Newsletter Subject

Doug Casey on Trump’s Presidency So Far

From

caseyresearch.com

Email Address

subscribers@exct.caseyresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Jul 27, 2018 08:08 PM

Email Preheader Text

Trouble viewing this e-mail? Justin?s note: Readers can?t get enough of Doug Casey. I know becau

Trouble viewing this e-mail? [Click here to read it online]( [CASEY DAILY DISPATCH - Casey Research] Justin’s note: Readers can’t get enough of Doug Casey. I know because I look at emails from readers every day. And anytime we feature Doug—no matter the subject—the response is overwhelming. So much so that, from now on, we’re featuring Doug in the Dispatch every Friday. And today’s installment may be our best (and most controversial) Conversations With Casey yet. Below, Doug tells me what he thinks of Donald Trump’s presidency so far. I think you’ll enjoy… --------------------------------------------------------------- Doug Casey on Trump’s Presidency So Far Justin: Doug, what do you think of Trump’s presidency so far? What’s he done well? Where’s he fallen short? Doug: Let me start by saying that I’m very pleased that Trump was elected because, first and foremost, he’s not Hillary. In addition, he’s never been in political office. So he lacks some of the vices common to professional politicians. Even better, all members of the Deep State reflexively hate him. That’s a good thing, because there’s some truth to the meme “the enemy of my enemy just might be my friend.” I also like some of the things Trump’s done since he’s been in office—besides driving liberals and Deep Staters insane. He’s done some deregulating—not nearly enough, but he’s moved in the right direction. Of course, he did this not because he understands Austrian economics, but simply because he’s a businessman. He has some personal experience with the destructiveness of regulations. Of course, he hasn’t done nearly enough yet. He’s just mowing the grass and trimming the hedges. He should be pulling these things out by their roots and sowing Agent Orange where they grew. The same goes for taxes. His tax cut was helpful, but not drastic. And there hasn’t been a cut in spending. In fact he’s significantly increasing spending. So the tax cut is mainly cosmetic. The government will extract those resources from the economy, mainly by selling more debt. Recommended Link ["Cryptocurrency history will be made in 2018... but most people will miss the boat."]( "However, if you're prepared to take swift, decisive action, then you may have the chance to make 10X, 21X, or 32X your money over the next few months... I'm willing to guarantee you'll have the chance to see at least 1,000% by this time next year... even if you never buy bitcoin in your life." [DETAILS HERE.]( -- Justin: And where has he fallen short or failed? Doug: A number of ways, starting with running a trillion-dollar deficit. Where does he think that money’s going to come from? The Russians and the Chinese aren’t buying US debt anymore. Foreigners are looking to offload US paper. Americans aren’t buying much, either. The only real alternative is to sell it to the Federal Reserve. Which is a real problem when the Federal Reserve is not only trying to deleverage, but has to refinance hundreds of billions of short-term paper coming due. Recall that almost all the $20 trillion of Treasury debt is very short term. Interest rates are going to rise, a lot. And so will the interest portion of the government deficit. Interest payments alone will be a trillion a year by the end of Trump’s second term—assuming he gets one. Trump also—like all red-blooded Americans—loves the military. So, he’s adding to the already bloated military budget. It’s ridiculous, dangerous, and provocative. The United States already spends more than the next 10 or 12 biggest nations in the world put together. And most of that money is wasted and misallocated. It’s being spent on dinosaur technologies. What he’s doing there is very foolish. It’s accelerating the looming bankruptcy of the Government. And of course the Government will drag the country down with it. He’s foolishly antagonizing the Russians by placing troops in the Baltics. He’s doing the same with China by sending ships to the South China Sea, which is their equivalent of the Gulf of Mexico. But my biggest problem with Trump is that he has no philosophical core. He’s not by any means a libertarian. He’s a pragmatist, and an authoritarian. He’ll do whatever seems like a good idea at the time. He’s got no background in or understanding of economics or history. I think it’s true that, as his critics say, he hasn’t read a book in 50 years. He goes strictly on gut instinct. On the bright side, some of his instincts are pretty good. For instance, he can see that the culture of the US has changed radically over the last 30 years. And if mass immigration from backward countries continues this place will soon be unrecognizable. These people—unlike immigrants up to the 1950s—have values that are actually antithetical to those that made America what it is. Justin: Yeah, Trump doesn’t follow any sort of playbook. So, what do you think about what he’s accomplished with North Korea? Doug: I think he needs to be complimented for reaching out to baby Kim and establishing a personal relationship with him. It’s very interesting, and highly disturbing, that the Deep State called this outreach treasonous and dangerous. It shows how insane these Beltway creatures have become. I mean it’s a good idea for him to be