NOTE: This newsletter might be cut short by your email program. [View it in full](.  If a friend forwarded it to you and you'd like your very own newsletter, [subscribe here]( â it's free.  Need to modify your subscription? You can [change your email address]( or [unsubscribe](. [The Marginalian]( [Welcome] Hello {NAME}! This is the midweek edition of [The Marginalian]( by Maria Popova â one piece resurfaced from the sixteen-year archive as timeless uplift for heart, mind, and spirit. If you missed last week's archival resurrection â Yes to Life, in Spite of Everything: Viktor Frankl's lost lectures on the deepest source of meaning â you can catch up [right here](. And if my labor of love enriches your life in any way, please consider supporting it with a [donation]( â it remains free and ad-free and alive thanks to reader patronage. If you already donate: I appreciate you more than you know. [FROM THE ARCHIVE | Frida Kahlo on How Love Amplifies Beauty: Her Breathtaking Tribute to Diego Rivera]( artists, Frida Kahlo (July 6, 1907âJuly 13, 1954) and Diego Rivera (December 8, 1886âNovember 24, 1957) each possessed boundless talent bolstered by an unbending will. As partners, they possessed each other with a ferocious love, intense and complicated and all-eclipsing â the kind for which, in Rilkeâs immortal words, [âall other work is but preparation.â]( They wed when Kahlo was twenty-two and Rivera forty-two, and remained together until Kahloâs death twenty-five years later. They had an open marriage long before the term existed as a trend of modern romance â both had multiple affairs, Rivera with women and Kahlo with both men and women, most notably with the American-born French singer, dancer, and actress Josephine Baker and with the Russian Marxist theorist Leon Trotsky. Still, both insisted that they were the love of each otherâs life â a deep conviction crystallized in Kahloâs [passionate love letters]( and Riveraâs [affectionate account]( of their first encounter. But nowhere does their uncommon love come more vibrantly alive than in Kahloâs portrait of Rivera, written twenty years into their marriage for a catalog accompanying one of his major exhibitions and later included as an afterword to his autobiography, [My Art, My Life]( ([public library](. In just a few wholehearted, wholebodied paragraphs, she captures the enormity of their love. Her sincere humanity radiates a testament to the enormity of all love as a transfiguring force, the ultimate wellspring of beauty and grace. Kahlo begins: I warn you that in this picture I am painting of Diego there will be colors which even I am not fully acquainted with. Besides, I love Diego so much I cannot be an objective speculator of him or his life⦠I cannot speak of Diego as my husband because that term, when applied to him, is an absurdity. He never has been, nor will he ever be, anybodyâs husband. I also cannot speak of him as my lover because to me, he transcends by far the domain of sex. And if I attempt to speak of him purely, as a soul, I shall only end up by painting my own emotions. Yet considering these obstacles of sentiment, I shall try to sketch his image to the best of my ability. Under the wildly affectionate gaze of her sketch, Rivera â a man physically unattractive by our cultureâs conventional standards of beauty â is transformed into an exquisite, magical, almost supernatural creature. We are left with a bone-deep awareness that the true splendor of a human being, as Ursula K. Le Guin [so elegantly demonstrated]( a generation later, is something quite different from âbeauty.â What emerges is ultimately a portrait less of Rivera than of Kahloâs own astonishing capacity for love and beauty in the largest possible sense. Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo in Mexico, 1933 (Photograph by Martin Munkácsi) Kahlo sketches Rivera: Growing up from his Asiatic-type head is his fine, thin hair, which somehow gives the impression that it is floating in air. He looks like an immense baby with an amiable but sad-looking face. His wide, dark, and intelligent bulging eyes appear to be barely held in place by his swollen eyelids. They protrude like the eyes of a frog, each separated from the other in a most extraordinary way. They thus seem to enlarge his field of vision beyond that of most persons. It is almost as if they were constructed exclusively for a painter of vast spaces and multitudes. The effect produced by these unusual eyes, situated so far away from each other, encourages one to speculate on the ages-old oriental knowledge contained behind them. On rare occasions, an ironic yet tender smile appears on his Buddha-like lips. Seeing him in the nude, one is immediately reminded of a young boy-frog standing on his hind legs. His skin is greenish-white, very like that of an aquatic animal. The only dark parts of his whole body are his hands and face, and that is because they are sunburned. His shoulders are like a childâs, narrow and