NOTE: This newsletter might be cut short by your email program. [View it in full](.  If a friend forwarded it to you and you'd like your very own newsletter, [subscribe here]( â it's free.  Need to modify your subscription? You can [change your email address]( or [unsubscribe](. [The Marginalian]( [Welcome] Hello {NAME}! This is the midweek edition of [The Marginalian]( by Maria Popova â one piece resurfaced from the sixteen-year archive as timeless uplift for heart, mind, and spirit. If you missed last week's archival resurrection â music and the body: Richard Poweres on the power of song â you can catch up [right here](. And if you missed them, here are my [17 life-learnings from 17 years of The Marginalian](. If my labor of love enriches your life in any way, please consider supporting it with a [donation]( â it remains free and ad-free and alive thanks to reader patronage. If you already donate: I appreciate you more than you know. [FROM THE ARCHIVE | The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone]( âYou are born alone. You die alone. The value of the space in between is trust and love,â artist Louise Bourgeois wrote in her diary at the end of a long and illustrious life as she contemplated [how solitude enriches creative work](. Itâs a lovely sentiment, but as empowering as it may be to those willing to embrace solitude, it can be tremendously lonesome-making to those for whom loneliness has contracted the space of trust and love into a suffocating penitentiary. For if in solitude, as Wendell Berry [memorably wrote]( âoneâs inner voices become audible [and] one responds more clearly to other lives,â in loneliness oneâs inner scream becomes deafening, deadening, severing any thread of connection to other lives. How to break free of that prison and reinhabit the space of trust and love is what Olivia Laing explores in [The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone]( ([public library]( â an extraordinary more-than-memoir; a sort of memoir-plus-plus, partway between Helen MacDonaldâs [H Is for Hawk]( and the diary of Virginia Woolf; a lyrical account of wading through a period of self-expatriation, both physical and psychological, in which Laing paints an intimate portrait of loneliness as âa populated place: a city in itself.â Art by Isol from [Daytime Visions]( After the sudden collapse of a romance marked by extreme elation, Laing left her native England and took her shattered heart to New York, âthat teeming island of gneiss and concrete and glass.â The daily, bone-deep loneliness she experienced there was both paralyzing in its all-consuming potency and, paradoxically, a strange invitation to aliveness. Indeed, her choice to leave home and wander a foreign city is itself a rich metaphor for the paradoxical nature of loneliness, animated by equal parts restlessness and stupor, capable of turning one into a voluntary vagabond and a catatonic recluse all at once, yet somehow a vitalizing laboratory for self-discovery. The pit of loneliness, she found, could âdrive one to consider some of the larger questions of what it is to be alive.â She writes: There were things that burned away at me, not only as a private individual, but also as a citizen of our century, our pixelated age. What does it mean to be lonely? How do we live, if weâre not intimately engaged with another human being? How do we connect with other people, particularly if we donât find speaking easy? Is sex a cure for loneliness, and if it is, what happens if our body or sexuality is considered deviant or damaged, if we are ill or unblessed with beauty? And is technology helping with these things? Does it draw us closer together, or trap us behind screens? Bedeviled by this acute emotional anguish, Laing seeks consolation in the great patron saints of loneliness in twentieth-century creative culture. From this eclectic tribe of the lonesome â including Jean-Michel Basquiat, Alfred Hitchcock, Peter Hujar, Billie Holiday, and Nan Goldin â Laing chooses four artists as her companions charting the terra incognita of loneliness: Edward Hopper, Andy Warhol, Henry Darger, and David Wojnarowicz, who had all âgrappled in their lives as well as work with loneliness and its attendant issues.â Photograph by Maria Popova. (Available [as a print]( She considers, for instance, Warhol â an artist whom Laing had always dismissed until she was submerged in loneliness herself. (âIâd seen the screen-printed cows and Chairman Maos a thousand times, and I thought they were vacuous and empty, disregarding them as we often do with things weâve looked at but failed properly to see.â) She writes: Warholâs art patrols the space between people, conducting a grand philosophical investigation into closeness and distance, intimacy and estrangement. Like many lonely people, he was an inveterate hoarder, making and surrounding himself with objects, barriers against the demands of human intimacy. Terrified of physical contact, he rarely left the house without an armoury of cameras and tape recorders, using them to broker and buffer interactions: behaviour that has light to shed on how we deploy technology in our own century of so-called connectivity. Woven into the fabric of Laingâs personal experience are inquiries into the nature, context, and background of these four artistsâ lives and their works most preoccupied with loneliness. But just as it would be unfair to call Laingâs masterpiece only a âmemoir,â it would be unfair to call these threads âart history,â for they are rather the opposite, a