Dumping the DeVos legacy is expected, but what about alt-credentials, income-share agreements, and other trends amid the continuing pandemic? ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( [logo] [Read this newsletter on the web](. Iâm Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around academe. Hereâs what Iâm thinking about this week. How the new Education Department could shape some hot-button questions. Happy 2021. One thing last year taught us was the risk of making new yearâs predictions. Still, with [Miguel Cardona nominated for]( of]( itâs worth thinking about how President Joe Bidenâs department will differ from its predecessor. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( Subscribe to The Chronicle The Chronicleâs award-winning journalism challenges conventional wisdom, holds academic leaders accountable, and empowers you to do your job better â and itâs your support that makes our work possible. [Subscribe Today]( On some policies thatâs easy: Expect Cardona to reverse what Betsy DeVos did. We will probably see a return to broader approaches to Title IX enforcement, stricter regulation of for-profit higher education, and a less-cumbersome regimen for students seeking loan-repayment relief if theyâve been defrauded by their colleges. The crystal ball gets a bit cloudier for policies on issues the DeVos department didnât pay much attention to â especially some of the trendy ideas that are often lumped under âhigher-ed innovation,â and that frequently stir controversy because thereâs big money involved or they threaten established norms. Iâm thinking here about developments like the growing influence of online-program-management companies, the push for income-share agreements as a college-financing option, and the rise of alternative credentials, among others. Yet some emerging political and economic factors could determine the departmentâs posture toward any âinnovation agenda.â Early signs point to an administration focused more on keeping things stable than on pushing the envelope. To help me assess the landscape, I consulted three higher-ed observers with varying political perspectives: David Soo, chief of staff at Jobs for the Future and a former senior policy official for innovation in the Obama Education Department; Lanae Erickson, senior vice president for social policy and politics at Third Way, a self-styled centrist think tank in Washington; and Andrew Kelly, now senior vice president for strategy and policy at the University of North Carolina system office, and before that, the founding director of the Center on Higher Education Reform at the American Enterprise Institute. Also, two caveats: Without knowing who will head up higher-ed policy for the department, any predictions today could be off. And it may well be that responding to the pandemic will continue to be the all-consuming theme for many months to come. 3 key issues and where the department might come down. I wonder especially about online-program-management companies (OPMs) and income-share agreements (ISAs) because in the months before Covid-19 hit, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, singled out both for scrutiny, and the departmentâs independent Office of Inspector General identified OPMs as a target of study. OPMs have become [a $3-billion-plus industry]( globally over the past decade, thanks in part to a department action in 2011, which to my mind is a pretty thin reed of support for a sector of this size. The action â not even a full-fledged regulation â exempted collegesâ use of the companies from a federal ban on paying recruiters based on enrollment, as long as the colleges involved were controlling enrollment and the two entities remained independent of each other. But if there was once fervor for a clampdown on OPMs, on [the argument that they claim too much of a share of the tuition pie and indirectly drive up tuition costs]( the pandemic pivot to online education may have changed that calculus. Colleges are more dependent on these companies than ever before, and, as Soo noted, âa lot of higher-ed institutions like them and are making a lot of money off them.â Maybe, though, the online pivot will also fan the flames. Lots of student-advocacy groups see OPMs as a ânet negative,â Erickson said, and she predicted those groups, along with civil-rights organizations and teachersâ unions, would hold a lot of sway with the departmentâs new leadership and its approach to regulation. For the same reasons, Erickson said she expects ISAs wonât get much traction from the incoming Education Department. Some colleges and other providers, such as coding boot camps, would love to see more legal clarity around ISAs to make them easier to adopt. But with all the discussion about canceling student debt, Erickson said, âthe loan conversation has moved to the left in a serious way.â Financing models regarded as [Wall Streetâs answer to the student-debt crisis]( arenât likely to win much favor. The alternative-credentials movement, on the other hand, could be in line for a boost. Thatâs especially likely, said Kelly, âgiven where the economy is and may be for a while.