round. They progress without any visible hint of angles, their tapering rotundity making them seem almost feminine. The arms diminish regularly into small, sensitive hands⦠It is incredible to think that these hands have been capable of achieving such a prodigious number of paintings. Another wonder is that they can still work as indefatigably as they do. Diegoâs chest â of it we have to say, that had he landed on an island governed by Sappho, where male invaders were apt to be executed, Diego would never have been in danger. The sensitivity of his marvelous breasts would have insured his welcome, although his masculine virility, specific and strange, would have made him equally desired in the lands of these queens avidly hungering for masculine love. His enormous belly, smooth, tightly drawn, and sphere-shaped, is supported by two strong legs which are as beautifully solid as classical columns. They end in feet which point outward at an obtuse angle, as if moulded for a stance wide enough to cover the entire earth. He sleeps in a foetal position. In his waking hours, he walks with a languorous elegance as if accustomed to living in a liquefied medium. By his movements, one would think that he found air denser to wade through than water. Art by Yuyi Morales from [Viva Frida]( a lovely picture-book celebrating Kahloâs life and legacy From this intimate portrait of the man emerges an intimate portrait of the artist as a wholly integrated being, a creature of unselfconscious and uncompromising authenticity: He is eternally curious and, at the same time, an eternal conversationalist. He can paint for hours and days without resting, talking while he works. He talks and argues about everything, absolutely everything, like Walt Whitman, with all who want to listen to him. His conversation is always interesting. He says phrases that amaze you â sometimes they hurt you, other times they move you, but the person who listens is never left with a feeling of fruitlessness or emptiness. His words make one tremendously uncomfortable because they are live and true. His raw concepts weaken or disorient those who listen to him because they donât agree with the already established morals; thus, they always break the bark to let new blossoms come out; they wound to let new cells grow. At the very end of the piece, Kahlo addresses that gruesome yet [all too common]( human tendency to judge other loves from the outside â a violent flattening of the nuance and dimension and enormous richness that exist between two people, perceptible to them alone. She writes: Perhaps it is expected that I should lament about how I have suffered living with a man like Diego. But I do not think that the banks of a river suffer because they let the river flow, nor does the earth suffer because of the rains, nor does the atom suffer for letting its energy escape. To my way of thinking, everything has its natural compensation. Complement [My Art, My Life]( with Mary Oliverâs equally, very differently beautiful [tribute to the love of her life]( then revisit Kahloâs [illustrated love letters]( to Rivera. [Forward to a friend]( Online]( [Like on Facebook]( donating=loving
Each month, I spend thousands of hours and thousands of dollars keeping The Marginalian going. For sixteen years, it has remained free and ad-free and alive thanks to patronage from readers. I have no staff, no interns, not even an assistant â a thoroughly one-woman labor of love that is also my life and my livelihood. If this labor makes your own life more livable in any way, please consider aiding its sustenance with a one-time or loyal donation. Your support makes all the difference. monthly donation
You can become a Sustaining Patron with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a Brooklyn lunch. Â
one-time donation
Or you can become a Spontaneous Supporter with a one-time donation in any amount.
[Start Now]( [Give Now]( Partial to Bitcoin? You can beam some bit-love my way: 197usDS6AsL9wDKxtGM6xaWjmR5ejgqem7 Need to cancel an existing donation? (It's okay â life changes course. I treasure your kindness and appreciate your support for as long as it lasted.) You can do so [on this page](.
KINDRED READINGS: [26-Year-Old Frida Kahloâs Compassionate Letter to 46-Year-Old Georgia OâKeeffe/em>]( * * * [Emily Dickinson's Electric Love Letters to Susan Gilbert]( * * * [Limbic Revision and How Love Rewires the Brain]( * * * A SMALL, DELIGHTFUL SIDE PROJECT: [Uncommon Presents from the Past: Gifts for the Science-Lover and Nature-Ecstatic in Your Life, Benefitting the Nature Conservancy]( [---]( You're receiving this email because you subscribed on TheMarginalian.org (formerly BrainPickings.org). This weekly newsletter comes out each Wednesday and offers a hand-picked piece worth revisiting from my 15-year archive.
The Marginalian MAIL NOT DELIVERED
47 Bergen Street, 3rd FloorBrooklyn, NY 11201
[Add us to your address book](
[unsubscribe from this list]( Â Â [update subscription preferences](