kind of âart presentâ â elegant and erudite meditations on how art is present with us, how it invites us to be present with ourselves and bears witness to that presence, alleviating our loneliness in the process. Laing examines the particular, pervasive form of loneliness in the eye of a city aswirl with humanity: Imagine standing by a window at night, on the sixth or seventeenth or forty-third floor of a building. The city reveals itself as a set of cells, a hundred thousand windows, some darkened and some flooded with green or white or golden light. Inside, strangers swim to and fro, attending to the business of their private hours. You can see them, but you canât reach them, and so this commonplace urban phenomenon, available in any city of the world on any night, conveys to even the most social a tremor of loneliness, its uneasy combination of separation and exposure. You can be lonely anywhere, but there is a particular flavour to the loneliness that comes from living in a city, surrounded by millions of people. One might think this state was antithetical to urban living, to the massed presence of other human beings, and yet mere physical proximity is not enough to dispel a sense of internal isolation. Itâs possible â easy, even â to feel desolate and unfrequented in oneself while living cheek by jowl with others. Cities can be lonely places, and in admitting this we see that loneliness doesnât necessarily require physical solitude, but rather an absence or paucity of connection, closeness, kinship: an inability, for one reason or another, to find as much intimacy as is desired. Unhappy, as the dictionary has it, as a result of being without the companionship of others. Hardly any wonder, then, that it can reach its apotheosis in a crowd. As scientists are continuing to unpeel [the physiological effects of loneliness]( it is no surprise that this psychological state comes with an almost bodily dimension, which Laing captures vividly: What does it feel like to be lonely? It feels like being hungry: like being hungry when everyone around you is readying for a feast. It feels shameful and alarming, and over time these feelings radiate outwards, making the lonely person increasingly isolated, increasingly estranged. It hurts, in the way that feelings do, and it also has physical consequences that take place invisibly, inside the closed compartments of the body. It advances, is what Iâm trying to say, cold as ice and clear as glass, enclosing and engulfing. There is, of course, a universe of difference between solitude and loneliness â two radically different interior orientations toward the same exterior circumstance of lacking companionship. We speak of [âfertile solitudeâ as a developmental achievement essential for our creative capacity]( but loneliness is barren and destructive; it cottons in apathy the will to create. More than that, it seems to signal an existential failing â a social stigma the nuances of which Laing addresses beautifully: Loneliness is difficult to confess; difficult too to categorise. Like depression, a state with which it often intersects, it can run deep in the fabric of a person, as much a part of oneâs being as laughing easily or having red hair. Then again, it can be transient, lapping in and out in reaction to external circumstance, like the loneliness that follows on the heels of a bereavement, break-up or change in social circles. Like depression, like melancholy or restlessness, it is subject too to pathologisation, to being considered a disease. It has been said emphatically that loneliness serves no purpose⦠Perhaps Iâm wrong, but I donât think any experience so much a part of our common shared lives can be entirely devoid of meaning, without a richness and a value of some kind. With an eye to Virginia Woolfâs unforgettable [diary writings on loneliness and creativity]( Laing speculates: Loneliness might be taking you towards an otherwise unreachable experience of reality. Adrift and alone in the city that promises its inhabitants [âthe gift of privacy with the excitement of participation,â]( Laing cycles through a zoetrope of temporary homes â sublets, friendsâ apartments, and various borrowed quarters, only amplifying the sense of otherness and alienation as she is forced to make âa life among someone elseâs things, in a home that someone else has created and long since.â Art by Carson Ellis from [Home]( But therein lies an inescapable metaphor for life itself â we are, after all, subletting our very existence from a city and a society and a world that have been there for much longer than we have, already arranged in a way that might not be to our taste, that might not be how the building would be laid out and its interior designed were we to do it from scratch ourselves. And yet we are left to make ourselves at home in the way things are, imperfect and sometimes downright ugly. The measure of a life has to do with this subletting ability â with how well we are able to settle into this borrowed, imperfect abode and how much beauty we can bring into existence with however little control over its design we may have. This, perhaps, is why Laing found her only, if temporary, respite from loneliness in an activity propelled by the very act of leaving this borrowed home: walking. In a passage that calls to mind Robert Walserâs [exquisite serenade to the soul-nourishment of the walk]( she writes: In certain circumstances, being outside, not fitting in, can be a source of satisfaction, even pleasure. There are kinds