyone ever won a New Yorker caption contest? If you (like me) have not, don’t worry. [Turns out an AI program couldn’t even do it](. (The Pudding) —Fernanda SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHRONICLE Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for unlimited access to essential news, analysis, and advice. Chronicle Top Reads A CIRCLE OF SUPPORT [The Redemption of Frederick Shegog]( By Eric Hoover [STORY IMAGE]( What a six-time dropout learned about getting through college. SPONSOR CONTENT | The Registry [Providing Experienced Leadership for Change]( Providing a comprehensive approach to securing interim leadership within higher education, learn how The Registry is offering a service that is solely focused on the needs of the institution. PUBLISHING [The Essay That Prompted an Editorial Revolt]( By Tom Bartlett [STORY IMAGE]( Eight student editors resigned from a law journal at Duke rather than be associated with an essay by Kathleen Stock on sex and language. ADMISSIONS [Berkeley Predicted It Would Have to Slash Enrollment by Thousands. Not So Fast.]( By Katherine Mangan [STORY IMAGE]( The university had predicted that a court order would prompt it to slash the enrollment of its new class. But then it ran the numbers again. ADVERTISEMENT FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [Building Students' Resilience]( [Building Students' Resilience]( Colleges are under pressure to meet the mental-health needs of students. Leaders also need to understand when to intervene. [Order your copy]( to explore strategies to address student mental health, and get guidance for how your staff and faculty can best support resilience and well-being. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK What did you think of today’s newsletter? [Strongly disliked]( | [It was ok]( | [Loved it]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2022 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.