Newsletter Subject

đź’° Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Preflop Mistakes Lead To Post-Flop Blunders

From

cardplayer.com

Email Address

noreply@cardplayer.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 30, 2024 01:01 AM

Email Preheader Text

Is this email not displaying correctly? . Aug 29, 2024 I was recently reviewing the hands of one of

Is this email not displaying correctly? [View it in your browser](. Aug 29, 2024 [Poker Strategy With Jonatha]( Little: Preflop Mistakes Lead To Post-Flop Blunders]( I was recently reviewing the hands of one of my new students who plays low-stakes no-limit cash games in live casinos when this interesting spot came up. At $1-$3, everyone folded to the hijack, a decent loose, aggressive player who raised to $18 out of his $215 effective stack. The button folded and my student called from the small blind with A[Heart Suit] 7[Heart Suit]. While this call may seem standard to most players, it is actually a mistake. Especially from out of position, you have to be careful calling large raises with any hand due to your poor position. When you flop a premium hand, you will have a difficult time extracting value, and when you flop a marginal hand, your opponent gets to decide how much money goes into the pot. My student should have either folded or three-bet, taking control of the pot. To illustrate this point, imagine the flop comes K-8-4. If you three-bet before the flop with A[Heart Suit] 7[Heart Suit] and continuation bet this flop, your opponent will usually fold unless he improves to at least a pair, which will only happen about 35% of the time. By playing aggressively, you will win many pots where you have the worst hand. Compare this to what happens when you just call your opponent’s preflop raise. You will check the K-7-4 flop, your opponent will bet, and then you will fold. This will result in your opponent stealing pots from you. I understand that playing aggressively may be uncomfortable at first, but you simply must learn to apply aggression if you want to succeed at poker, especially from out of position. (Be sure to check out the courses on bluffing at my training site PokerCoaching.com/CardPlayer.) This time, the flop came A[Spade Suit] K[Diamond Suit] 10[Heart Suit], giving my student top pair with a weak kicker. My student checked, the hijack bet $30 into the $39 pot, and my student called. This is the exact type of flop that my student does not want to see. He often has the best hand, but if lots of money goes into the pot, he is usually crushed. While I am fine with the flop check-call, this situation will often become quite dicey by the river. The turn was the 8[Spade Suit]. My student checked, the hijack bet $40 into the $99 pot, and my student called. At this point, making a tight fold is the correct play. Notice there are very few value hands that a competent player would bet in the hijack’s spot that my student beats. The best my student can hope for is that the hijack is betting with a slightly worse made hand like A-5 or K-Q, or perhaps that he is completely bluffing with a hand like J-9. Instead of only focusing on the hands you beat, you must also consider the hands that would bet in this manner that you lose to. Here, there are many hands that A-7 loses to. The river was the 5[Club Suit]. My student checked, the hijack bet $50 into the $179 pot, and my student called. Despite the excellent pot odds, my student should have again folded. The only hands that he beats at this point are vastly overvalued marginal made hands (which many competent players would not bet) and total bluffs. I also do not think many players would make this river bet size as a bluff, although perhaps some will. This time, the hijack turned up A-Q, awarding him a nice pot. In most small and medium stakes games, when someone bets on the flop, turn, and river, you should assume they have a reasonable value hand unless you have an excellent reason to believe otherwise. If you want to improve your preflop game even more, I put together a Five-Day Preflop Challenge with the help of Jonathan Jaffe and Matt Affleck. This challenge is completely free inside Card Player Poker School! When you join the [Card Player Poker School]( (it’s free to join), you’ll also get: - Free Downloadable Preflop Charts - GTO Preflop Charts - Video Classes - Interactive Hand Quizzes - Free Course: Master The Fundamentals - Free Course: The 25 Biggest Leaks And How To Fix Them - Free Training Every Week Jonathan Little is a two-time WPT winner and the 2024 PokerGO Cup champion with nearly $9 million million in live tournament earnings, best-selling author of 15 educational poker books, and 2019 GPI Poker Personality of the Year. If you want to increase your poker skills and learn to crush the games, check out his training site at [PokerCoaching.com/cardplayer](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2024 Card Player Media, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Card Player Media 6940 O'Bannon DriveLas Vegas, NV 89117 [Add us to your address book]( [unsubscribe from this list]( | [update subscription preferences]( | [view email in browser](

Marketing emails from cardplayer.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Sent On

26/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.