Newsletter Subject

The Review: Peer Review or Mafia? Jesus' Wife; Pornography; Retraction!

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Tue, Jul 6, 2021 11:03 AM

Email Preheader Text

Why hasn't the Harvard Theological Review withdrawn a debunked article? ADVERTISEMENT You

Why hasn't the Harvard Theological Review withdrawn a debunked article? ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( [logo] Was this newsletter forwarded to you? [Please sign up to receive your own copy.]( You’ll support our journalism and ensure that you continue to receive our emails. [Read this newsletter on the web](. Back in 2016, the journalist Ariel Sabar published an [essay]( in The Atlantic, “The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus’s Wife,” debunking a 2014 Harvard Theological Review article by the Harvard Divinity School professor Karen L. King that purported to have discovered an ancient papyrus fragment in which Jesus refers to “my wife.” As Sabar shows, the fragment was a forgery — the work of an eccentric German pornographer. (Sabar, setting out to uncover the provenance of an ancient text about Jesus’s wife, finds instead one Walter Fritz, who “had launched a series of pornographic sites that showcased his wife having sex with other men.”) King acknowledged that she’d been duped. But the Harvard Theological Review has not, to this day, retracted the now thoroughly discredited paper. In his follow-up [article for]( Chronicle Review]( Sabar asks](. I don’t want to give too much away, but the answer seems to involve a species of peer-review malpractice that I personally found quite shocking. It’s like discovering that a famous restaurant has centipedes in the kitchen. Paid for and Created by University of Denver [University of Denver Research Addresses Global Challenges]( Learn how University of Denver faculty and students are collaborating with other institutions, community organizations and state agencies to drive positive innovation, leveraging its diverse portfolio of knowledge leaders to create global solutions. The fact of the matter is that King’s article should never have had a chance of publication, because the appearance of an actually interesting papyrus fragment in pristine isolation from any other material screams “fraud” about as unambiguously as anything can. Noah Feldman, just a few days after the Theological Review article published, [explained why in]( One of the most important questions in determining the authenticity of an ancient artifact that possesses potentially enormous religious or theological significance is why that artifact in particular survived. In antiquity, there were millions of papyri, and the odds that one particular fragment to have survived would be so important are stunningly small. If the fragment came from some large cache of similarly aged yet utterly boring and unimportant documents, that would be some reason to consider it possibly authentic. If it didn’t, that would be prima facie evidence that it was forged. “Almost everything we know,” Feldman wrote, “about the nature of historical evidence points to forgery.” That “everything we know” was so insistently ignored by credentialed experts speaks to a depth of need that is almost touching. The scholars’ resonant wish for meaningful fragments of the Biblical past overrode training, past experience, and common sense; in place of these safeguards was the romance of contact with antiquity and the desire for professional glory. “It is the glory of God to conceal things, but the glory of kings is to search things out.” ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( Subscribe to The Chronicle The Chronicle’s award-winning journalism challenges conventional wisdom, holds academic leaders accountable, and empowers you to do your job better — and it’s your support that makes our work possible. [Subscribe Today]( The Latest THE REVIEW [A Scholarly Screw-Up of Biblical Proportions]( By Ariel Sabar [image] Harvard Theological Review offers an exemplary guide on how not to do peer review. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( THE REVIEW [‘The Culture-War Stuff Just Rots the Brain’]( By Len Gutkin [image] The sociologist Musa al-Gharbi on empire, Islam, and the hypocritical liberalism of Manhattan. THE REVIEW [The UNC Scandal No One Talks About]( By Andy Thomason [image] The Nikole Hannah-Jones case has Black scholars asking if they’re welcome. It’s not the first time. ADVICE [Young, Black, Female, and Moving Into Campus Leadership]( By Rachel N. Bonaparte-Hagos [image] Lessons learned during the transition from faculty member to administrator. Recommended: - “I do not doubt for a moment that the student movement in its current form is heading towards that technocratization of the university that it claims it wants to prevent.” That’s Adorno, writing to Horkheimer, quoted in Alexander Stern’s [Hedgehog Review]( on Adorno’s anxieties about the threat of what he called “left-wing fascism” in the 1960s. - “She develops a taxonomy of ‘cultish’ linguistic tendencies from ‘the crafty redefinition of existing words’ (i.e., calling a gym a ‘box’ for no real reason), thought-terminating clichés (labeling good-faith doubts and concerns as ‘limiting beliefs’), and monikers that establish an us-versus-them binary (the ‘truth seekers’ versus ‘sheeple’ of QAnon).” At The New Republic, [Jennifer Wilson reviews]( Amanda Montell’s new book on the language games that cults play. - “The world’s coming to an end, so you got a certain darkness.” At Screen Slate, the legendary filmmaker Abel Ferrara [is in conversation]( A.S. Hamrah. I’m always hoping to hear from you — write to opinion@chronicle.com. Yours, Len Gutkin Paid for and Created by Dipont Education [The Making of a Global Educator]( Since joining Dipont Education and shaping the curriculum at Kunshan American School in China, Carol Santos says her view of what global education entails continues to evolve as she learns more about her students and their needs. Today's Global Campus Strategies for Reviving International Enrollments and Study Abroad Pandemic travel restrictions cut both ways, causing international enrollments to plummet and limiting study-abroad opportunities. This Chronicle report provides an in-depth look at how the global education experience has changed and offers strategies for assessing and adapting programs to ensure students' exposure to cultural and global diversity. [Order your copy today.]( Job Opportunities [Search the Chronicle's jobs database]( to view the latest jobs in higher education. What did you think of today’s newsletter? [Strongly disliked]( // [It was OK]( // [Loved it](. [logo]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2021 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.