Newsletter Subject

The Edge: Some colleges are getting AI-ready. Are you?

From

chronicle.com

Email Address

newsletter@newsletter.chronicle.com

Sent On

Wed, Apr 24, 2024 11:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

New approaches for bringing artificial-intelligence literacy to campus. Plus: Is the “public-se

New approaches for bringing artificial-intelligence literacy to campus. Plus: Is the “public-service college” a viable business model? ADVERTISEMENT [The Edge Logo]( You can also [read this newsletter on the web](. Or, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, [unsubscribe](. I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed. This week I share some ideas for getting professors and others up to speed on the basics of artificial intelligence. Separately, I highlight an idea to help colleges build revenue and expand experiential-learning opportunities. ADVERTISEMENT SPECIAL OFFER FOR NEW SUBSCRIBERS Enjoying the newsletter? [Subscribe today]( for as low as $59. Take advantage of our limited- time savings event and get unlimited access to essential reporting, data, and analysis. AI is here. How is higher ed dealing? Ideas and themes from last week’s ASU+GSV Summit in San Diego are still swirling in my head, and I’ll be reporting out many of those in the months to come. No surprise, artificial intelligence, and especially the power of generative AI, was this year’s Topic A at the big confab. That’s not always an indicator of lasting relevance to higher ed (remember blockchain? MOOCs?), but AI is quite a different animal. It’s powerful and ubiquitous and likely life-changing for the world’s economy — and education. I feel hard-pressed to summarize the sentiment of 7,000-plus at ASU+GSV, or the thousands more who attended its related “[AIR Show]( (AI Revolution in Education), but Glenda Morgan, a thoughtful writer for the On EdTech blog did, offering [in a post]( that at least among this San Diego crowd, folks “seem to be getting over that annoying moral-panic phase of AI where everything seemed driven and dominated by a fear of cheating and the attempts to detect it.” Now, Morgan writes, colleges, vendors, and investors are exploring how AI might fit into education, but haven’t figured it out yet. “There are attempts at innovation and new products and services, but a lot of it feels half-hearted, like the providers themselves (whether institutions or vendors) haven’t convinced themselves they know what to do.” Morgan is more hopeful for the next year or two, when more “real-use cases designed to solve problems” might emerge and we can begin to test whether they work. I’m not sure the rest of higher ed actually is past that “moral panic” phase. Nonetheless, during ASU+GSV I did appreciate hearing about some of the ways colleges are preparing their faculty members — and students — for an AI-infused future. Two examples: - Arizona State University created a “[Teaching and Learning With Generative AI]( online course for its faculty members, to give them basic and advanced know-how about the technology and, if they chose, to help them use it in their courses. Some 1,500 took the classes. The university also made [a version of the self-paced course for other institutions](. (ASU is offering readers of The Edge a 90-percent discount on the course through September 1; use the code ChronicleASU24 at check out.) While ASU has forged [a partnership with the company that created ChatGPT]( the course covers a variety of other AI tools too. For students, the university also plans to have at least one course in AI offered by each of its colleges by the fall, Nancy Gonzales, the provost, said [during our session at ASU+GSV]( so that they too have opportunities to become AI-literate in their fields of study. - The University of Texas at San Antonio, perhaps assuming that students are already more comfortable than its faculty with the technology, is pairing professors with grad students and upper-division students in its “pedagogical partners” program. The idea is for instructors to gain a firsthand understanding of how students are already using and thinking about generative-AI tools. While the Texas program doesn’t have the reach of ASU’s offering — the UTSA’s small stipends will be offered to only about 75 pairs of faculty members and students over three semesters starting in fall — it does show that institutions don’t necessarily need big budgets to get going on AI literacy. And it makes me wonder: What are others doing to help their faculty, administrators, and students better understand AI? Are you at a college (or other organization) that has developed an interesting approach to developing understanding of AI literacy and ethics? Please [email me](mailto:goldie@chronicle.com) some details. I’ll share some of what I hear in a future newsletter. Turning “service” into a business and teaching model The Chronicle’s “[Higher Education in 2035]( report, with contributions from me and 10 others, examines some of the challenges colleges will face in the years ahead. In the report’s intro essay, one survival strategy I highlight suggests that colleges reimagine themselves as “public-service institutions” that receive revenue for advising local governments, nonprofits, and companies. They could also develop those experiences as learning opportunities for their students. That compelling idea came to me from Dennis Jones, president emeritus of the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, a nonprofit consultancy where he’s worked with states and colleges for more than 50 years. But it turns out, one of the people now trying to bring the concept to life is Jason Lane, the National Association of Higher Education Systems’ new president and a special adviser to the president of the University of Illinois system. The public-service-university idea is built upon a simple notion, Lane told me when we spoke earlier this month. “Colleges have a lot of resources that they can deploy” for the benefit of their communities. But they haven’t fully capitalized on them, he said. “One of the great untapped resources of higher education is the expertise of our faculty.” One reason I’m so intrigued by this idea is that I’ve reported extensively on academic-technology transfer, watching the ways big research universities have connected their scientific expertise to corporations and start-ups. Like Jones and Lane, I see potential for other kinds of institutions — regional