personally friendly with the head of an antagonistic power. It reduces the chance of war. That’s absolutely true for what he’s doing with Putin as well. Trump is to be congratulated for disregarding the media, the talking heads, academics, and State Department bureaucrats. Horrible people, captured by bad ideas. I’ve read things that these morons have written. They’re saying he gave away the store. They’re crazy. They’re proof there actually is a clinical condition called TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome. For one thing Russia is a complete non-threat. It’s a gas station with an attached gun store in the middle of a wheat field. Their economy is smaller than Florida’s. They’re not a threat to anybody—alcoholism is rampant, the Russian population is in collapse, and they’re being undermined by massive Mohammedan migration from the Stans to Russia’s south. Sure, they have nuclear weapons. So, it’s a good idea to be friendly with the Russians, if only because of that. But Putin and Russia are not a danger in any way whatsoever. Including a few guys spending $100,000 on Facebook to influence the 2016 election. Recommended Link [The Ultimate Retirement Side Hustle?]( I've discovered a way you can pocket easy cash. You don't have to leave your home or deal with difficult people. But you do need to [see the video at this link](. Hurry! It goes away at exactly midnight this Sunday... It could be your last chance to learn how to [pocket as much as $36,000 or more in easy, extra money.]( -- Justin: So, what do you think of the narrative that Trump’s a Russian asset? Doug: It’s ridiculous. Everything that the media’s saying about Trump and Russia is completely counterfactual. There’s no evidence for this at all. Is it possible that they taped him doing naughty things with local working girls when he visited? Of course. That’s the type of things all governments, including our own, do as a matter of policy. Does that compromise him? No. It’s well known he’s always been a ladies man, as was JFK. But he’s never been accused of multiple sex crimes, as has Clinton. Trump is a nationalist. It would run against Trump’s psychology to purposely act against US interests. It’s crazy. It tells me that the Democratic party is completely unhinged. They’re watching a different movie than the real world. Still, I respect the Democrats much more than the Republicans. By that I mean the Democrats say all sorts of crazy things, but they believe them. They’re sincere. They’re not hypocrites. Republicans, on the other hand, say they believe in free markets, freedom, and all sorts of intelligent things. But they don’t believe in any of this stuff. They’re completely insincere. Disgusting hypocrites. And everybody hates a hypocrite. So, take your choice: crazy and sincere or somewhat rational sounding and insincere. Justin: So, you approve of how Trump’s dealt with Russia and North Korea? And what about how he’s dealt with our allies, specifically in Europe? Doug: I like the way Trump is handling the European leaders, all of whom are nothing-nobody socialist bureaucrats. Unworthy people run all these western European countries. He’s actually treating them with more respect than they deserve. They’re not real allies. They’re just Rent-an-allies, and very costly ones. Justin: What about Trump’s suggestion that other European countries should kick in more for defense spending? Doug: It’s one of Trump’s real problems. The U.S. is already bankrupt and sinking deeper into debt. He shouldn’t be asking Europeans to raise defense spending. That’s asking for trouble. It’s going to make things worse for everybody. Why, with their history of constant wars, should Europe be encouraged to become more militaristic? Who are they trying to defend themselves against? Not the Russians. They aren’t going to attack. Nobody’s going to attack Europe, including the Chinese. These aren’t the days of the Roman Empire where warfare was a profitable venture, because after you won you got to enslave the men and steal the women, gold, cattle, and artwork, and take everything back to Rome. Economies don’t work that way anymore. Today, warfare is strictly a money-losing and capital-destroying enterprise. So, it’s foolish for Trump to ask them to raise defense spending. It’s counterproductive. It will only provoke the Russians and Chinese. Instead, we should be talking about disbanding the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). It serves no useful purpose. It should have been disbanded 25 years ago. NATO is proof of how it’s almost impossible to get rid of a bureaucracy—no matter how worthless and dysfunctional. Instead of asking them to raise their spending, he should radically cut US military spending. And by “radically,” I mean 50% for openers and then 50% again. This is a huge mistake on his part. But my biggest worry with Trump is the economy. The US is long overdue for a very serious collapse. And the next crash will be much worse than what we had in 2008. And I’m afraid it will happen on his watch. Justin: What could happen if the economy collapses while Trump’s in office? Doug: It would play right into the hands of the Democratic Party, which has become nothing more than a cesspool, dominated by Progressives, and worse. They’ll put up a hard left candidate against him in two years. And that person is likely to win if the economy collapses. The average American will—incorrectly—see Trump as representing the free market. So they’ll vote for someone who’s anti free market. Someone