Newsletter Subject

The Edge: Remember When We Thought Higher Ed Was 'In Crisis'?

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Wed, Sep 30, 2020 11:02 AM

Email Preheader Text

The fissures that have deepened since then — and the trends that bode well — can help us u

The fissures that have deepened since then — and the trends that bode well — can help us understand today’s crisis and how to dig out. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( [Advertisement]( [Advertisement]( [logo] Was this newsletter forwarded to you? [Please sign up to receive your own copy.]( You’ll support our journalism and ensure that you continue to receive our emails. [Read this newsletter on the web](. I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around academe. As the Covid-19 crisis continues, here’s what I’m thinking about this week. I wrote the book on the higher-ed crisis. Then came 2020. Six autumns ago, Oxford University Press published my “primer” on the myriad challenges facing colleges and students, [American Higher Education in Crisis? What Everyone Needs to Know](. I always understood that it wasn’t really what everyone needed to know. That just happened to be the [OUP series]( under which my Q&A-style book was published. What I didn’t imagine was just how much worse the higher-education crisis could get once it collided with a mismanaged pandemic and a nationwide reckoning on race. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( [Advertisement]( [Advertisement]( Subscribe to The Chronicle Our mission, at a time of crisis and uncertainty, is to ensure you have the information you need to make the best decisions for your institution, your career, and your students. Please consider subscribing today to sustain our continuing coverage. [Subscribe Today]( Still, looking back at the book, I realize that several issues I highlighted have become even more relevant over the past seven months — particularly the racial and economic disparities in educational opportunity and the potential and limits of online education. Meanwhile, some of the crucial issues bubbling up today — the ["trust gap"]( between college leaders and faculty and staff members, for one — didn’t seem as "live-or-death" important in 2014. I wasn’t as farsighted as another author, Bryan Alexander, who actually speculated on the potential effects of a pandemic in his early-2020 book, [Academia Next](. And I feel no sense of satisfaction in seeing fissures I called out six years ago deepening today. Frankly, it’s painful. But I do think re-examining where I thought the sector was headed — and what its biggest challenges were — could help us comprehend the current crisis and, eventually, dig out of it. Three troubling trends have intensified under the pandemic. Covid-19 and its economic spillovers have hit hardest low-income students, as well as those who are Black, Hispanic, and Native American. While it’s still too early to have a firm sense of fall enrollments, early stats from the National Student Clearinghouse show that [community colleges have seen the steepest declines]( 8 percent over all. Those are the institutions where the highest shares of these students tend to enroll, and where public support is lowest. Of course the stratification in American higher education isn’t new. When OUP asked me to write the book, my chief reason for signing on was the chance to explore the idea that higher ed could be an “engine of inequality.” Since 2014, projects like the University Innovation Alliance and the American Talent Initiative have come along to create new pathways to four-year colleges for historically marginalized students — with mixed success. The pandemic will further test such efforts. Meanwhile, the pivot to online education has highlighted the many ways that students who attend the same institution come from divergent circumstances. In the book I paid heed to the very real, and still very prevalent “bandwidth divide” that leaves many students without broadband capacity. But I missed some of the other factors the online shift has revealed: While away from their campuses, many students lack quiet spaces to study or even attend classes online. This obstacle always existed, but it became impossible to ignore once campuses closed and professors could see into Zoom windows. By this fall, most colleges seem to have responded to tech challenges by sending students laptops and Wi-Fi hot spots. The bigger issues go beyond that. And then there’s the reality that the fragile business model underlying many colleges may not withstand the pressures of the pandemic. Long before Covid-19, some colleges (mostly private) relied heavily on tuition discounts and other financial sleight-of-hand maneuvers to bring in a class. In my book I highlighted both the economic risks of such tactics and the ethical ones, too, in cases where colleges deprive lower-income students of financial aid but award merit scholarships to lure in families that can pay a greater portion of the tuition bill. The more students become disenchanted with online courses or socially distant instruction and campus life, the less likely that enough tuition revenue will come in. Add to that the risks many colleges face in losing international students (because of visa and travel restrictions) and state support (inevitable cuts because of the economic downturn made worse by Congress’s delays in passing another relief package) — and you can see the writing on the wall. It’s not a happy message. But here are two trends that bode well. I worked on my book from mid-2013 to late 2014, the era just after MOOC hype had subsided and conversations about other educational providers and alternative credentials were taking off. Honestly, though, for years afterward, it seemed most of that would never move beyond talk. But since the pandemic — and the staggering rise in unemployment that’s accompanied it — I’ve seen a change. Though hardly a tidal wave, there’s been a notable uptick in colleges’ interest in working with outside educational partners, in students’ enrollment in less-traditional institutions, and in employers’ attention to skills-based hiring and unconventional credentials. Some examples are the thousands of professors who have been dipping into the Coursera library of courses as part of its Coursera for Campus program, the record-high enrollments at the nonprofit University of the People, and the spate of new relationships that companies like StraighterLine and Minerva have forged with colleges over the past few months. As for employers, I’m referring especially to a new Chronicle survey of hiring managers that we’ll be sharing today as part of our “What Employers Want” event (Read on for more details on that). The most obvious pandemic-prompted change is colleges’ growing reliance on online education. That, too, of course, isn’t new. But six years ago, thousands of colleges didn’t offer any online courses. Today I doubt that is true of more than a handful. As I wrote in my first Covid-era