Newsletter Subject

Who will win the April 4 mayoral runoff?

From

chicagoreader.com

Email Address

reply@chicagoreader.com

Sent On

Tue, Mar 21, 2023 04:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

Well, the response varies. The Daily Reader For the last few weeks, I’ve been asking some of th

Well, the response varies. [READER]( The Daily Reader For the last few weeks, I’ve been asking some of the best and brightest experts in Chicago politics to make a prediction. Who will win the April 4 mayoral runoff: Brandon Johnson or Paul Vallas? Not “Who do you want to win?” but “Who do you think will win?” As if you were a cold-hearted gambler placing a million dollar bet in Vegas. I have to get really specific with my question because you’d be surprised by how many of the best and brightest experts will duck and dodge to avoid directly making a prediction. And now I’m going to let you in on a little secret about the so-called experts—not just in politics but also in other areas, such as finance and sports. They don’t want to be wrong. Because if you’re an expert, you must be right. Otherwise, how can you call yourself an expert? So when you ask them to make a direct prediction, they’ll lean this way, and lean that way, and offer up some this, that, and the other thing in such a way as to avoid saying anything meaningful at all. That way they won’t be “wrong” should you replay their “prediction” after the election. But when I finally pin them down, no ducking, no dodging . . . c’mon on now, answer the question . . . Well, the response varies. If I ask a white Baby Boomer of the centrist persuasion—which politically speaking pretty much sums up that group, at least in Chicago—they will invariably predict Vallas. They can’t imagine a lefty like Brandon Johnson possibly winning. Many are jaded because the seminal moment in their political lives is the presidential election of 1972, back before their idealism was crushed. When the man they loved, George McGovern, lost to Richard Nixon, the man they despised. Ever since they think it's naive to dream a lefty candidate can actually win. Especially in Chicago, where Mayors Daley and Emanuel beat lefties for years. In fact, the only lefty ever elected mayor in Chicago was Harold Washington. A tangent . . . white Boomers have interesting memories when it comes to the 1983 mayoral election. They swear up and down they voted for Harold Washington. In this regard, they sort of remind me of Boomers who tell you they saw Hendrix at Woodstock. In reality, if all the white Boomers who claim to have voted for Harold Washington actually voted for him, Harold would have won in a landslide. Instead of barely eking out a win over Bernie Epton. In contrast, millennials of all races and ethnicities are much more likely to predict a Brandon Johnson victory. Especially if those millennials are lefties. They can’t believe a Democrat-leaning city would elect as its mayor a man who spent the last two years playing footsie with the far right. As for me, I vacillate on my predictions from day to day, depending on who I talked to last. If it’s a Boomer, I predict Vallas. If it’s a millennial, I say Johnson. It’s why talking politics with millennials is way more fun. Always leave the conversation feeling a little more hopeful about where we are heading. 🎙Listen to [The Ben Joravsky Show]( 🎙 [What Ben's Reading] [Freedom’s Dominion]( by Jefferson Cowie. Insightful explanation of how former Alabama Governor George Wallace changed politics by pleading to the sense of victimhood in white people. [Debbie-Marie Brown]( “Superheroes that look like me” [Ben Joravsky]( on Paul Vallas’ obsession with high-stakes testing. [Best of the Ben J. Show]( WBEZ editor [Alden Loury]( What are we afraid of? Sun-Times columnist [Rummana Hussain]( Paltrow products [Ben & Pat Whalen]( Oh, What a Week [Hello, Dalí]( The Art Institute mounts its first-ever solo show of the surrealist icon. by [Deanna Isaacs]( | [Read]( → [Missing girls]( Her Story Theater combines documentary and fiction in MIA. by [Katie Powers]( | [Read here]( → Get 'In the Loop'! On March 30th, we're launching a bi-monthly newsletter spotlighting the best of Chicago's performing and visual arts! [SIGN UP HERE]( [Issue of Mar. 9 – Mar. 22, 2023 Vol. 52, No. 11]( [View/Download Issue [PDF]]( [View this e-mail as a web page]( [@chicago_reader]( [/chicagoreader]( [@chicago_reader]( [Chicago Reader on LinkedIn]( [/chicagoreader]( [chicagoreader.com]( [Forward this e-mail to a friend](. Want to change how you receive these e-mails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](. Copyright © 2023 Chicago Reader, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Chicago Reader, 2930 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 102, Chicago, IL 60616

Marketing emails from chicagoreader.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.