Newsletter Subject

This Electric-Vehicle Maker Is an 'Illusionist' on Wall Street

From

chaikinanalytics.com

Email Address

powerfeed@exct.chaikinanalytics.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 28, 2024 01:47 PM

Email Preheader Text

If you've ever seen an illusionist in person, it's an incredible experience. These magicians can see

If you've ever seen an illusionist in person, it's an incredible experience. These magicians can seemingly make things vanish. [Chaikin PowerFeed]( [TOMORROW: A Critical Election-Year Event Is Headed for U.S. Stocks ➤]( This Electric-Vehicle Maker Is an 'Illusionist' on Wall Street By Pete Carmasino, chief market strategist, Chaikin Analytics If you've ever seen an illusionist in person, it's an incredible experience. These magicians can seemingly make things vanish. I once saw one of these performances at the Mirage hotel in Las Vegas. It featured white tigers suspended over the crowd that could "disappear." And it was held by the iconic duo of Siegfried Fischbacher and Roy Horn – known professionally as Siegfried and Roy. Between 1990 and 2003, the pair was as famous as the great magician Harry Houdini. Siegfried and Roy had been working with jungle cats for more than four decades. And in the span of their 13 years at the Mirage, their act – which featured illusions – was famous on the Vegas Strip. But in 2003, a tragic turn of events brought things to an end... During a show in October that year, Roy was attacked by a white tiger. It took four men and a fire extinguisher to get the tiger to release him. Roy suffered massive blood loss and was partially paralyzed on one side of his body. It was a terrible end to a popular show. Night after night, Siegfried and Roy entertained audiences with jungle cats and magic. Of course, everyone knew they didn't actually make the tigers disappear. It was an illusion. And right now, an illusion is much like what electric-vehicle ("EV") maker Rivian Automotive (RIVN) does to billions of investors' dollars. The management at this company makes money "disappear." And as I'll explain today, I'm afraid it will also come to a tragic end for investors... Recommended Links: [Wall Street Veteran Names No. 1 Election-Year Stock]( You could be sitting on over $75,000 in profits if you had followed his system's "buy" signals for 2023. Now, he's stepping forward with a critical market prediction for the 2024 election year... including his No. 1 stock to buy NOW. [Full details here](. ['I Found the Answer to Retirement']( A man from New York came forward with his unique story of how he retired early and worry-free WITHOUT stocks... thanks to ONE single idea that anyone can use. Now he sees 16%-plus annual returns with legal protections... and he NEVER has to worry about another market crash again. [Get the full story right here](. Now, this isn't the first time I've discussed Rivian. Back in [December 2022]( I explained that the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index had chosen Rivian as its newest member. At the time, RIVN shares were trading around $25. And I thought the move was "virtue signaling" because it couldn't have been for the fundamentals of Rivian's business. The company was hemorrhaging cash. In 2022, it had lost almost $7 billion. But the worst part is that investors eventually saw the "illusion" of a turnaround... After the stock slid lower in early 2023, it eventually started to turn higher by the middle of the year. And by June 6, after months of "neutral" and "bearish" ratings, the Power Gauge flipped to "bullish." That day, RIVN shares closed at $14.50. Remember, our system uses 20 factors to review a stock's fundamental and technical indicators... The reason for the turn to "bullish" is the way the Power Gauge read the data. Rivian did report better sales, so metrics like the price-to-sales ratio improved... as did the near-term technical indicators. You see, Rivian gave investors the illusion of a good stock. Both the Power Gauge and the Wall Street community began to increase their ratings – basing the changes on Rivian's improving outlook and results. And by the end of July, the stock had hit a high of nearly $28 per share. But then the stock slowly started to drift lower. And on December 4, the Power Gauge made a change to the downside. Rivian's rating went from "bullish to "neutral" that day, with shares closing at $17.74. And then, the Power Gauge turned even lower – flipping Rivian's rating to "bearish" on January 16. Today, Rivian is still "bearish" in our system. In the chart below, you can see how it played out... [Chaikin PowerFeed] But it seems that Wall Street hasn't caught on yet. Today, 54% of the analysts that cover Rivian still have a "buy" rating on it. And only 14% have a "sell" rating. Sure, Rivian's improvement in 2023 versus 2022 in terms of sales is a positive. But in the end, the company's loss from operations totaled $5.7 billion in last year. Folks, the "tigers" didn't disappear. And Rivian still lost billions in 2023. Indeed, after the company reported earnings last week, RIVN shares collapsed by nearly 26% the next day. A peek behind the curtain using the Power Gauge tells us Rivian is a stock to avoid for the foreseeable future. Good investing, Pete Carmasino Market View Major Indexes and Notable Sectors # Hld: Bullish Neutral Bearish Dow 30 -0.27% 13 16 1 S&P 500 +0.19% 202 223 73 Nasdaq +0.24% 44 48 8 Small Caps +1.39% 514 1020 381 Bonds -0.69% Utilities +1.89% 4 13 12 — According to the Chaikin Power Bar, Large Cap stocks and Small Cap stocks are Bullish. Major indexes are mixed. * * * * Sector Tracker Sector movement over the last 5 days Discretionary +2.89% Information Technology +2.57% Industrials +2.18% Materials +1.93% Financial +1.72% Energy +1.3% Utilities +1.14% Health Care +1.11% Staples +0.59% Communication +0.47% Real Estate +0.05% * * * * Industry Focus Bank Services 51 37 2 Over the past 6 months, the Bank subsector (KBE) has underperformed the S&P 500 by -1.22%. However, its Power Bar ratio, which measures future potential, is Very Strong, with more Bullish than Bearish stocks. It is currently ranked #5 of 21 subsectors and has moved up 1 slot over the past week. Top Stocks [rating] APO Apollo Global Manage [rating] BPOP Popular, Inc. [rating] NTRS Northern Trust Corpo * * * * Top Movers Gainers [rating] NCLH +19.84% [rating] CEG +16.92% [rating] CCL +7.65% [rating] AZO +6.66% [rating] ALB +5.82% Losers [rating] IFF -3.84% [rating] SBAC -3.77% [rating] HSIC -3.38% [rating] HES -3.09% [rating] AES -2.89% * * * * Earnings Report Reporting Today Rating Before Open After Close NRG CRM DLTR HPQ, MNST, VTRS XRAY PARA No earnings reporting today. Earnings Surprises [rating] AMT American Tower Corporation Q4 $0.25 Missed by $-0.69 [rating] SPLK Splunk Inc. Q4 $3.03 Beat by $1.07 [rating] CPNG Coupang, Inc. Q4 $0.08 Beat by $0.02 [rating] AXON Axon Enterprise, Inc. Q4 $1.12 Beat by $0.27 [rating] CEG Constellation Energy Corporation Q4 $1.51 Missed by $-0.51 * * * * You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to PowerFeed. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from PowerFeed, [click here](. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call [+1 (877) 697-6783 (U.S.)](tel:18776976783), 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Eastern time or e-mail info@chaikinanalytics.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2024 Chaikin Analytics, LLC. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Chaikin Analytics, LLC. 201 King Of Prussia Rd., Suite 650, Radnor, PA 19087. [www.chaikinanalytics.com.]( Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Chaikin Analytics, LLC, does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Chaikin Analytics forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Chaikin Analytics, LLC (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from chaikinanalytics.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.