Newsletter Subject

BIG NEWS: Chicago Reader returns to weekly publication

From

chicagoreader.com

Email Address

reply@chicagoreader.com

Sent On

Sat, May 4, 2024 02:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

Catch us in print every Thursday, starting June 6. By Solomon Lieberman Soon, late in the evening on

Catch us in print every Thursday, starting June 6. [View this email in your browser]( [READER Logo]( [After four years, the Chicago Reader returns to weekly publication!]( By Solomon Lieberman Soon, late in the evening on the fifth of June, a delivery driver will drop a fresh bundle of our beautiful newspapers at one of 1,100 locations across the city. This will mark our return, after a long four years, to publishing the Chicago Reader on a weekly basis. Hell, yes. We are returning to weekly for the following reasons: Because Chicago’s creative, civic, and cultural concerns don't reproduce on a biweekly basis, nor do they circulate equitably from behind an online paywall. From Portage Park to Pullman, Chicago is a living conversation, and for the tens of thousands of people who use our printed paper that conversation doesn’t pause for two weeks so we can recapitulate it. It’s time for the Reader to get back on beat, back in rhythm, and thread together the verses and views, pictures and sounds, tastes and takes that make this the best city in the world. This return will be critical come November when Chicago heads to the polls. The last few elections came and went without a free, printed copy of the Reader to guide people or help them digest the results. Yes, we have a website that’s open 24/7, and succeeding online will ensure our future, but at present the Web isn’t enough—often it’s too much, particularly the online news ecosystem that can be as regressive and frenetic as it is impersonating. There is still great joy in picking up a paper. It packages the week in a way that a website can’t. We believe printed words and art remain a worthy public service that still have a role to play in the great American experiment that is diverse democracy. [Your support is critical to keeping the Reader going. Every. Damn. Week.]( Second, returning to weekly is a piece of a larger Reader puzzle. As we enter yet another phase of technological evolution, we, like many independent newsrooms, are pushing harder to make sure our online spaces are robust, reliable, and dynamically designed in service of our legacy and sustainability. In parallel we’re building plans to open a live space, “Reader Station,” in partnership with a core Chicago community—more on that soon. We’re also adding research to our toolbox: our first study looks at how the presence or absence of arts-and-culture journalism impacts society. These complementary efforts serve and inform our broader mission as the Reader Institute for Community Journalism: to produce and protect free, safe, public spaces for conversation and presentation, for difference and demonstration, for the bridge-building power of the arts and the power-checking ferocity of a free press. Third, there’s more money to be made. By publishing weekly we will become a “paper of record” again, allowing us to accept public notices, a consistent stream of dollars that could alone cover the increased printing costs. Additionally, and as a testament to the legacy and standing of the Reader, several advertising partners—current, lapsed, and new—agree that a weekly cadence, combined with an upgraded digital program, better serves their needs. No, this will not be a windfall. Advertising should produce about half of our $4.5 million budget—not enough to run the Reader, but it doesn’t have to be. The other half comes from the tax-deductible donations we can now accept as a nonprofit. This is still news to some, but in 2019, my predecessor, the legendary Tracy Baim, made the prescient decision to transition the Reader to a 501c3, which created the novel, hybrid revenue model that empowers our flexibility and growth today. [Check out the Reader’s latest issue for our one-of-a-kind Chicago coverage.]( Fourth, it’s in our blood. Our founders, a [bold foursome of iconoclasts]( created with the Reader a regular, striking, authentic mirror in which Chicago’s people could find themselves every Thursday. We aim to protect and revive that practice—to be dependable toll-free bridges of discovery that close the distance between Us and Them—and have a damn good time along the way. Finally, and most important to many of us, we are going weekly because the people who make the Reader, our designers, our salespeople, our communicators, editors, and writers, be they full-time or freelance, deserve the best possible vehicles for their work; the best possible shot at more reach, more impact, more reward, and more time to pass on the Reader torch. This is what our return to weekly is: A commitment to Chicago, to the arts community we adore, to equitable local journalism, to accessible democracy, to my wonderful colleagues—and to you. We love you, Chicago. You are, along with words like “transparency” and “kindness,” one of our guiding principles. As my friend and colleague, editor in chief Salem Collo-Julin, said when I asked her, yet again, why we are doing this: “Because Chicago is joy.” See you on the streets. Solomon Lieberman is CEO & Publisher of the Reader Institute of Community Journalism, the nonprofit that publishes the Chicago Reader. [PICK UP THE FIRST WEEKLY ISSUE ON JUNE 6: FIND A BOX NEAR YOU]( [Facebook icon]( [Instagram icon]( [Twitter icon]( [LinkedIn icon]( [YouTube icon]( [Website icon]( [Logo] You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from the Chicago Reader. Want fewer emails from us? [Click here to choose what you want us to send you](. Or, [unsubscribe from all Reader emails](. We’ll miss you! [Sign up for emails from the Chicago Reader]( | [Forward this e-mail to a friend]( © 2024 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. Chicago Reader, 2930 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 102, Chicago, IL 60616

Marketing emails from chicagoreader.com

View More
Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

09/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.