Hi, today weâre exploring: (1) Redditâs advertising business, (2) The amount of âstuffâ weâre launching into space and (3) Gucciâs woes. Today's Topics Good morning! Itâs Friday, congratulations. Today weâre exploring: - Reddit vs. Meta: No social company makes money from ads quite like Meta.
- Space stuff: Weâre launching more stuff into orbit... way more.
- Not-so-Gucci: Keringâs flagship brand is struggling. Have feedback for us? Just hit reply â we'd love to hear from you! [Read this on the web instead]( WallStreetBets Ticker RDDT began trading on the New York Stock Exchange yesterday, as Reddit became the first social media platform to go public since Pinterest in 2019, with investors aggressively [upvoting Redditâs shares]( which closed 48% above the initial offering price. Investors presumably see potential in the company, which currently monetizes its users at a fraction of what industry giant Meta achieves. Last quarter, Meta reported making $12+ for every one of its global daily active users across its Family of Apps... while Reddit reported a more modest $3.42 of revenue per daily active user. Indeed, despite its uniquely organized communities, which should theoretically be an advertiserâs dream, Reddit is yet to turn its model into a profitable one, reporting a loss every year since its founding [in 2005]( (to the tune of $91 million last year). r/training However, Reddit might not have to rely on advertising forever. Its unique topic-focused structure has become a valuable reservoir of content and data for training AI models; in fact, the company struck a $60 million [licensing deal]( with Google last year. Zooming out: Yesterdayâs debut values the company at ~$8 billion, smaller than peers like Snapchat ($18bn) and Pinterest ($23bn), and less than 1/100th of Metaâs valuation (nearly $1.3 trillion). Hard launch We are launching more stuff into space than ever before. Indeed, us Earth-dwellers launched a record-breaking 2,664 objects into space last year⦠with the US â be that American companies or government agencies â responsible for 81% of them. Thatâs per recent numbers from the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), via [Our World in Data]( which revealed that the number of objects launched into space (everything from satellites to crewed spacecrafts) rose by almost 200 in 2023. Brave new world Decades on from the space race, the boom in launches has been [variously attributed]( to lower launching costs, cheaper parts to build satellites and spacecrafts, and the rise of the private space industry, with companies like Elon Muskâs SpaceX turning space exploration â that used to be a government-only-affair â into big business. As of last December, Muskâs company was responsible for more than 80% of commercial space launches in the US [in 2023](. While thereâs clearly rapid progress being made in the space space, some are starting to ask at what cost: for example, piles of junk and debris have been amassing [over decades]( as Earth-orbiting objects deteriorate, which could [artificially brighten]( the night sky and cause other unwanted [side effects](. Gravity comes for Gucci After years of strong growth (pandemic aside), Gucci is falling out of favor. The brandâs parent company, Kering, has warned that sales of its flagship brand are expected to be down ~20% year-on-year in the first quarter. The announcement sent shares in [Kering down 14%]( wiping more than $6 billion off the companyâs value, as demand in the crucial Asia-Pacific region softens. In 2023, Gucci sold nearly $11 billion of luxury goods, making up over half of Kering's total revenue and nearly two-thirds of its [profits](. Now, as the flagship brand's allure dims in China â which has been the engine of its growth for much of the last decade â Kering will look to the remainder of its budget-breaking portfolio of labels, including Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, and Balenciaga, to make up the difference. Solo misery Misery loves company... but unfortunately for Kering, its sales woes are mostly its own, with rival luxury behemoths LVMH and Hermès both announcing double-digit sales growth recently. Indeed, Gucci rides economic cycles arguably more strongly than other high-end labels, with the buzz surrounding its designers appealing to â[aspirational shoppers]( â think people who might own 1 or 2 luxury pieces rather than an entire wardrobe â who are often the first to cutback on luxury spending in downturns. Company execs will be hoping that a burst of creativity from a [new designer]( will get Gucci back to being Gucci. More Data ⢠Is Pepsi okay? Subway stores are switching out Coca-Cola drinks for PepsiCo offerings across the US for the next 10 years [from 2025](. ⢠Donald Trumpâs Truth Social, a social media platform that had just ~860k [monthly users]( at the most recent estimates, is [reportedly preparing]( to go public at a $6 billion valuation. ⢠Nvidiaâs latest hot product is a $50 company-branded [Stanley cup](. Hi-Viz ⢠The crops that stand the best chance in a [changing climate](. ⢠A great visual exploration from [Rest Of World]( on generative AIâs tendencies to stereotype. Off the charts: Which company, that has just announced a 50:1 [share split]( were we charting about last October? [Answer below]. [Answer here](. Thanks for stopping by!
Have some [feedback](mailto:daily@chartr.co?subject=Feedback&body=Hi%2C%0A%0AI%20like%20the%20newsletters%2C%20but%20I%20had%20a%20thought%20for%20you...) or want to [sponsor]( this newsletter? Not a subscriber? Sign up for free below. [Subscribe]( Copyright © 2024 CHARTR LIMITED, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website. Our mailing address is: CHARTR LIMITED 231 Vauxhall Bridge RoadLondon, SW1V 1AD
United Kingdom
[Add us to your address book]( Don't want charts in your inbox anymore? Break our hearts and [unsubscribe](.