Newsletter Subject

The Decline of Apple in the Age of AI

From

brownstoneresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@e.brownstoneresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Mar 29, 2024 08:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Colin?s Note: At the beginning of this year, I published some bold predictions for 2024? Includi

[The Bleeding Edge]( Colin’s Note: At the beginning of this year, I published some bold predictions for 2024… Including the fall of Apple from its place as the world’s most valuable company. Back then, I warned that flagging sales and an inability to outpace its competitors in the age of artificial intelligence spelled trouble for the tech giant. The landscape of AI is changing. Over the past year and change, we’ve seen every company that even hinted that it might integrate AI into its operations get a boost thanks to the frenzy surrounding AI thanks to the success of industry heavy-hitters like Nvidia and Microsoft… But that isn’t the case anymore. It’s like I’ve been telling you, in the world of artificial intelligence… innovation is now the name of the game. And while that might’ve been what Apple was known for in 2007, it might be bad news for the Apple of today. Simply click below to access today’s video. Or, if you prefer to read, as usual, my team and I have provided a transcript, edited for flow. --------------------------------------------------------------- “Apple is beginning to look and feel like a tired giant rather than the innovator we've known for the past 30 years.” That was from [our January 3 issue]( of The Bleeding Edge. At the time, Apple was still the most valuable company in the world. But things have gotten worse since then for the iPhone maker. Shares have fallen more than 10% this year alone. And the company could soon be worth less than Microsoft, Nvidia, Google, and Amazon. It's beginning to feel like Apple has permanently lost its ability to innovate in a tech landscape that is constantly changing thanks to artificial intelligence (AI). What happened to Apple? And can the company regain its throne as the world's most valuable company? Or will Apple end up like Blackberry as a once-dominant handset maker… only to be passed by? Let's examine today on The Bleeding Edge. Since the iPhone launched in 2007, Apple shares have been steadily climbing, rewarding shareholders every step of the way. But over the past several years, each new iPhone release has been met with memes and jokes online about how it’s almost exactly the same as the year before. And the public is beginning to notice. Global shipments of smartphones have been steadily declining for many years. This has caused Apple's sales to stagnate. As iPhone sales have fallen, Apple has aggressively moved into subscription and service revenue. This has brought in some high-margin sales and revenue, but it's coming at a price… One that can dismantle Apple permanently. The company has relied on taxing every single dollar that flows through its ecosystem. From dating apps to video games, Apple collects as much as a 30% fee from these developers. And that has caused many application makers to strike back. Netflix, for example, doesn't allow you to pay through its app to avoid paying this fee to Apple. Epic Games – the company behind the popular video game Fortnite – successfully took Apple to court. It is looking to permanently change the way Apple can collect these fees from app makers. I expect a positive impact for dating companies like Match Group and Bumble. Both could see meaningful increases in their revenue with Apple's fees potentially being slashed. With stalling iPhone tablet and computer sales, a loss of high-margin service revenue could bring shares of Apple down even further. Potentially more alarming to Apple than the loss of this App Store taxation is the fact that AI is going to change how we interact with our devices forever. Just like how Apple changed the game in 2007 with the iPhone, AI is set to do the same with communication devices going forward. We're already seeing early devices gain traction. The Rabbit R1 has pre-sold about 100,000 units and they are set to ship later this month. The device relies exclusively on AI to handle tasks such as hailing an Uber or listening to music. Other similar devices will come to market as well, and one in particular could be a game changer. For months there have been rumors that a former Apple superstar designer responsible for virtually every Apple product over the past two decades has been working with OpenAI on a communications device… That's right, Johnny Ives' design firm in San Francisco is rumored to be working with OpenAI on a device that could operate similarly to the Rabbit R1. One would think Apple could respond with its own AI device. It remains to be seen if it can. But last week, we received some disturbing rumors that Apple is considering partnering with Google or OpenAI to power some of its AI features in a forthcoming iPhone. That would be the nail in Apple's ecosystem – which is already under fire from app makers and regulators – both here in the United States and in Europe. Much like when the Blackberry had to turn to Android to power its handset, if Apple can’t develop its own proprietary AI software, the potential for a new device to arrive and take market share from Apple remains very high. In the changing landscape of this technology, it's important to remember that innovation is always paramount. Taxing application makers and small tweaks to the iPhone isn't going to get the job done for Apple. And I expect shares to continue to underperform the broader tech sector. That was The Bleeding Edge for today. I hope you all have a wonderful weekend and I'll see you again next week. --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@brownstoneresearch.com. [Brownstone Research]( Brownstone Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.brownstoneresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Brownstone Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-512-0726, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@brownstoneresearch.com). © 2024 Brownstone Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Brownstone Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from brownstoneresearch.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

27/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.