Newsletter Subject

Dude, Where's My Self-Driving Car?

From

chartr.co

Email Address

daily@chartr.co

Sent On

Sun, Nov 12, 2023 05:51 PM

Email Preheader Text

Hi, today we explore: the latest on autonomous vehicles. TOGETHER WITH Today's Topics Good morning!

Hi, today we explore: the latest on autonomous vehicles. TOGETHER WITH Today's Topics Good morning! When Hollywood portrays the future, two of its go-to tropes are AI-powered robots and self-driving cars. But, nearly a year on from ChatGPT’s seminal public launch — and with headlines about new AI tools and bots dominating the tech sections of news outlets on an almost daily basis — we’re asking: where’s my self-driving car? Today’s Chartr is sponsored by [Incogni]( the personal data removal service created by Surfshark. [Incogni]( protects your data from falling into the hands of data brokers and scammers, so you never have to answer an annoying spam call again. [Check it out]( [Read this on the web instead]( Hands off the wheel It’s not unreasonable to have expected some major breakthroughs in self-driving cars (autonomous vehicles or AVs) in the same year that AI “went mainstream” — they are, of course, deeply intertwined technologies. Indeed, the only way we’re going to get the ability to sit back while our car drives us safely to our destination, is with the development of AI — along with an array of sensors, cameras, and radar systems. But, it may feel like progress has stalled in recent years. Indeed, just this week, the AV giant Cruise began [laying off]( contingent workers who supported its driverless fleet. The layoffs follow [a recall]( of 950 of its self-driving vehicles in response to an incident from October in which a pedestrian was hit into the path of a Cruise car by a human driver, and then dragged some 20 feet by the self-driving vehicle as it attempted to pull over. The word “recall” in this context actually refers to a software update, which the company says would have kept the Cruise AV stationary after the incident had it been in effect, but the California DMV had already suspended Cruise’s driverless permits in light of the October crash. The logic of the Cruise vehicle was to get out of the way of other oncoming traffic, presumably to avoid another potential accident. Of course, with a pedestrian entangled with the vehicle, that’s clearly not the “[desired post-collision response](. Trolley problems Although in this case there seems to be room for improved software, the incident raises the classic ethical dilemma for AV scientists and researchers: in the event of an unavoidable accident, how should software “prioritize” the safety of humans? Should it first check if there is anyone that looks like a child, or a vulnerable individual, at risk, and prioritize their safety? Should it prioritize the passengers in the car, or people outside of the vehicle? How should it “think" about animals — is it okay to swerve to avoid a cat running across a road if it creates a 1% chance of causing an accident? What about a 5% chance? How long should it take to work all of this out if it needs to act quickly? These questions — part of a wider set of thought experiments often referred to as "trolley problems" — clearly don't have perfect answers, and remain a sticking point for engineers, designers... and the wider public. Indeed, a [survey]( from Pew Research Center found that, when asked whether self-driving cars should prioritize those in or out of the vehicle, a whopping 41% said they weren’t sure, 40% said the passengers of the vehicle itself and 18% said those outside of the car. Waymore miles Cruise's difficulties are undoubtedly a setback for the industry — and Cruise’s owner General Motors — but it's important to get some perspective on all of the progress that has been made. According to [reports filed]( with California’s DMV, autonomous vehicles racked up nearly 5.7 million miles of driving last year. The vast majority, 5.1 million or so, were done with a safety driver present, in case of the need to intervene. Cruise managed the second most miles, but it was Waymo, the self-driving arm of Google (Alphabet), that reported the most mileage in its report: an astonishing ~2.9 million miles. For context on just how far that is, it’s roughly equivalent to driving from LA to New York and back again, more than 500 times. Other leaders in the industry that racked up significant mileage included Zoox, Pony.ai and Apple — the latter of which continues to work on AV technology in its typically [secretive fashion](. Tesla is the other major player in self-driving technology in the US, but the company defines its FSD (Full Self-Driving) beta as a [“driver-assisted” technology]( rather than a full autonomous vehicle, allowing it to skip the official reporting of any testing to the state of California. But, Tesla’s own reports suggest that more than half a billion (with a b) miles have now been covered by Tesla’s FSD beta. [Sponsored by Incogni]( How did you get my number? Spam calls are a headache…at best. At worst, they can end in identity fraud or financial scams. So don’t pick up, right? Easier said than done. Scammers are known to use numbers that don’t appear suspicious, and even answering with a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ can give them leverage. The long-term solution is filing a lot of [data deletion requests]( with data brokers. That would take the average person 304 hours…of tedious interactions. [Incogni]( handles the data brokers for you, wiping your personal info from hundreds of dangerous databases. And with spam calls set to increase over the Black Friday period, [Incogni]( are offering a discount you can rely on: use code CHARTR to [get 60% off]( Incogni annual plans. [Protect your personal data with 60% off Incogni]( Level up The end-goal for self-driving cars is complete automation, where no human attention or manual input is required — a state known as level 5, on the [industry scale]( for vehicle autonomy. Level 1 automation, which would include features like lane-keeping and cruise control, has been standard on some models for years, and some level 2 features, like steering or acceleration assistance, are now commonplace in high-end vehicles. Predictions of when fully autonomous cars make their way into mainstream adoption have, historically, been way too optimistic. Elon Musk believes that Tesla is “[very close]( to delivering on level 4 or 5 self-driving, although it’s worth noting that similar comments have been made by Tesla's head honcho in years gone by. What is easy to predict: getting to level 5 is going to continue requiring an enormous amount of money. Are we there yet? Data from [Crunchbase]( reveals that the amount of venture capital funding being poured into AVs has fallen sharply from its peak, and the willingness of industry incumbents to invest billions into projects with uncertain timelines also seems to be fading. Cruise, for example, [reportedly]( only has 9 months of cash left, having burned through more than $8 billion since 2017, and this week a senior executive at Honda, which has also invested heavily into the company, said it had no plans to invest more. Waymo cut 100 jobs earlier this year, Ford-backed Argo AI has already shut down, and the pivot to electric vehicles is proving enough of an expense for many manufacturers, without the added complication of building full autonomy. Even as AI hype grows by the day, the road to full self-driving suddenly seems a little longer. [Sponsored by Incogni]( Too good to be true Most of us know a sketchy offer when we see one. But come Black Friday season, price slashes are the norm — and it’s harder to tell a discount from a dodgy vendor. With an end-to-end data deletion service, [Incogni]( stops scammers in their tracks. [Incogni]( wipes your personal info from dangerous databases so that your data is safe, on Black Friday and beyond. Save yourself the scam (and [60% on Incogni]( annual plans) with code CHARTR. Like this deep dive? We'd love if you shared with friends, family or colleagues, and of course we appreciate any support for our sponsors that keep this newsletter free to read, as it has been for 4+ years. [Read or share this story on the web]( *Sponsored content from Incogni. Thanks for reading. See you tomorrow, when we return to our regular scheduled programming! Have some [feedback](mailto:daily@chartr.co?subject=Feedback&body=Hi%2C%0A%0AI%20like%20the%20newsletters%2C%20but%20I%20had%20a%20thought%20for%20you...) or want to [sponsor]( this newsletter? Not a subscriber? Sign up for free below. [Subscribe]( Copyright © 2023 CHARTR LIMITED, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website. Our mailing address is: CHARTR LIMITED 231 Vauxhall Bridge RoadLondon, SW1V 1AD United Kingdom [Add us to your address book]( Don't want charts in your inbox anymore? Break our hearts and [unsubscribe](.

Marketing emails from chartr.co

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

20/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.