Newsletter Subject

The Edge: Why Isn't It a No-Brainer to Embed 'Certifications' Into Bachelor's Degrees?

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Wed, Dec 4, 2019 12:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Research suggests that certifications can help liberal-arts graduates improve their job prospects. S

Research suggests that certifications can help liberal-arts graduates improve their job prospects. Some people still aren't sold on them. [The Edge] Was this newsletter forwarded to you? [Please sign up to receive your own copy.]( You’ll support our journalism and ensure that you continue to receive our emails. --------------------------------------------------------------- I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education, covering innovation in and around academe. I’m back from some time off. Hope you all enjoyed your holidays, too. Here’s what I’m thinking about this week. Why isn’t it a no-brainer to embed ‘certifications’ into bachelor’s degrees? At community colleges, the idea of students earning industry and professional certifications as they pursue their education is often standard operating procedure. At four-year colleges, not so much. ADVERTISEMENT [advertisement]( This is true even though recent research suggests that [liberal-arts graduates can improve their job prospects]( if they graduate with even one or two industry-specific skills along with their degree. So when I heard about a new project to encourage more bachelor’s-level institutions to embed certifications into their curricula, of course I was interested. I became even more interested — and little perplexed — when I learned from the project organizers that the college folks from the liberal arts seemed the most resistant to the idea. The project involves two higher-ed groups (the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities and Upcea, which represents leaders in professional, continuing, and online education) and a five-year-old organization called Workcred, which promotes the use of quality credentials by educators and employers, and is backed by $320,000 from the Lumina Foundation. And it reflects Workcred’s vision for how the bachelor’s degree should be reimagined, with academics, work-based learning, and an industry-recognized credential all part of the package. “Those three components,” Roy Swift, the executive director of Workcred, told me, “will become the quality degree of the future.” I’m not 100-percent sold on that vision. But I can see the logic of it. And apparently, based on some of the initial meetings between certification groups and college representatives from the health-care and cybersecurity disciplines, so do many of the colleges. (Folks representing manufacturing will meet next week, and those in retail and hospitality will be gathering in March.) Let’s pause for a minute to clarify what a “certification” really involves, and how it differs from badges, licenses, and the certificates that many colleges increasingly offer at the conclusion of their shorter, non-degree programs. The big difference is that certifications are offered by associations or industry groups, based on a standardized exam that measures a person’s knowledge of relevant job skills. Also, as Swift noted, they’re valid for only a limited time period, can be revoked for incompetency or ethical lapses, and are not awarded by the same organizations that provided the education or training. Certifications, quite literally, are an independent measure of the industry standard. This handy [one-pager from Workcred]( spells it out nicely. Groups that offer certifications in financial planning, safety examination, and IT already work closely with several four-year colleges where the disciplines match up. And some institutions, like Ohio University, specifically aligned academic offerings — in this case its engineering-technology program — to prepare students for the exam to be a [Certified Manufacturing Specialist](. The new [“nexus degree” experiment in Georgia]( that my colleague Alexander Kafka recently wrote about is a permutation on this idea as well. But when Workcred put certification groups together with college folks representing the liberal arts, the reception wasn’t exactly warm. Isabel Cardenas-Navia, Workcred’s director of research, attended that session. For many four-year colleges, it seemed “a leap too far,” she told me. “They kept saying, ‘Our degree is enough.’’’ OK, let’s be generous, not judgy. Maybe some of their resistance was their feeling that their job was to prepare students with skills for the future, not the right now? Swift wasn’t buying it. “We find, actually, they’re behind.” Shalin Jyotishi, APLU’s assistant director for economic development and community engagement, had a more sympathetic take. “There are some disciplines where this innovation lends itself more easily,” he said, while acknowledging the, uh, “mixed reception” the idea got from the liberal-arts contingent. “Part of it is rhetoric,” he told me. “The liberal-arts faculty feeling squeezed or attacked or called out for not being relevant to employers.” Also, he noted, colleges are already facing pressures to add in more opportunities for things like internships, courses in entrepreneurship, and even coding. Add to that the push for education leading to certifications, and people get nervous about whether students can fit it all in and still graduate on time, which is still a big way colleges get measured by their lawmakers. I get that. As Jyotishi noted, faculty are also continually being told to publish more, get more grants, do more advising. So this movement might easily seem like just one more demand on their time and one more attack on their expertise. Except for this: Resisting this idea undermines the value that an embedded certification could bring to students — not just the ones who graduate but even more so the ones forced by financial or family circumstances to leave school permanently or temporarily before getting their degree. That’s often a reality for students today, and the embedded certification could help ensure they don’t leave college with nothing. The idea holds more potential. The Workcred meetings are just the first step. Eventually, Workcred leaders hope that some of the 67 participating institutions will create some new experiments involving embedded certifications, and that the ideas catch on. One idea that has intrigued Swift is the notion of a generalized curriculum for entry into nursing or medicine, an idea first proposed by Heather Mitchell, who directs the BSN program at the University of Louisville. The approach, she told me, could give students options for other health-science careers and “to have a job while they’re going to school.” That can matter a lot. Mitchell’s approach isn’t a formal proposal; it’s just her idea. Still, even before any experiments emerge, the project has been useful in other ways. For one, the meetings have surfaced the need for discussion about finances. Federal financial aid can’t be used for non-degree programs, or the costs for certification exams, which can easily run several hundred dollars a pop. The exam for a project management certification costs $555; one from the Society of Human Resource Management is about $350. For low-income students, these aren’t trivial amounts. Universities might want to consider fund-raising for these costs, Jyotishi said, or push for changes in government financial-aid programs. The meetings have also created some of the first opportunities for leaders of colleges and certification bodies to meet together. For many it was eye-opening. Jyotishi said “There were some certification folks who said, ‘What’s a provost?’” That doesn’t really surprise me, When I was researching my [“Career-Ready Education”]( report, I heard often about the importance of recognizing and bridging the culture gap between employers and colleges. So I guess the same is true for the certification bodies. It made Jyotishi realize, “We need a place to do this.” Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, or sign up to receive your own copy, you can do so [here](. If you want to follow me on Twitter, [@GoldieStandard]( is my handle. Subscribe Today The Chronicle’s award-winning journalism challenges conventional wisdom, holds academic leaders accountable, and empowers you to do your job better — and it’s your support that makes our work possible. [Subscribe Today]( Goldie’s Weekly Picks [Lessons From Vermont’s Demographic Crisis]( By Scott Carlson Don’t dismiss the state as a mere outlier: It’s at the leading edge of a decline in students that is looming over other parts of the country. (PREMIUM) [How a $250-Million Campus-Housing Deal Went Bad]( By Lee Gardner An ambitious residential project at the University of Oklahoma has become a cautionary tale about public-private partnerships. (PREMIUM) [Remedial Reforms Are Removing Barriers for Students. Here Are 4 Key Challenges to Scaling the Changes Up.]( By Katherine Mangan Overhauling developmental education will require faculty buy-in and wraparound supports, reformers say. (PREMIUM) Paid for and Created by Babson College [$50 Million Gift Boldly Expands Entrepreneurial Leadership at Babson College]( Elizabeth Atwater Babson College and the Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation partner to establish the Arthur M. Blank School for Entrepreneurial Leadership, fueling future generations of entrepreneurial leaders. Latest Jobs Visit [ChronicleVitae.com]( to view the latest jobs in higher education. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Sign up]( for other newsletters, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2019 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 [The Chronicle of Higher Education](

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.