Newsletter Subject

🤝 Crain's offers Mayor Johnson an unmissable deal

From

chicagoreader.com

Email Address

reply@chicagoreader.com

Sent On

Tue, Feb 27, 2024 05:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

"Trash your ideals and abandon your political convictions." Go Sox! Daily Reader | February 27, 2024

"Trash your ideals and abandon your political convictions." Go Sox! [View this email in your browser]( [READER Logo]( Daily Reader | February 27, 2024 I was enjoying a friendly give-and-take with a liberal friend, when she said something I’ve been frequently hearing from my liberal friends. “You’re too tough on the mainstream media, Ben.” And, “They’re not as biased against Mayor Johnson as you say they are.” And . . . “Deep down inside, they want the mayor to succeed. So . . . stop picking on them!” Well, liberals, as much as I love you, I must disagree. I’m not sure many people in the mainstream media, especially the owners of the outlets, want Mayor Johnson to succeed. Not to go all “Bill Clinton” on you, but I realize that my assertion depends on how I define success. By success I mean: Johnson successfully taxes the rich to subsidize programs for the poor, which was the agenda he was elected to execute. By that measure, I can’t think of many, if any, mainstream media types (again, especially the media outlet ownership) who want Johnson to succeed. Still think I’m being too hard? Well, consider a recent editorial by the Crain’s Chicago Business editorial board, entitled “For a mayor in need of a win, here’s a potential playbook.” The gist of this editorial is that Mayor Johnson can reverse his fortune by engineering handouts to the Bears and to the White Sox for building new stadiums. Yes, you read that correctly. Not just one stadium handout, but two. That’s an astounding ask, given that the Bears still haven’t officially requested how much they want—or even where they want to build their new stadium. So it sorta amounts to a blank check for the Bears. And the White Sox are seeking a staggering handout worth hundreds of millions of dollars in sales taxes, hotel taxes, property taxes, and lord-only-knows-what-other-kinds of taxes. All in all, an even sweeter deal than the one the Sox currently enjoy—and that deal is pretty sweet. All of this for a terrible baseball team that can’t fill the stadium even when they’re winning. In endorsing the handouts, Crain’s notes that it’s been a rough few months for Mayor Johnson, with many people turning against him. But . . . “If Johnson uses the leverage that came with the job,” the Crain’s editorial board concludes, and gives the Bears and the Sox the money they want, “. . . it could go a long way toward erasing the memory of his until-now inauspicious tenure.” I laughed out loud when I read this. You call this a deal, Crain’s? Tony Soprano would offer Mayor Johnson a better quid-pro-quo than that. You want Mayor Johnson to trash his ideals, abandon his political convictions and upset his strongest supporters by, essentially, taxing the poor and middle class in order to fork over billions to the rich owners of two lousy teams. In other words: the exact opposite of what people elected him to do. And in exchange, what are you offering Mayor Johnson? An editorial pat on the head? Which may be followed by an endorsement of Paul Vallas, Alderperson Bill Conway, or whatever Great White Hope is the flavor of the day come the 2027 mayoral election. Saw the same thing happen with Mayor Lightfoot. She bent over backwards to appease the downtown business community and their media allies—and they still turned on her. I think they said she was too nasty. That’s funny, given the nasty temperaments of the mayors they adored. If this Crain’s editorial is any indication, the only thing the mainstream media (or at least the owners) want Mayor Johnson to succeed at is failure. [Logo with text: The Ben Joravsky Show. Features man wearing a cap and headphones, and Chicago flag stars.]( 🎙 [Listen to The Ben Joravsky Show]( 🎙 ◈ [The Expatriates]( by Janice Y. K. Lee. I have a new policy: don’t start a series until I’ve read the novel on which it’s based. Lee’s novel is darkly and sometimes painfully satirical. ◈ The Chicago Reader’s [Best of Chicago 2023]( ◈ Ben Joravsky (from 1989): [How much is the Sears Tower worth?]( ◈ Cook County State’s Attorney [Kim Foxx]( on MAGA’s counterattack against Fani Willis ◈ [Miles Kampf-Lassin]( from In These Times on reversing the New Deal ◈ Writer and Roosevelt University faculty member [David Faris]( on NATO, November’s election, and more [Best Chicago daily sports journalist who encourages us to explore how her chosen beat influences and draws from wider culture]( Shakeia Taylor, Chicago Tribune deputy senior content editor by [Leor Galil]( | [Read more]( → [an altar filled with candles photos and other items]( [STEAM heat]( Black Creativity Juried Art Exhibition at MSI by [Deanna Isaacs]( | [Read more]( → [Best (and largest) public art collection that is free and accessible]( Harold Washington Library by [James Hosking]( | [Read more]( → [The dancing films of Shirley Erbacher]( A local filmmaker and librarian will screen Erbacher’s experimental films in 8 mm at Sweet Void Cinema. by [Sheri Flanders]( | [Read more]( → [Review: Drive-Away Dolls]( This thriller-comedy is a fast-paced jumble of gags, but a killer cast makes it well worth watching. by [Maxwell Rabb]( | [Read more]( → You may have noticed we have a brand-new newsletter sign-up page! If you have a friend, coworker, aunt, neighbor, or anyone with an email address that you think would enjoy our newsletters, [forward this email]( to them. Check out the [new page here]( (P.S. if someone forwarded this newsletter to you, you can subscribe at the link above or scroll all the way down to the end) [Forward to a friend: the best of Chicago, every day.]( Get the latest issue of the Chicago Reader Thursday, February 22, 2024 [READ ONLINE: VOL. 53, NO. 10]( [VIEW/DOWNLOAD ISSUE (PDF)]( [Become a member of the Chicago Reader.]( [Twitter icon]( [Facebook icon]( [Instagram icon]( [LinkedIn icon]( [YouTube icon]( [Website icon]( [Logo] You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from the Chicago Reader. Want fewer emails from us? [Click here to choose what you want us to send you](. Or, [unsubscribe from all Reader emails](. We’ll miss you! [Sign up for emails from the Chicago Reader]( | [Forward this e-mail to a friend]( © 2024 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. Chicago Reader, 2930 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 102, Chicago, IL 60616

Marketing emails from chicagoreader.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.