of solitude that provide a respite from loneliness, a holiday if not a cure. Sometimes as I walked, roaming under the stanchions of the Williamsburg Bridge or following the East River all the way to the silvery hulk of the U.N., I could forget my sorry self, becoming instead as porous and borderless as the mist, pleasurably adrift on the currents of the city. But whatever semblance of a more solid inner center these peripatetic escapes into solitude offered, it was a brittle solidity: I didnât get this feeling when I was in my apartment; only when I was outside, either entirely alone or submerged in a crowd. In these situations I felt liberated from the persistent weight of loneliness, the sensation of wrongness, the agitation around stigma and judgement and visibility. But it didnât take much to shatter the illusion of self-forgetfulness, to bring me back not only to myself but to the familiar, excruciating sense of lack. Edward Hopper: Nighthawks (1942) It was in the lacuna between self-forgetfulness and self-discovery that Laing found herself drawn to the artists who became her companions in a journey both toward and away from loneliness. There is Edward Hopper with his iconic Nighthawks aglow in eerie jade, of which Laing writes: There is no colour in existence that so powerfully communicates urban alienation, the atomisation of human beings inside the edifices they create, as this noxious pallid green, which only came into being with the advent of electricity, and which is inextricably associated with the nocturnal city, the city of glass towers, of empty illuminated offices and neon signs. [â¦] The diner was a place of refuge, absolutely, but there was no visible entrance, no way to get in or out. There was a cartoonish, ochre-coloured door at the back of the painting, leading perhaps into a grimy kitchen. But from the street, the room was sealed: an urban aquarium, a glass cell. [â¦] Green on green, glass on glass, a mood that expanded the longer I lingered, breeding disquiet. Hopper himself had a conflicted relationship with the common interpretation that loneliness was a central theme of his work. Although he often denied that it was a deliberate creative choice, he once conceded in an interview: âI probably am a lonely one.â Laing, whose attention and sensitivity to even the subtlest texture of experience are what make the book so wonderful, considers how Hopperâs choice of language captures the essence of loneliness: Itâs an unusual formulation, a lonely one; not at all the same thing as admitting one is lonely. Instead, it suggests with that a, that unassuming indefinite article, a fact that loneliness by its nature resists. Though it feels entirely isolating, a private burden no one else could possibly experience or share, it is in reality a communal state, inhabited by many people. In fact, current studies suggest that more than a quarter of American adults suffers from loneliness, independent of race, education and ethnicity, while 45 per cent of British adults report feeling lonely either often or sometimes. Marriage and high income serve as mild deterrents, but the truth is that few of us are absolutely immune to feeling a greater longing for connection than we find ourselves able to satisfy. The lonely ones, a hundred million strong. Hardly any wonder Hopperâs paintings remain so popular, and so endlessly reproduced. Reading his halting confession, one begins to see why his work is not just compelling but also consoling, especially when viewed en masse. Itâs true that he painted, not once but many times, the loneliness of a large city, where the possibilities of connection are repeatedly defeated by the dehumanising apparatus of urban life. But didnât he also paint loneliness as a large city, revealing it as a shared, democratic place, inhabited, whether willingly or not, by many souls? [â¦] What Hopper captures is beautiful as well as frightening. They arenât sentimental, his pictures, but there is an extraordinary attentiveness to them⦠As if loneliness was something worth looking at. More than that, as if looking itself was an antidote, a way to defeat lonelinessâs strange, estranging spell. David Wojnarowicz by Peter Hujar (Peter Hujar Archive) For the artists accompanying Laing on her journey â including Henry Darger, the brilliant and mentally ill Chicago janitor whose posthumously discovered paintings made him one of the most celebrated outsider artists of the twentieth century, and the creative polymath David Wojnarowicz, still in his thirties when AIDS took his life â loneliness was often twined with another profound affliction of the psyche: loss. In a passage evocative of Paul Goodmanâs [taxonomy of the nine types of silence]( Laing offers a taxonomy of lonelinesses through the lens of loss: Loss is a cousin of loneliness. They intersect and overlap, and so itâs not surprising that a work of mourning might invoke a feeling of aloneness, of separation. Mortality is lonely. Physical existence is lonely by its nature, stuck in a body thatâs moving inexorably towards decay, shrinking, wastage and fracture. Then thereâs the loneliness of bereavement, the loneliness of lost or damaged love, of missing one or many specific people, the loneliness of mourning. But this lonesomeness of mortality finds its antidote in the abiding consolations of immortal works of art. âArt holds out the promise of inner wholeness,â philosopher Alain de Botton and art historian John Armstrong wrote in their inquiry into [the seven psychological functions of art]( and if loneliness is, as Laing puts it, âa longing for integration, for a sense of feeling whole,â what better answer to that longing than art? After all, in [the immortal words of James {NAME}]( âonly an artist can tell, and only artists have told since we have heard of man, what it is like for anyone who gets to this planet to survive it.