Newsletter Subject

Do 3rd-Party Social Media Tools Negatively Affect Reach and Engagement?

From

buffer.com

Email Address

hello@buffer.com

Sent On

Mon, Jan 15, 2018 02:52 PM

Email Preheader Text

Trouble viewing? Last week people using Buffer posted 4,796,194 updates to their social networks. It

[Buffer Weekly Digest]( Trouble viewing? [View this email online]( Last week people using Buffer posted 4,796,194 updates to their social networks. It looks like you haven't connected an account to your Buffer yet - [connect an account now](   Our 200+ Post Experiment and Results Hi there, Putting your trust as a marketer or brand in 3rd-party social media tools to manage all of your posts can be a bit scary. You might be wondering: Are my posts getting optimal reach and engagement? Do social media platforms penalize 3rd-party tools? Are 3rd-party tools really worth the cost? These are some of the most common questions our Customer Advocates receive on a daily basis. And up until this research, we haven’t had any concrete data to say “yes” or “no” to whether or not 3rd-party tools affect the reach and engagement of posts. For an entire month, with the help of several awesome marketers and brands, we tested more than 200 posts across 35 profiles to see exactly how 3rd-party social media tools stack up vs. native posting. Today we’re excited to share the experiment setup and results in their entirety. [Read the post](   Latest from our Social blog: [10 Top Tips for Smarter Social Media Marketing with the Buffer Mobile App]( [Unsubscribe]( Buffer. 44 Tehama Street San Francisco, CA 94105 [Buffer Weekly Digest](

Marketing emails from buffer.com

View More
Sent On

04/01/2023

Sent On

24/09/2020

Sent On

23/01/2020

Sent On

18/12/2019

Sent On

26/02/2018

Sent On

19/02/2018

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.