Newsletter Subject

💰 Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Being A Bully At The Table

From

cardplayer.com

Email Address

noreply@cardplayer.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 2, 2024 06:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Is this email not displaying correctly? . Apr 02, 2024 I was recently told about an interesting situ

Is this email not displaying correctly? [View it in your browser](. Apr 02, 2024 [Poker Strategy With Jonatha]( Little: Being A Bully At The Table]( I was recently told about an interesting situation from a $2-$4 live no-limit cash game that demonstrates how to take advantage of weak, straightforward players who telegraph their hand’s strength with their bet sizes. With $600 effective stacks, a player from middle position limped, as did the cutoff. Our Hero raised to $24 from the button with J[Spade Suit] 10[Spade Suit]. While I am fine with raising this decently-strong hand that has good post-flop playability from the button, both calling and raising larger to $32 are also reasonable options. Calling keeps the pot small, amplifying your post-flop advantage (assuming you play well) and raising larger allows you to pick up the preflop pot with no contest more often. When you make it between $16 and $24, you will find that you almost never win the pot preflop, meaning you will often have to flop well to have a good chance to win the pot. Only the cutoff called Hero’s $24 raise. The flop came A[Spade Suit] Q[Diamond Suit] 8[Spade Suit], giving Hero a flush draw and double-gutshot straight draw. The cutoff led for $20 into the $54 pot. Most of the time when someone leads on a flop that should be excellent for the preflop raiser’s range, they usually have some sort of marginal made hand or a junky draw. Given Hero’s J[Spade Suit] 10[Spade Suit] makes it less likely that the opponent has a draw, he likely has a weak ace that is betting to try to “find out where it stands. " If you think the opponent will fold an ace to a flop raise, then raising large, perhaps to $100, has a lot of merit. If you think your opponent will never fold top pair, calling with the strong draw makes more sense. That said, when you have a premium draw, taking the aggressive route is rarely wrong because even when your opponent calls, you will still win the pot roughly 50% of the time. Hero called. The turn was the 10[Club Suit]. Both players checked. When checked to on the turn, Hero should assume his middle pair is rarely the best hand, although it will be from time to time when he is against a junky flush draw like 7[Spade Suit] 6[Spade Suit]. The real question is whether or not the opponent will fold an ace to a turn plus river bet. In my experience, they will make a big fold if you bet large enough. However, if you think your opponent plans to call down once he checks the turn, semi-bluffing makes no sense. The river was the Q[Diamond Suit]. The opponent bet $30 into the $94 pot. At this point, it is highly unlikely that Hero has the best hand. The opponent will have an ace or queen almost every time. In his post-hand analysis to me, Hero mentioned that he has seen his opponent bet small on the river twice with marginal value hands and large on the river once with the nuts. This made Hero think the opponent was much more likely to have an ace than a queen (or a better made hand). Hero bluff-raised to $120. I like raising the river more than I like calling. When you lose to all the marginal made hands in your opponent’s range and you think most of your opponent’s range is marginal made hands, calling makes no sense. Hero’s only options are to raise or fold. Hero must now assess whether or not the opponent will fold an ace to a raise. Some players will always call while others will always fold. If you are confident your specific opponent will rarely call with an ace, raising makes a lot of sense. I like Hero’s $120 raise size. It is a substantial amount that will often result in the opponent folding. The opponent grumbled for a minute about how lucky Hero was to catch his queen on the river before folding A-2 face-up. Nice hand! ♠ If you want more resources to help you improve your game, I put together a course called The 25 Biggest Leaks and How to Fix Them. This course is completely free inside Card Player Poker School! When you join the [Card Player Poker School]( (it’s free to join), you’ll also get: ✔ Free downloadable preflop charts ✔ GTO preflop charts ✔ Video Classes ✔ Interactive Hand Quizzes ✔ Free Course: Master the Fundamentals ✔ Free Course: The 25 Biggest Leaks and How to Fix Them ✔ Free training every week If you want to increase your poker skills and learn to crush the games, check out Jonathan Little’s elite training site at [PokerCoaching.com/CardPlayer](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2024 Card Player Media, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Card Player Media 6940 O'Bannon DriveLas Vegas, NV 89117 [Add us to your address book]( [unsubscribe from this list]( | [update subscription preferences]( | [view email in browser](

Marketing emails from cardplayer.com

View More
Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Sent On

06/05/2024

Sent On

05/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

30/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.