publics, small privates, and community colleges — to develop a version of those tech-transfer enterprises focused on local needs. Many of those institutions are also the ones that could probably benefit from some new revenue streams. And if students could be part of the projects, gaining relevant experience as part of their academic programs, it would be a win-win all around. To be sure, many colleges offer such advisory services to local entities now, sometimes through federally funded business-development centers on their campuses. But with some intention, they could expand that model. That’s why Lane — whose new job at NASH also carries the quirky title “chief systemness officer” — is so interested. “If we’re really going to stand up and scale higher ed’s role in this,” he told me, “it needs to be through systems.” That’s probably true. I also recognize some of the downsides of that approach, but they aren’t necessarily deal breakers. For one, existing consulting firms might resent the colleges’ intrusion. But as Lane noted, “a lot of universities have expertise that is not otherwise available in their communities.” Faculty members who now do their own consulting on the side might also feel as if they’re being bigfooted by their institutions if those organizations got into the arena. But as Lane told me, there are workarounds: “Universities can build a model that continues to benefit the faculty member.” Perhaps the biggest question, however, is more a philosophical one: Service is one of the three pillars of an academic institution. So I do wonder if higher ed is really ready to try generating income from it? At the same time, given today’s financial realities, can it really afford not to? What do you think? Should colleges be exploring this model? What are some of the best opportunities? Where are the potential pitfalls? Please [get in touch](mailto:goldie@chronicle.com). I’m eager to explore this idea further, informed by your thoughts. Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, [find them here](. To receive your own copy, free, register [here](. If you want to follow me on X, [@GoldieStandard]( is my handle. Or find me on BlueSky Social, which I just joined with [the same handle](. Upcoming Workshop [The Chronicle's Administrative Leadership Institute | May 2024] [Join us in May]( for a virtual professional development program designed for administrative staff leaders. This workshop series will help participants better understand the complexities of collaboration within and between teams, and help them drive institutional initiatives. [Reserve your spot today!]( Goldie's Picks 'A REAL SENSE OF PANIC' [How the FAFSA Crisis Has Stranded the Most Vulnerable College Applicants]( By Eric Hoover [STORY IMAGE]( One day at a high school in April revealed the doubt, anger, and determination of students awaiting financial-aid offers. SPONSOR CONTENT | Queen's University Belfast [How Data Analysis Reshapes Healthcare Management]( LOW-SCORING GAME [Some Colleges Have Turned to Football to Raise Their Profile. Has It Worked?]( By Nell Gluckman [STORY IMAGE]( Researchers found almost no long-term benefits for three dozen colleges that added the sport in the last few decades. SINGLED OUT [Why Texas A&M’s Lone Black Professor of Nursing Called It Quits]( By Erin Gretzinger [STORY IMAGE]( This is what it feels like to be in the cross hairs of the campaign against DEI. CAREER RESOURCES [April article collection about salary negotiation] [Read the April collection]( to learn strategies on salary negotiation. Dive into our topics on why negotiating every offer matters, what to do if you were lowballed, and more! ADVERTISEMENT FROM THE CHRONICLE STORE [The Future of Diversity Training - The Chronicle Store]( [The Future of Diversity Training]( Diversity training for faculty and staff members is widely used across higher education. Yet there’s little agreement on whether such training is effective. [Order this report]( for insights to improve your college’s approach to building a culture that supports diversity. JOB OPPORTUNITIES [Search jobs on The Chronicle job board]( [Find Your Next Role Today]( Whether you are actively or passively searching for your next career opportunity, The Chronicle is here to support you throughout your job search. Get started now by [exploring 30,000+ openings]( or [signing up for job alerts](. NEWSLETTER FEEDBACK [Please let us know what you thought of today's newsletter in this three-question survey](. This newsletter was sent to {EMAIL}. [Read this newsletter on the web](. [Manage]( your newsletter preferences, [stop receiving]( this email, or [view]( our privacy policy. © 2024 [The Chronicle of Higher Education]( 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037

EDM Keywords (208)

yet year would world worked work wonder whether week web want view version vendors variety utsa use university universities ubiquitous two turns turned trying training topics topic told today tip throughout thousands thought thinking think themes texas technology teams teaching systems sure support summarize study students stranded states stand sport speed sometimes signing show share session services sentiment sent role rest resources reporting report receive read reach raise quits quite question providers profile president preparing powerful power post picks people past partnership part panic others organization opportunities ones one offering offered newsletter needs morgan months model may many makes lowballed low lot like life learning last lane know kinds joined investors intrigued interested intention instructors institutions insights innovation informed indicator improve ideas idea hopeful highlight help hear head handle give getting gain future forwarded forged football follow find figured fields fear fall faculty face exploring explore expertise experiences especially email education edge economy eager downsides dominated developed develop determination detect details deploy culture courses course corporations convinced contributions continues consulting connected concept complexities company companies communities comfortable come colleges college classes chronicle chose check cheating campuses campaign business building build bring bigfooted benefit begin basics basic attended attempts asu around arena approach always also already ai advertisement added actively

Marketing emails from chronicle.com

View More
Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.