â Getting people quickly back into jobs is going to be a big priority for policy makers, and that may prompt the department to make it easier to use Pell Grants and other federal funds in [nondegree programs](. Certificates and other offerings at community colleges, Erickson added, could get particular attention and leeway in the next administration. Other proposals from them could too. On alt-credentials and other topics, all three of my âconsultantsâ said they hoped the new Education Department would reflect on past experience in setting policies. A [just-released analysis]( of a department experiment using Pell Grants for short-term programs, for example, found that while the funds did make it easier for students to enroll and complete the programs, there was no proof that people ended up in better-paying jobs as a result. (Hat tip to New Americaâs Clare McCann for [this Twitter thread that nicely summarizes those findings]( Thatâs a good reminder of another factor that could differentiate Bidenâs Education Department from Obamaâs. Itâs a lot easier to collect and analyze data on studentsâ incomes and labor-market outcomes today than it was in 2008. On many counts, policy makers should be sure to make use of that information in setting a course. Student needs, college closures, and the bully pulpit. Beyond the topics that interested me, Erickson, Kelly, and Soo each had further thoughts about how the department would â or should â prioritize innovation. Money and policies matter, said Soo, but plain old advocacy can make a big difference, too: âThereâs so much that can be done with the bully pulpit that hasnât been used in the past four years.â Where conversations about innovation used to focus primarily on affordability, the pandemic has highlighted the importance of recognizing a broader range of student needs. âNow,â Erickson said, âitâs about studentsâ homelessness and child care and broadband.â If the Biden administration plans to make good on [its many postsecondary]( proposals]( â including free community college for all and debt-free college for many others â that could consume the department for the next couple of years, said Kelly. That wonât leave much energy for other matters. But given the effects of the pandemic and continuing demographic trends, many more âprecipitous closuresâ of colleges are clearly on the horizon. âIt always seems to be incredibly disruptive,â he said. âDo the feds need to rethink how any of that works?â Got a tip youâd like to share or a question youâd like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, [find them here](. To receive your own copy, free, register [here](. If you want to follow me on Twitter, [@GoldieStandard]( is my handle. Goldieâs Weekly Picks PHILANTHROPY [For These Colleges, MacKenzie Scottâs Hundreds of Millions in Gifts Mean âthe Space to Dreamâ]( By Lindsay Ellis [image] Unexpected emails and phone calls brought word of seven- and eight-figure donations to community colleges, tribal institutions, and minority-serving campuses â a rarity in higher education. PANDEMIC AID [Congress Will Give Colleges $20 Billion in Relief and â Surprise! â Some Long-Awaited Policy Reforms]( By Eric Kelderman [image] While leaders said the Covid-19 stimulus bill offered far less than what higher ed needs, they cheered policy reforms like the second-chance Pell and a simplified application for student aid. HOPE FOR THE INCARCERATED [Their Stories Helped Lift a 26-Year Ban on Pell Grants for Prisoners]( By Katherine Mangan [image] A college education transformed former inmatesâ lives. But some critics fear low-quality programs will rush in. Paid for and Created by TIAA [Your Financial Wellbeing in Challenging Times]( The uncertainty of being furloughed or laid off during Covid-19 for many in the higher ed industry today makes it challenging to manage life, both emotionally and financially. To help plan for a secure financial future, TIAA has assembled a library of resources for guidance on retirement savings, spending habits and adapting in difficult times. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( Job Announcement Faculty Openings - Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis [Visit jobs.chronicle.com]( for more details. Paid for and Created by JLL [15 ways to lower costs and generate new revenues through your campus facilities]( From uncovering underutilized land and buildings to identifying inefficiencies, an analysis of your facilities data can uncover hidden costs and support campus management during these unprecedented times. The Chronicle's Featured Report: The Post-Pandemic College [Leading experts examine how the pandemic will shape higher education]( in the years to come and what the college of the future may look like. To recover well, colleges must develop a more externally-focused business model, direct resources to expand professional development in online teaching, and continue to expand mental-health services. Job Opportunities [Search the Chronicle's jobs database]( to view the latest jobs in higher education. What did you think of todayâs newsletter? [Strongly disliked]( // [It was OK]( // [Loved it](. [logo]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2021 [The Chronicle of Higher Education](
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037