Newsletter Subject

Predicting the Future

From

chrislema.com

Email Address

chris@chrislema.com

Sent On

Mon, Nov 22, 2021 07:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

Read this blog post on ​ ​ ” and it's brilliant. In fact, all I want to do in today's

Read this blog post on [chrislema.com](=)​ ​ [Predicting the Future] Predicting the Future is Impossible Predicting the future is impossible and will only highlight how wrong you are. Right? I mean, I'm the guy who said, once on a podcast, that the only thing you could know for certain about what could and couldn't be sold online was mattresses. Boy was I wrong. There are optimists out there and pessimists out there, but most of us like to be considered realists. And we're the worst. We know just enough to articulate why something can't or likely won't happen. Who should we be more like? The optimists. Because while they can't explain how something will happen, their hope that it does has borne fruit. Today I read an article that was titled, “[Betting on Unknown Unknowns]()” and it's brilliant. In fact, all I want to do in today's post, which I haven't done all year, is simply point you to this great article. In it, the CEO of [Scale.com]( states, There’s a peculiar thing where oftentimes it’s the wildly optimistic predictions that end up being right. Such predictions seem entirely crazy at the time—it feels like betting on everything going absolutely perfectly. On the contrary, they are betting on “unknown unknowns” which will meaningfully change the game. Alexandr Wang While the emphasis is my own, the point is made clear in the rest of the article. And while Alexandr is making a point about Scale, there's more in the article for us than just for the Scale employees. Three Takeaways from Betting on Unknown Unknowns Here are the three things that I came away with from that article. - Just because we can't explain the exact path that the future will take, it doesn't mean optimism is a bad choice. When rationally debating something, the logic goes, “If you can't explain it, you don't get it, and if you don't get it, then your argument fails. And if your argument fails, I can discount your conclusion.” And that's not been proven correct, no matter how much we'd like it to be true. - Predicting a logical progression of the future, based on where we are now, discounts the unknown and will likely be wrong. Again, it's our rationality that will ground us and betray us at the same time. We would do well to embrace and expect things we can't predict or explain. - People really bright and people really dumb will often sound the same when talking about the future. Do we like being smart? Or do we like sounding smart? As I read the article, I was challenged to ask myself this particular question. Because sounding smart can often sound pessimistic and being smart may come off sounding really quite similar to being dumb. Check out the Article I once told you [not to trust your gut](=). The article I've been telling you about pushes me deeper in that direction. Be sure to check out the article referenced above, “[Betting on Unknown Unknowns](),” because I think it will challenge you as much as it challenged me. And I like being challenged. I think you'll enjoy it. The post [Predicting the Future]() appeared first on [Chris Lema](. ​ Thanks for reading! If you loved it, tell your friends to subscribe. If you didn’t enjoy the email you can [unsubscribe here](. To change your email or preferences [manage your profile](. 6611 Lussier Drive, Sugar Land, TX 77479 ​[Affiliate Disclosure](​ [Built with ConvertKit]()

Marketing emails from chrislema.com

View More
Sent On

29/11/2023

Sent On

10/10/2023

Sent On

29/08/2023

Sent On

20/08/2023

Sent On

17/08/2023

Sent On

15/05/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.