â Looking back on her experience, Laing writes: There are so many things that art canât do. It canât bring the dead back to life, it canât mend arguments between friends, or cure AIDS, or halt the pace of climate change. All the same, it does have some extraordinary functions, some odd negotiating ability between people, including people who never meet and yet who infiltrate and enrich each otherâs lives. It does have a capacity to create intimacy; it does have a way of healing wounds, and better yet of making it apparent that not all wounds need healing and not all scars are ugly. If I sound adamant it is because I am speaking from personal experience. When I came to New York I was in pieces, and though it sounds perverse, the way I recovered a sense of wholeness was not by meeting someone or by falling in love, but rather by handling the things that other people had made, slowly absorbing by way of this contact the fact that loneliness, longing, does not mean one has failed, but simply that one is alive. But as profoundly personal as loneliness may feel, it is inseparable from the political dimensions of public life. In a closing passage that calls to mind Audre Lordeâs clarion call for [breaking our silences against structural injustice]( Laing adds: There is a gentrification that is happening to cities, and there is a gentrification that is happening to the emotions too, with a similarly homogenising, whitening, deadening effect. Amidst the glossiness of late capitalism, we are fed the notion that all difficult feelings â depression, anxiety, loneliness, rage â are simply a consequence of unsettled chemistry, a problem to be fixed, rather than a response to structural injustice or, on the other hand, to the native texture of embodiment, of doing time, as David Wojnarowicz memorably put it, in a rented body, with all the attendant grief and frustration that entails. I donât believe the cure for loneliness is meeting someone, not necessarily. I think itâs about two things: learning how to befriend yourself and understanding that many of the things that seem to afflict us as individuals are in fact a result of larger forces of stigma and exclusion, which can and should be resisted. Loneliness is personal, and it is also political. Loneliness is collective; it is a city. As to how to inhabit it, there are no rules and nor is there any need to feel shame, only to remember that the pursuit of individual happiness does not trump or excuse our obligations to each another. We are in this together, this accumulation of scars, this world of objects, this physical and temporary heaven that so often takes on the countenance of hell. What matters is kindness; what matters is solidarity. What matters is staying alert, staying open, because if we know anything from what has gone before us, it is that the time for feeling will not last. [The Lonely City]( is a layered and endlessly rewarding book, among the finest I have ever read. Complement it with Rebecca Solnit on [how we find ourselves by getting lost]( David Whyte on [the transfiguration of aloneness]( Alfred Kazin on [loneliness and the immigrant experience]( and Sara Maitland on [how to be alone without being lonely](. Thanks, [Emily]( [Forward to a friend]( Online]( [Like on Facebook]( donating=loving
Each month, I spend hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars keeping The Marginalian going. For seventeen years, it has remained free and ad-free and alive thanks to patronage from readers. I have no staff, no interns, not even an assistant â a thoroughly one-woman labor of love that is also my life and my livelihood. If this labor makes your own life more livable in any way, please consider aiding its sustenance with a one-time or loyal donation. Your support makes all the difference. monthly donation
You can become a Sustaining Patron with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a Brooklyn lunch. Â
one-time donation
Or you can become a Spontaneous Supporter with a one-time donation in any amount.
[Start Now]( [Give Now]( Partial to Bitcoin? You can beam some bit-love my way: 197usDS6AsL9wDKxtGM6xaWjmR5ejgqem7 Need to cancel an existing donation? (It's okay â life changes course. I treasure your kindness and appreciate your support for as long as it lasted.) You can do so [on this page](.
KINDRED READINGS: [The Art of Being Alone: May Sarton's Stunning 1938 Ode to Solitude]( * * * [Aloneness, Belonging, and the Paradox of Vulnerability, in Love and Creative Work]( * * * [How to Bear Your Loneliness: Grounding Wisdom from the Great Buddhist Teacher Pema Chödrön]( * * * A SMALL, DELIGHTFUL SIDE PROJECT: [Uncommon Presents from the Past: Gifts for the Science-Lover and Nature-Ecstatic in Your Life, Benefitting the Nature Conservancy]( [---]( You're receiving this email because you subscribed on TheMarginalian.org (formerly BrainPickings.org). This weekly newsletter comes out each Wednesday and offers a hand-picked piece worth revisiting from my 15-year archive.
The Marginalian MAIL NOT DELIVERED
47 Bergen Street, 3rd FloorBrooklyn, NY 11201
[Add us to your address book](
[unsubscribe from this list]( Â Â [update subscription preferences](