Newsletter Subject

💰 Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Final Table Short Stacked Mistake

From

cardplayer.com

Email Address

noreply@cardplayer.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 21, 2024 10:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Is this email not displaying correctly? . Mar 21, 2024 I was recently told about a hand from the fin

Is this email not displaying correctly? [View it in your browser](. Mar 21, 2024 [Poker Strategy With Jonatha]( Little: Final Table Short Stacked Mistake]( I was recently told about a hand from the final table of a live $1,000 buy-in tournament that illustrates a few critical mistakes that some players make when playing short stacked. With blinds at 10,000-20,000 with a 20,000 big blind ante, the action folded to the small blind who started with 240,000. He was the shortest stack at the final table, but there were a few other players with between 15 and 20 big blinds. The blind was a loose, aggressive player with 50 big blinds. The small blind looked down at J[Heart Suit] 3[Diamond Suit] and decided to complete. Limping in this situation is not a good play. J-3 is a junky hand and despite the excellent pot odds (10,000 to win 60,000), it is not strong enough to play. From out of position with a 12 big blind stack, you can be somewhat confident the big blind will apply aggression a decent amount of the time, forcing J-3 to fold. Even if you get to see a cheap flop, you will usually flop nothing or a weak made hand that will have a difficult time confidently playing for all the money. There is also a lot of merit in simply conserving a 12 big blind stack, opting to wait for a better spot to invest your chips. The big blind checked with 10[Heart Suit] 2[Club Suit]. I am fine with this check, but if you think the small blind will raise with most of his strong hands, his limping range may be susceptible to being pushed around. I would strongly consider making it 56,000 with 10-2 offsuit with the intention of folding if the small blind goes all-in. The flop came K[Heart Suit] 6[Heart Suit] 2[Spade Suit]. The small blind bet 40,000 out of his 220,000 remaining stack. Again, I dislike this play. Especially in limped pots on K-x-x flops, you will find the big blind either has a pair or flush draw that is never folding, or queen-high or a worse unpaired hand, which will almost always fold to any bet. Notice that most ace-high hands would raise or go all-in preflop, so those shouldn’t be in the big blind’s range too often. So, if you decide to bet the flop with J-3 as a low equity bluff, you should make a small bet, 20,000 into the 60,000 pot. If you think your opponent will call a 20,000 bet every time, perhaps add on a bit more, making it 26,000. The big blind pushed all-in with bottom pair, forcing J-3 to fold. I am fine with the all-in with bottom pair. There are plenty of hands you want to protect against (for example, J[Heart Suit] 3[Diamond Suit] has 30% equity) and when you happen to be beat, you have five outs to improve. This may feel like a risky all-in, but bottom pair (especially when it is a low bottom pair, such as twos) will have a difficult time continuing on the turn and river, making an all-in for the short stack’s stack ideal. This may seem like an innocuous hand, but the small blind lost 50,000 more than he should have. He should have simply folded preflop. Even if he limped and then bet 26,000 on the flop, he would have lost 14,000 less than he did. It is vitally important that you study and master short-stacked poker if you want to have any chance to succeed in tournaments. Sometimes you simply have to make a disciplined fold and move to the next hand. If you want more resources to help you improve your game, I put together a course called The 25 Biggest Leaks and How to Fix Them. This course is completely free inside Card Player Poker School! When you join the [Card Player Poker School]( (it’s free to join), you’ll also get: ✔ Free downloadable preflop charts ✔ GTO preflop charts ✔ Video Classes ✔ Interactive Hand Quizzes ✔ Free Course: Master the Fundamentals ✔ Free Course: The 25 Biggest Leaks and How to Fix Them ✔ Free training every week If you want to increase your poker skills and learn to crush the games, check out Jonathan Little’s elite training site at [PokerCoaching.com/CardPlayer](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2024 Card Player Media, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Card Player Media 6940 O'Bannon DriveLas Vegas, NV 89117 [Add us to your address book]( [unsubscribe from this list]( | [update subscription preferences]( | [view email in browser](

Marketing emails from cardplayer.com

View More
Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Sent On

06/05/2024

Sent On

05/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

30/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.