who promises them lots of other people’s money. We might get a radical socialist. After all, we’ve seen Americans not only elect, but re-elect Obama. The American public is capable of almost anything. America has bifurcated into the red counties and the blue counties. And the people who live in red counties hate people from blue counties, and vice versa. The country is even more divided than it was in the late 1960s and early 1970s. A lot of people don’t remember this, but there were riots happening all the time back then. And not just a few, but many hundreds of terror bombings. Today, there’s less violence. But maybe that’s just because the average American is on some type of psychiatric drug, that pacifies him and dumbs him down. Still, the country has been bifurcated into two antagonistic groups. These people don’t just mildly disagree on issues. There’s also an excellent chance that the Republican party will bifurcate. There are already two separate parties within the Republican party—Trumpers and anti-Trumpers. They don’t like each other. The Democratic Party is splintering, too. There, you’ve got the old line, not-so-crazy democrats. And you’ve got the Looney Tunes Democrats—the ones that wanted to vote for Bernie, the Antifa types, and “Black Lives Matter” types. There are two parties within the Democratic Party, too. So, we’re up for a real political storm. It’s especially serious when you’ve got a guy like Trump in office who’s got a strong-man mentality. Trump—notwithstanding some of his good instincts—is capable of almost anything because he’s a statist and authoritarian at heart. He’s our version of Erdogan, Putin, or Xi. It’s starting to look like the ’30s, which was replete with strongman leaders—Roosevelt, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Franco… He’s trying to run the United States like a private company. So, it’s a dangerous situation… but it’s still better than if a Democrat was in office. Justin: Doug, you predicted that Trump would win the election long before most people even thought he had a chance. Now, I’m not asking you predict if Trump will win a second term or not. But how do you think Trump might position himself for reelection? Doug: He can’t do anything to make the anti-Trumpers like him. And he can apparently do no wrong with the people who like him. I just hope that he doesn’t stumble into a trade war. Or worse, a shooting war. Justin: Thanks for taking the time to speak with me today, Doug. Doug: You’re welcome. --------------------------------------------------------------- Justin’s note: As you know, Doug is among the most respected investors in the world. Since 1979, he’s called some of the biggest financial events of our time. And now, as part of our new special offer, you can get all of Doug’s future moneymaking research—as well as everything we publish here at Casey Research—as part of our exclusive Casey Platinum Membership. If you’ve wanted to see the many different products we offer, this is a way to save tens of thousands of dollars over the years. To learn more about this incredible opportunity, [click here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Reader Mailbag Today, another reader appreciates our recent Dispatch, “[How Trump Ends the Opioid Crisis]( That information about Portugal which you gave a thumbnail sketch is great. Deeper study will make a thinking person even more enthusiastic about the way they do things. Another example that the arrogant Americans could learn from is the way Chile manages its retirement program. Lots of forces in place against both these ideas. Knowledge is strength! Spread the word. —Tom As always, you can send any questions or suggestions for the Dispatch [right here](mailto:feedback@caseyresearch.com). [FACEBOOK]( [TWITTER]( [GOOGLE +]( [SUBSCRIBE]( © Casey Research, LLC 455 NE 5th Ave, Suite D317 Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.caseyresearch.com]( The email was sent to {EMAIL} because you are subscribed to this service. To unsubscribe, click [here](. Customer Service Casey Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact us, call Toll Free: (888) 512-2739, International: (602) 445-2736, Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–7 p.m. ET, or email us [here](mailto:subscribers@caseyresearch.com). Having trouble getting your emails? Add us to your address book. © 2018 Casey Research, 455 NE 5th Ave, Suite D317, Delray Beach, FL 33483, USA. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from the publisher. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not designed to meet your personal situation—we are not financial advisors nor do we give personalized advice. The opinions expressed herein are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. It may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Recommendations in Casey Research publications should be made only after consulting with your advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. You shouldn’t make any decision based solely on what you read here. Casey Research writers and publications do not take compensation in any form for covering those securities or commodities. Casey Research expressly forbids its writers from owning or having an interest in any security that they recommend to their readers. Furthermore, all other employees and agents of Casey Research and its affiliate companies must wait 24 hours before following an initial recommendation published on the Internet, or 72 hours after a printed publication is mailed.

