Newsletter Subject

💰 Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Over-Betting On The River

From

cardplayer.com

Email Address

noreply@cardplayer.com

Sent On

Mon, Feb 27, 2023 10:59 PM

Email Preheader Text

Is this email not displaying correctly? . Feb 27, 2023 In a recent $3,500 buy-in main event, I found

Is this email not displaying correctly? [View it in your browser](. Feb 27, 2023 [Poker Strategy With Jonatha]( Little: Over-Betting On The River]( In a recent $3,500 buy-in main event, I found myself in a tricky spot on the river that I would like to share with you. My main opponent in this hand was a 50-year-old player who seemed to be somewhat loose and passive. He also seemed to overvalue most of his premium hands, which is a common trait most recreational players display. With a 25,000 effective stack, my opponent limped from middle position at 100-200 with a 200 big blind ante. I limped behind from the button with 9[Spade Suit] 5[Spade Suit]. The small blind completed, and the big blind checked their option. With 9[Spade Suit] 5[Spade Suit], I am fine with all three options, limping, raising, and folding. I prefer limping because my hand is fairly weak, but still has a little bit of post-flop potential. More importantly though, I know that if I happen to flop a strong hand, my main opponent in the hand will likely call me down with all sorts of marginal hands. If I thought my opponent would play in a weak, passive manner after the flop where he will fold to a continuation bet most of the time, I would have raised. If I thought he would play well, I would have folded. The flop came Q[Spade Suit] 7[Spade Suit] 6[Club Suit], giving me a flush draw and a gutshot straight draw. That is lucky! The blinds checked to the middle position player who bet 600 into the 1,000 pot. Both calling and raising are acceptable options but I prefer raising. The stacks are fairly deep and I want to build a pot so that when I complete my draw, I can make a sizable bet and ideally get paid off for a lot of chips. I raised to 1,600. The blinds folded and my opponent thought for a few seconds before calling. The turn was the 10[Heart Suit], a complete blank for me. My opponent quickly bet 600 into the 4,200 pot. This small lead is a bet that most amateur players will make with a hand that is fairly strong, but non-premium. I assumed he had something like K-Q, 7-6, or perhaps even a set. I was unsure if he would fold if I raised, but I was fairly certain that if I raised on the turn and then bet large on the river that he would fold most of his one-pair hands, (making a river bluff extremely profitable). I also thought that if I raised the turn and bet small on the river that he would call (allowing me to get value from my nut hands). I raised to 3,000, as I would also do with my premium made hands, such as 9-8 and 7-7. My opponent quickly called. The river was the 3[Diamond Suit], another complete blank, and my opponent checked. When you find yourself on the river with the bottom of your range, which will often be the case when you have a busted draw, it is usually a good idea to bluff, especially if you have lots of value hands in your range. While most people would bet “large,” perhaps 8,000 into the 10,200 pot, hoping to make their opponent fold, I did not think this specific opponent would fold top pair or better to a “typical” large bet. In order to steal this pot, I needed to make a bet that my opponent could simply not justify calling. So, I went all-in for 20,175, betting two times the size of the pot. My opponent thought for around three minutes, counting out the chips as if he was about to call. I remained stoic throughout the process. He eventually folded 10[Diamond Suit] 7[Diamond Suit], two pair, face up, giving me the pot. What a relief, poker is fun! ♠ If you want to increase your poker skills and learn to crush the games, check out Jonathan Little’s elite training site at [PokerCoaching.com/CardPlayer](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2023 Card Player Media, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Card Player Media 6940 O'Bannon DriveLas Vegas, NV 89117 [Add us to your address book]( [unsubscribe from this list]( | [update subscription preferences]( | [view email in browser](

Marketing emails from cardplayer.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Sent On

26/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.