Newsletter Subject

There’s one climate narrative we need to debunk

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Sun, Sep 10, 2023 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

This is the Theme of the Week edition of Bloomberg Opinion Today, a digest of our top commentary pub

This is the Theme of the Week edition of Bloomberg Opinion Today, a digest of our top commentary published every Sunday. Follow us on Instag [Bloomberg]( This is the Theme of the Week edition of [Bloomberg Opinion Today](, a digest of our top commentary published every Sunday. Follow us on [Instagram](, [TikTok](, [X](, [Threads]( and [Facebook](. [No, Climate Scientists Aren’t Being Forced to Exaggerate]( — Mark Gongloff It reads like a climate denier’s dream come true: A prestigious climate scientist publicly confesses he fudged research in order to get published. That’s basically how excited headlines in right-wing media have portrayed scientist Patrick Brown’s [claim]( this week that he oversold the influence of climate change on wildfire risks in order to get a paper published recently in the prestigious journal Nature. But the real story isn’t quite that simple. At the top of his would-be mea culpa, Brown links to a [column I wrote]( about last month’s Maui wildfires, citing it as an example of how the media contributes to a narrative that such conflagrations are “mostly the result of climate change.” While I appreciate the link, I must point out that nowhere in my column do I argue climate change was the primary cause of the Maui fires. A host of other factors contributed to the Maui disaster, from questionable land management to human error. Read the [whole thing](. More Climate Reading: - [Maui’s Wildfire Disaster Demands a National Reckoning]( — Bloomberg’s editorial board - [Burning Man 2023 Is a Climate-Crisis Parable]( — Lara Williams - [Triple Threat to Texas Power Grid Will Keep It Vulnerable]( — Liam Denning - [Modi’s Climate Ambitions for India Are Slipping]( — David Fickling What We’re Watching Most workers lack the resources to invest enough in the stock market. But the US government has plenty of both. Just 37% of people in a recent survey said they believe they are “very likely” to reach their retirement goals, down from 47% a year ago. With limited time and money, amassing the average savings target of $1.8 million is a nearly impossible feat. If the US government gave every baby $10,000 to invest in the stock market, everyone would have enough for retirement. Bloomberg columnist Nir Kaissar breaks down [how to fix the retirement crisis](. Follow Us You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Opinion Today newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.