Newsletter Subject

When Automation Goes Too Far

From

chrislema.com

Email Address

chris@chrislema.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 9, 2021 08:45 PM

Email Preheader Text

Read this blog post on ​ ​ Some of my posts are longer and detailed and show you how to do

Read this blog post on [chrislema.com](=)​ ​ Some of my posts are longer and detailed and show you how to do things, like this recent one on [building a membership site](. Other posts are shorter – but still useful – like this one about [one-click checkouts and my Hollywood debut](). But some, like today's, are short as they're written on the [WordPress Mobile App]() on my way to the airport. I still want to deliver value, but I also have one and only one point to make and a single thing to point you to. So that's what I'm doing. And the topic of today's post is on automation. Automations May Power Your Agency If you're an agency, you likely have spent years working on your automations. You know you need tools to help you do things, and so it's normal to bring them into your processes and speed everything up. See if any of this sounds familiar… You have an automation that sends people an email about project kickoff after they submit their first payment. But how did they make that payment? You likely sent them an invoice after they signed the contract. That was another (earlier) automation. That contract they signed? Yes, another automation, right? At your meeting where you reviewed your proposal, you showed them everything. When they said the magic words, “let's do this – send me the contract,” you tagged them in your CRM and out went the contract. Of course, we can keep going backwards. They showed up to that meeting because you likely sent them an email with a link to a calendar service like [SavvyCal](, and once they booked an appointment, the meeting was set. You get where I'm going. Automations are powerful and helpful and there's nothing wrong with them. They can power your agency. But What Happens If Automations Go Too Far? I won't talk about you. I'll tell you about me. About the time I went too far. Sound good? Here's my story. Years ago (1996-ish), we built a web application that would allow people to reserve conference rooms on a large corporate campus (Berkeley Lab). The Lab was using something called [Meeting Maker](=) and we thought we could do some things (like food ordering for meetings) a bit better. So we built in a little web form for you to tell us how many people were attending your event, what resources (A/V) you would need, and what kind of food requests you had. We then forwarded this to the cafeteria. But we needed them to acknowledge and confirm the order. Right? So we sent them an email (though at the time we seriously considered sending a fax). What do you do if they don't confirm the receipt? Obviously, you wait a bit and then send it again. So far so good, right? What happens when automations go too far? I'll tell you. You have a very uncomfortable meeting with your boss. I was called into his office to explain why we were inundating the cafeteria with email. See, our automation waited 3 days and sent a reminder / confirmation email. Then it waiting 1 day. Then half a day. Then a quarter of a day. And then every hour of the business day. You get the picture. Our algorithm was wrong. And our software was annoying in the worst way. But that's not the only way automations can go too far. What happens if you send a friend an automated email that they shouldn't get? Imagine you have a set of partners that you really trust and work with all the time. Now imagine getting a call from them and having to answer tough questions… Why? Because you've automated an outreach campaign (meant for customers) and sent them (a customer AND a partner) an email asking them to introduce themselves to you. Your automation has just insulted them. The truth is that automation can go too far because life is filled with nuances and when you don't put those things into your processes, you can end up building routines that are frustrating, ignorant, or annoying. Here's Something New I told you I wanted to point you to something new. Here it is. Check out [Reflective](=). They combine automations with manual workflows so that your nuances aren't lost. I found it a couple weeks ago and haven't had time to write about it until today. It's the perfect solution for the scenarios I've been writing about. So visit their site and [try it for free]() (free right now) and let me know what you think. The post [When Automation Goes Too Far]( appeared first on [Chris Lema](. ​ Thanks for reading! If you loved it, tell your friends to subscribe. If you didn’t enjoy the email you can [unsubscribe here](. To change your email or preferences [manage your profile](. 6611 Lussier Drive, Sugar Land, TX 77479 ​[Affiliate Disclosure](​ [Built with ConvertKit]()

Marketing emails from chrislema.com

View More
Sent On

29/11/2023

Sent On

10/10/2023

Sent On

29/08/2023

Sent On

20/08/2023

Sent On

17/08/2023

Sent On

15/05/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.