newsletter — about [higher ed’s “black swan” moment]( the virus has become the most significant catalyst for online education in the short history of the movement. In the book, I wrote: “The number of college leaders who say distance education is critical to their institution’s long-term strategy has been growing, but many of their faculty members continue to doubt its effectiveness compared to face-to-face teaching.” I’m sure that’s still true today. But having heard from so many colleges recently about how, out of necessity, they’ve invested in online resources and beefed up faculty training — and from professors themselves about what they’ve come to value about online teaching — I have no doubt that this period marks a turning point. I’m not saying that it’s a complete sea change. Indeed, that’s a point I plan to dig in on Thursday with a panel of online educators and company executives in a session called “Covid Changes the Game: Higher Education Forced Online,” which is part of the [ASU+GSV Summit](. What’s permanent about this shift, and what’s not? My sense from college leaders is that even after we get a vaccine, many institutions will continue to offer virtual options. But I also still believe, as I wrote on the last page of the book, that campuses will long continue to play a vital role in the college experience — as intellectual centers, as places of refuge and opportunity for students, as hubs for activities vital to student development, as centers of political activism, and as the “third places” Ray Oldenburg has described as so needed by society for communal engagement. The pandemic has taken that from us, but (insert your own “wear a mask” message here) hopefully not for long. Please join me for a virtual event today on “What Employers Want.” Come for the release of a Chronicle survey of employers, followed by a conversation between Jeff Selingo and two college leaders: Joe May, chancellor of the Dallas County Community College District, and Lynn Wooten, president of Simmons University, on strengthening the transition from college to career. And stay for my discussion with Mary Marcy, president of Dominican University of California, and Louis Soares, chief learning and innovation officer at the American Council on Education, on smart ways for colleges to realign their curricula to better meet the demands of a changing job market. Sign up [here]( to watch it live at 2 p.m. Eastern time today or later on demand. And once again, here’s a reminder about voter registration. There’s still time (in some states, plenty of time) to make sure you and your friends and colleagues — and your students! — are all squared away to vote on or before Election Day, on November 3. After all, the federal Higher Education Act requires colleges to make a good-faith effort to encourage students to register. See [here]( for details on registering and voting. Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, [find them here](. To receive your own copy, free, register [here](. If you want to follow me on Twitter, [@GoldieStandard]( is my handle. Goldie’s Weekly Picks POLITICS [The New Order]( By Lindsay Ellis, Jack Stripling, and Dan Bauman [image] How the nation’s partisan divisions consumed public-college boards and warped higher education. INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION [Trump Bars Federal Grants for ‘Divisive and Harmful’ Racial-Sensitivity Training]( By Katherine Mangan [image] Diversity leaders say the executive order could have a chilling effect on efforts to improve campus racial climates. ENROLLMENT [Even Amid Covid-19, Enrollment Soared at This University. Here’s Why.]( By Vimal Patel [image] It helps to be a public regional. But at a time of profound disconnection, cultivating relationships is key. Paid for and Created by Cisco [The Next Normal]( Digital transformation is accelerating as a result of the global pandemic, and distance learning providers are doing their best to keep up with their partners’ needs and challenges. ADVERTISEMENT [Advertisement]( [Advertisement]( [Advertisement]( Job Announcement Part-time Faculty, Drafting position available at Palomar College.[Visit jobs.chronicle.com]( for more details. Paid for and Created by Microsoft [Reaching All College Students]( Worldwide, one in five people deal with some kind of learning disability. With new technology, higher ed has an opportunity to make learning accessible to an even greater population. Leading During the Pandemic is less than a month away. Hurry, spots are filling up! Curriculum and Faculty | October 23 Students and Learning | November 6 The Chronicle has partnered with DeverJustice LLC and Ithaka S+R for a virtual professional development series to help academic leaders navigate the increasingly complex challenges they’re facing. Each workshop includes a two-hour symposium, open to all academic leaders, and a breakout session for department chairs. Space is extremely limited: [register today.]( Job Opportunities [Search the Chronicle's jobs database]( to view the latest jobs in higher education. What did you think of today’s newsletter? [Strongly disliked]( // [It was OK]( // [Loved it](. [logo]( This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2020 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

EDM Keywords (222)

wrote writing write working worked withstand well week web wear watch want wall vote visa virus view value us university unemployment uncertainty true trends transition today tip time thursday thousands thought thinking think test taking taken tactics sustain sure support subsided study students strengthening stratification still stay spate society since signing shift share sent sense seen seemed seem see sector saying satisfaction revealed result responded reminder relevant release registering refuge receive really realize reality realign real racial question published professors primer pressures potential point play plan places pivot permanent people pay past partnered part panel pandemic painful opportunity one offer number newsletter new needed need necessity nation movement months mission missed minerva many manage make lure lowest logo live limits like less later know kind keep journalism ithaka invested intensified institutions institution insert information imagine ignore idea hubs hopefully highlighted helps heard headed happened handful growing get friends forwarded forged follow fissures filling feel farsighted families fall faculty factors facing face explore examples examining even era ensure enroll engine employers email efforts education early doubt divisive discussion dipping dig details described demands demand delays curriculum curricula critical crisis created courses coursera course copy conversations conversation continue congress come collided colleges college colleagues class cisco chronicle chance centers cases career campuses called california bring book best beefed become away attend add accompanied accelerating 2014

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.