Newsletter Subject

🗳 Here’s my advice for the mayor’s race...

From

chicagoreader.com

Email Address

reply@chicagoreader.com

Sent On

Tue, Feb 21, 2023 07:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

It’s your vote; it’s all you got. The Daily Reader My first mayoral election in Chicago wa

It’s your vote; it’s all you got. [READER]( The Daily Reader My first mayoral election in Chicago was in 1983—at least, the first in which I got to vote. I lived here in ’79, but I was registered to vote somewhere else. So I didn’t get to vote for Jane Byrne when she defeated Michael Bilandic in what we now think of as the blizzard election. But I would have. I was so excited when Byrne won, and so disappointed in how she ruled. I was also super excited when Harold Washington won in ’83. Voted for Harold and danced at his election-night party. I was thinking, “Man, mayoral elections in Chicago are a blast! It’s a celebration every time.” Yeah, right. I was happy when Washington won reelection in ’87. But he died later that year. And it’s been all downhill ever since, as mayoral elections go. Sad to say. In this regard, I’m a little like Patrick Mahomes, quarterback for the latest Super Bowl champions, the Kansas City Chiefs. Mahomes won the Super Bowl in his second year as a starter. Then two full seasons passed before he won another. Had he realized how hard it is to win a Super Bowl, he told reporters, he’d have appreciated it more the first time around. (By the way, that pretty much sums up everything that Patrick Mahomes and I have in common.) I’m bringing this up cause we have another mayoral election on the horizon. I’m pretty sure I know who I’m going to vote for. But I’m not going to tell you cause that might count as an endorsement. And we’re not allowed to do that. Though it really wouldn’t be an endorsement—more like a statement of fact. Still, you can’t be too careful about these things. A lot of people I know are freaking out. They don’t know who to vote for. They’re motivated more by who they don’t want to be mayor as opposed to who they do want to be mayor. So they’re trying to make a strategic decision. They’re trying to decide who has the best chance of beating Paul Vallas in a runoff, should it come to that. And it looks like it will come to that. So, they’re studying the polls, trying to make the best “strategic” choice. They remind me of all the strategy-minded Boomers who told me they would have voted for Bernie, but they didn’t think he could beat Trump. So they voted for Biden. They said Bernie’s best time to beat Trump was in 2016. Interestingly, they didn’t vote for him then either. Let’s face it, Boomers, you just didn’t want to vote for Bernie. Here’s my advice for the mayor’s race: vote for whoever you want for whatever reason you want. It’s only one vote out of several hundred thousands, like seeds of sands on a beach. So we all know it doesn’t really matter. And yet . . . It’s your vote. It’s all you got. So be true to yourself and let the chips fall where they may. Listen to [The Ben Joravsky Show]( [What Ben's Reading] [Erasure]( by Percival Everett. I’m systematically reading each of Everett’s 20-something novels. Everett’s brilliant—funny, wise, smart. His range of topics and knowledge seems limitless. Published in 2001, [Erasure]( is a sad and funny satire about racial prejudice and the publishing industry. It may be his best book I’ve read. [Aaron Cohen]( interviews Jimmy Burns, the great Chicago bluesman, who recently turned 80. [Ben Joravsky]( the Vallas surge: is he Chicago’s Jerry Quarry? [Best of the Ben J. Show]( State Rep. [Lakesia Collins]( her state of the state [Cassie Creswell]( look out, vouchers are coming Tribune reporter [Gregory Pratt]( what’s what in the upcoming election [The Vallas surge]( Are voters in Chicago seeking the “great white hope”? by [Ben Joravsky]( | [Read h]( → [The City Council’s “newbie caucus” prep for their first aldermanic race]( In recent interviews with the Reader, none of Mayor Lightfoot’s appointees endorsed her reelection campaign. by [Aaron Gettinger]( | [Read h]( → [A dance of contrasts]( The Joffrey’s Anna Karenina moves between darkness and light. by [JT Newman]( | [Read]( → [The next Great Migration]( In his new book, Jake Bittle makes it clear that climate change is already uprooting Americans. by [Kerry Cardoza]( | [Read here]( Calling all music lovers... [TAP IN HERE]( [Issue of Feb. 9 – Feb. 22, 2023 Vol. 52, No. 9]( [View/Download Issue [PDF]]( [View this e-mail as a web page]( [@chicago_reader]( [/chicagoreader]( [@chicago_reader]( [Chicago Reader on LinkedIn]( [/chicagoreader]( [chicagoreader.com]( [Forward this e-mail to a friend](. Want to change how you receive these e-mails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](. Copyright © 2023 Chicago Reader, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Chicago Reader, 2930 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 102, Chicago, IL 60616

Marketing emails from chicagoreader.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.