Newsletter Subject

🎤 Who is Lollapalooza really for?

From

chicagoreader.com

Email Address

reply@chicagoreader.com

Sent On

Wed, Mar 20, 2024 04:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

Grant Park is booked for 73 days this summer. Daily Reader | March 20, 2024 I can’t count how m

Grant Park is booked for 73 days this summer. [View this email in your browser]( [READER Logo]( Daily Reader | March 20, 2024 I can’t count how many times I thought, “This is the worst Lollapalooza lineup ever” when organizers announced it for this summer’s four-day bash. “Worst” might not be correct; it’s not outrageously awful, just mostly bland and mediocre. Who is the person who really demands to see Hozier headline Lollapalooza in 2024? [Grant Park will be partially gated off for 73 days this summer](. I lay a lot of the blame on Lollapalooza, the beachhead event for corporations claiming Grant Park for high-priced gated events. (These events have ties to Lolla, festival promoter C3 Presents, and its parent company, Live Nation. [Lolla copresented]( the inaugural Sueños Music Festival, which returns to Grant Park for the third year Memorial Day weekend; [NASCAR partnered with Four Leaf Productions]( the event promotion company helmed by C3 cofounder Charlie Jones, to book music for last summer’s ill-fated inaugural Chicago Street Race.) Is losing this much access to Grant Park worth it so the park can once again host Blink-182 and the Killers like it's the 2017 version of Lolla all over again? (SZA is great, but I’d rather see her . . . anywhere else.) I can find legitimately great acts on the Lolla lineup; I would be worried if a festival that features nearly 200 acts didn’t book a single great band, especially considering the kind of Rolodex and finances that C3 and Live Nation command. I don’t think that makes a festival worthy of praise. If you’re willing to spend at least $400 and nearly a week at a music festival, it should show you something you are excited about, ideally in a way you can’t experience anywhere else. In 2024, as in so many years before it, Lolla’s lineup feels interchangeable with so many other festivals, at best. Why spend my time there when I could travel to another festival that isn’t in a public park to see one of the handful of acts I really like? I rag on Lollapalooza a lot. I understand the criticism I receive that this festival is “not for me.” I’m 38, I have no interest in spending four straight days avoiding direct sunlight in Grant Park all for the benefit of watching a band called Post Sex Nachos play music that makes me want to claw my eyes out. Which begs the question: who is this festival for anymore? And does this lineup give them everything they could want out of a festival? Or could there be a better festival in its stead? This is part of what I consider whenever Lollapalooza announces a new lineup. Is this, the biggest festival in Chicago, actually serving the people who clamor for it? Do they, after spending as much on a ticket as I once spent on a month’s rent, really feel like they got everything they could out of the experience? Is it something they couldn’t live without, a memory that will burn as brightly as those of other summer weekends spent with friends and loved ones? Or, like me, will they feel a little resentment at the way, say, [politicians have used Lollapalooza’s veneer of cool for their own gain]( Will they wonder why they spent a precious summer weekend shuffling between stages named after tech companies and alcohol brands in search of a sound they might actually enjoy? Will they wonder if this says something about the status of music festival lineups throughout the country, or if this one fest is just not as good as they remember? ◈ [“Upward Years Are Here: Inside Nothing’s Multi-Generational Shoegaze Fest Slide Away,”]( by Eli Enis (Stereogum) ◈ [“Fire. Dog. Life. Ice,”]( by Aimee Levitt (The Delacorte Review) ◈ [“Papyrus Rap,”]( by Owen Carry (No Bells) ◈ bedbug, [pack up your bags the sun is growing]( ◈ Cola Boyy, [Prosthetic Boombox]( ◈ Lazer Dim 700, [Injoy]( ◈ Mxmrys, [Black Void Theory]( [Singer-songwriter Chaepter celebrates his first studio recording with a full-band show]( Plus: Canal Irreal drop a new album of fiercely chilly postpunk, Mush release their first full-length in five years, and more. by [Leor Galil]( | [Read more]( → [Colin Stetson brings grief and grandeur to Bohemian National Cemetery Cathedral]( by [Shannon Nico Shreibak]( | [Read more]( → [Glass Beach take one giant leap for emo on Plastic Death]( by [Leor Galil]( | [Read more]( → [a woman with curly hair standing in a photography studio]( [Erika de Casier’s retro R&B searches for totality]( by [Joshua Minsoo Kim]( | [Read more]( → It’s your last chance to save on Best of Chicago tickets! [GRAB YOUR EARLY BIRD TICKETS BEFORE MIDNIGHT!]( Get the latest issue of the Chicago Reader Thursday, March 7, 2024 [READ ONLINE: VOL. 53, NO. 11]( [VIEW/DOWNLOAD ISSUE (PDF)]( [Become a member of the Chicago Reader.]( [Facebook icon]( [Instagram icon]( [Twitter icon]( [Website icon]( [YouTube icon]( [LinkedIn icon]( [Logo] You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from the Chicago Reader. Want fewer emails from us? [Click here to choose what you want us to send you](. Or, [unsubscribe from all Reader emails](. We’ll miss you! [Sign up for emails from the Chicago Reader]( | [Forward this e-mail to a friend]( © 2024 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. Chicago Reader, 2930 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 102, Chicago, IL 60616

Marketing emails from chicagoreader.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.