Newsletter Subject

Biggest mistake in investing

From

chaikinanalytics.com

Email Address

info@exct.chaikinanalytics.com

Sent On

Sat, Jul 6, 2024 02:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Here is a story about what not to do... It's really important that you read it, regardless of whethe

Here is a story about what not to do... It's really important that you read it, regardless of whether you decide my top stock strategy for the next 5+ years is right for you or not. This is one of the most important lessons in all of investing (and the solution), no matter what approach you choose. [Chaikin Analytics] Dear Reader, Here is a story about what not to do... It's really important that you read it, regardless of whether you decide my [top stock strategy for the next 5+ years]( is right for you or not. This is one of the most important lessons in all of investing (and the solution), no matter what approach you choose. I've already shown you – [with proof]( – that: - Small-cap stocks historically outperform the big ones that everybody buys by as much as 4x over the long term. - They're poised to outperform the S&P 500 by as much as 4x just in the next year, based on a historical signal with a perfect track record. - An even more overlooked group – mid-caps – could do better still. (No one "gets" this and it's probably the single most overlooked opportunity in the entire market.) - With my stock-rating system, the Power Gauge, and my nearly 50 years of studying smaller stocks (and being an entrepreneur myself)... I fully expect to [show a small group of readers even higher potential gains, beginning immediately.]( Quite possibly high triple-digits or more. Having said that... Smaller doesn't automatically mean better. I know my readers are too smart for that. Smaller stocks are where you'll find companies with paper-thin financials... dubious business models... and even outright frauds. And many of these same companies "sound" great. They know how to market their "story" about changing the world... raking in money... and making early investors a fortune. If you've spent any time in the markets – or financial research, for that matter – I'm sure you're familiar with this. The single biggest risk for any investor is getting sucked in by these "stories" – and refusing to change your view, no matter the evidence. And it doesn't just happen to a handful of inexperienced market "gamblers." It happens to the very best investors in the world. [(I explain the dead simple way to avoid that risk, right here.)]( Perhaps you've seen one of the films about how many very smart folks got taken in by the Theranos fraud, for example. Theranos never traded in the public markets. But the same kind of thing definitely happens in publicly traded stocks. And if you're going to be a small- or mid-cap investor, it's the No. 1 thing you need to avoid. For example, about 9 years ago, a company called SunEdison got very popular. It was going to be the biggest developer of solar projects in the world. And back then, solar was a very hot sector. Famous hedge funds like Omega Advisors and Glenview Capital Management were pouring in. The biggest cheerleader was David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital. Now, Chaikin Analytics was not around back then in its current form... But I will tell you that I saw this idea mentioned in quite a few financial newsletters at the time. It was a bit of a "darling." And guess what? It ran up as much as 2,000% during one period. (You might call it the "hype" phase.) I know you probably see where this is going... But don't ignore how much "fear of missing out" a lot of folks probably felt during that 2,000% run. SunEdison promised massive dividends... and basically a whole new way of making money that no one had ever thought of before. But, to put it bluntly, it wasn't a real business. It was a whole lot of financial engineering. It didn't have any real technological advantage. What it did have was an impossibly complex financial structure, with spin-offs and so-called "funding warehouses." As the Financial Times put it: "It used the slogan 'Simplifying Solar', but its corporate structure was exactly the opposite." Anyway, I'll get to the point... SunEdison was a ZERO. Within a couple of years, it was bankrupt. And the New York Times estimates that those eager hedge funds that piled in lost a collective $3.5 billion. And if this kind of mistake can suck in David Einhorn and some of the smartest hedge funds in the world... It can certainly get you and me, too. [The solution is to have an objective, outside way to "keep you honest"]( – and honor what it tells you. I spent half a century building a tool like that... And I never make the mistake of thinking that I'm smarter than the signal. I'm human. I make mistakes. Like you... David Einhorn... and everybody else... I can get sucked in by a good "story." [But I never let that ruin my financial results because I have the Power Gauge to keep me honest.]( And it's why I'm so excited to take advantage of the most historically lucrative area of the entire market... [The stocks Warren Buffett laments he can't "play" in anymore (but we can)...]( Without undue risk. Again, I hope you'll take this lesson to heart no matter what investing strategy you choose. Nothing is more important. [I also hope you'll take full advantage of the highest-upside market setup I've ever seen... knowing we have the Power Gauge to "keep us honest" every day.]( Unfortunately, your invitation to try this ends on Monday. Please look it over today, before time runs out. [Click here for full details.]( Regards, Marc Chaikin Founder, Chaikin Analytics P.S. The invitation I'm making today includes full, unrestricted access to a more advanced version of my Power Gauge tool (normally $5,000 per year by itself) for FREE... On top of HALF OFF my newest research service and a slew of additional FREE bonuses worth thousands. Meaning you can use the Power Gauge to stay "honest" on every investment opportunity, big or small. It's the work of my entire professional lifetime. [And this is – by far – the No. 1 best way I've ever found to put it to work.]( You are receiving this e-mail because you are a subscriber to Chaikin Analytics content. To unsubscribe from special offers like this one, [click here to unsubscribe](. Published by Chaikin Analytics, LLC. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call [+1 (877) 697-6783](tel:18776976783) (U.S.), 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Eastern time or e-mail info@chaikinanalytics.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Chaikin Analytics, LLC. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Chaikin Analytics, LLC. 201 King Of Prussia Rd., Suite 650, Radnor, PA 19087. [www.chaikinanalytics.com](.

Marketing emails from chaikinanalytics.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

26/11/2024

Sent On

11/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.