EDM Keywords (350)

years year xi wrong written writers worthless worse work win willing whole well way watching wasted warfare war wanted vote visited video version values us update unrecognizable understanding undermined type trying truth trump true trouble trimming trillion today time threat thousands thinks think things tells taxes taped talking taking take sunday suggestions suggestion subscribed subject stumble stuff strictly store still steal statist starting start stans splintering spent spending speak sorts sort soon someone smaller sincere simply shows service serves sent send selling sell see security securities saying russians russia running run roots rise reviewing response respect resources republicans representing replete rent remember reliable regulations reduces redistribution recommend read reaching rampant raise radically questions question putin put pulling publisher publish publications psychology provoke provocative prospectus proof promises progressives presidency prepared predicted predict pragmatist possible portugal policy pocket pleased playbook place person people part pacifies owning overwhelming openers ones one office offer obtained obligation number note next never needs need nationalist narrative much mowing moved morons months money miss misallocated military militaristic might middle mexico men meme members meet media means mean maybe may matter make mailed made lots lot looking look live likely like libertarian leave learn lacks know kick justin jfk issues internet interesting interest instincts instance insane information influence hypocrite hope home history hillary helpful hedges heart head happen hands handling gulf guaranteed guarantee grew grass government got going goes get gave friendly friend form foremost forces foolish following follow florida first feedback far fact facebook extract evidence everything everybody even europe et establishing equivalent enthusiastic enslave enemy end encouraged employees emails email elected elect economy economics dumbs drastic drag doug done dollars divided disregarding discovered disbanding destructiveness designed deserve deregulating democrat deleverage defend debt dealt deal days dangerous danger cut culture crazy covering course country counterproductive could consulting congratulated compromise complimented company come collapse chinese china chance capable called businessman bureaucracy book billions bifurcated bifurcate best bernie believe become baltics background authoritarian asking ask artwork approve apparently anytime anything among always also almost allies agents afraid advisor addition adding actually accused accomplished accelerating 50 32x 30s 2018 2008 1950s

Marketing emails from caseyresearch.com

View More
Sent On

10/02/2019

Sent On

09/02/2019

Sent On

09/02/2019

Sent On

09/02/2019

Sent On

08/02/2019

Sent On

07/02/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.