Newsletter Subject

Re:Learning | With Employers in the Mix, Can Badges Become More Than a Fad?

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

wiredcampus@chronicle.com

Sent On

Tue, Aug 21, 2018 11:12 AM

Email Preheader Text

--------------------------------------------------------------- Re:Learning Tuesday, August 21, 2018

[THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION] #subscribelink [Subscribe Today]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Subscribe to The Chronicle today to get access to premium content and more.]( Re:Learning Tuesday, August 21, 2018 --------------------------------------------------------------- [Sign up for this newsletter]( I'm Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education covering innovation in and around academe. Here's what's on my mind this week: With employers in the mix, can badges become more than a fad? For years colleges have been mulling how to design badges that highlight the skills that make students more hireable. But these efforts have typically been missing a key ingredient: buy-in from employers. [A new project by the Education Design Lab]( start to change that. It will involve employers who have committed to consider badges in their hiring of recent college graduates. The project is small -- up to six colleges paired with a local employer with no more than 300 students altogether -- but nonetheless worth watching. That's because until now, even among the "disrupt college" crowd, [the buzz over badges]( tended to overwhelm the reality. I saw this firsthand in December while moderating a panel discussion on alternative credentials at NY EdTech Week. I asked if any of the 100-plus people in the audience had ever hired someone based on their having a badge. No one had. When it comes to badges, even the Design Lab's founder and director, Kathleen deLaski, acknowledges: "What we don't have proof of yet is, Do they help students get hired?" At the same time, with all the doubt about whether a college degree is a strong enough signal for employers, I recognize the potential value of badges that students from all sorts of institutions could use to prove their abilities in communication, critical thinking, resilience, and other so-called soft skills that employers claim to want. That's especially true for badges developed and vetted by a recognized organization. Lord help us if every college just starts developing its own badges with their own criteria; that would just compound the static around an already-noisy signal. [Since 2015,]( the Design Lab, a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C., has developed eight [21st Century Skills Badges]( in collaboration with a dozen colleges. Now deLaski hopes to get beyond the realm where the supposed value of badges "is all anecdotal." The idea is to test if students who earn and display badges get more interviews, get hired more quickly, or even get through the automated filters that so many employers now use in their early stages of their hiring. The design lab, working with the digital-credential company Credly as a pro bono partner, has already signed up two colleges: Langston University and the University of Maine. It will choose up to four more after the August 25 deadline for applications. It's seeking institutions "where students aren't already highly networked," deLaski says, and perhaps ones that are heavily online or adult-serving. I'm interested that employers are now directly involved. So I spoke with David Pease, senior vice president and director of talent, diversity, and inclusion at Bangor Savings Bank, which is partnering with the University of Maine on the test run. He expects that badges will help the bank identify the strongest candidates from a pool of a thousand applicants for a handful of entry-level jobs. Candidates' degrees, Pease said, "don't necessarily tell me how driven they are or how they're different from anybody else." But the badges are like "putting a star on top of your degree," he said. "It says: I have my degree. I'm ready to work." Of course, Pease is saying that after being briefed on how these badges will work. Most employers are still unfamiliar with them. And even true believers say that at this stage, badges are about as valuable to employers as LinkedIn endorsements -- which is to say, not very. That's not just me saying that. I heard the same from Shonn Colburn, who in June left an HR post at Spectrum Health, in western Michigan, to head up career services at Hope College. Despite his affection for badges, Colburn says, it could be a long time before a badge on a student's resume becomes widely understood and valued by employers. Or maybe it never will. As he put it: "It could be a passing fad." Still, he plans to continue promoting badges at Hope. The college experimented with a Design Lab badge in critical thinking this spring and eventually awarded it to 17 out of 31 students who began the pilot program. One of those students, a history major, credits the badge with helping him land a job with an international health-care consulting company. The company "didn't recognize it and say, 'Oh, that's a great thing,' " Colburn allowed. But once the student got into into his interview, "it was a conversation starter." For Colburn, that's enough, because the student was able to articulate what he had learned. "Every little bit we can do to build the skill" is valuable, he said. "That fact that we're doing deliberate things is a win." Hard to argue with that. But I still think the real revolutionary value of badges won't be realized until they can serve as a direct signal to employers -- especially for students who, as deLaski put it, aren't already "networked" through family connections or the brand name of their colleges. Happy 10th Anniversary to the Higher Education Act August marks 10 years since Congress passed a comprehensive reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. As the bipartisan Higher Learning Advocates reminded us last week, "the world has changed a lot since then." In 2008, as the policy-advocacy group notes, ride-sharing apps didn't exist and we made mixtapes on CD's. More to the point, higher ed changed a lot in that period too. In an op-ed, the organization's policy and advocacy director, Emily Bouck, and its program associate, India Heckstall, identify 10 key trends with policy implications that have helped to reshape the postsecondary education landscape over the past decade. [Their list,]( which hits on the need for better student data, the growth of bootcamps, accountability measures, and "skin-in-the-game" efforts, among others, seems to cover the bases. If I were adding to the list, I'd consider mentioning the growing hybridization of college business models, as online program managers and other companies that share revenues with colleges begin to complicate our notions of what constitutes for-profit vs. nonprofit higher education. What do you think? In lieu of a traditional 10th anniversary present of aluminum or tin, anything you'd add? Got a tip you'd like to share or a question you'd like me to answer? Let me know at [goldie@chronicle.com.](mailto:goldie@chronicle.com) If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past editions or sign up to receive your own copy, you can do so [here.]( Goldie’s Weekly Picks From The Chronicle --------------------------------------------------------------- [The Princeton Review Has Laid Off Many Employees. But Revenue Might Not Be Its Only Problem.]( By Eric Hoover The test-prep giant has is restructuring in hopes of ensuring its “financial health.” Internal documents suggest that consumers see the company as “remote and inaccessible.” [Enough ‘Do More With Less.’ It’s Time for Colleges to Find Actual Efficiencies.]( By Scott Carlson Most institutions have “zero idea how they earn a living” and where their margins are across programs, says Rick Staisloff, a consultant on finance and strategy. [The Education Dept. Wants to Hold Colleges Accountable by Reporting Graduates’ Earnings. One Problem: The Data Aren’t All There.]( [premium] By Eric Kelderman The soonest such information may be available is late 2019, but the department is likely to finalize the new policy this fall. [View the Latest Jobs in Higher Education]( [THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION] 1255 Twenty-Third St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 [Like us on Facebook]( [Follow us on Twitter]( [Add us on Google+](chroniclehighereducation/posts?elqTrackId=a982fdab94b64d63b21a2b3a3c333b6e&elq=aff2f0871c344e4dafff5fd5b6b950f7&elqaid=20205&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=9450) [Subscribe Today]( Get the insight you need for success in academe. [Stop receiving this newsletter]( Copyright © 2018 The Chronicle of Higher Education

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.