Newsletter Subject

Google’s AI blunders rival Xerox’s PC mistakes

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Thu, Jul 13, 2023 07:37 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: Athletes get paid and river barges get wider. This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, a highly produc

Also: Athletes get paid and river barges get wider. [Bloomberg]( This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, a highly productive R&D lab of Bloomberg Opinion’s opinions. [Sign up here](. Today’s Agenda - [Google lost]( some top AI talent. - Where [big baseball paychecks]( came from. - The upside of [fewer meetings](. - [Flatter barges]( in a shallower Rhine. Google’s AI Geniuses Have Left the Building The greatest cautionary tale in the history of corporate research and development is Xerox Parc. The Palo Alto Research Center of the then-high-flying copier maker opened its doors in 1970, and over the next few years its employees proceeded to invent [several]( of the most important tools of modern technological life, from graphical user interfaces to networked computers. It was not Xerox, though, that commercialized these innovations. “Why aren’t you doing anything with this? This is the greatest thing,” [shouted]( a young Parc visitor in 1979 after seeing a demonstration of a Xerox Alto computer with mouse and on-screen windows. “This is revolutionary!” Five years later the visitor, Steve Jobs, unveiled the Alto-inspired Apple Macintosh computer. The rest is history, albeit convoluted history given that Microsoft’s Macintosh-inspired Windows operating system then nearly wiped Apple off the map before the latter’s rebirth and iPhone-fueled rise to the top of the global corporate heap. Parc still exists, as [part]( of the nonprofit research institute SRI International. Xerox Holdings Corp. is still around, too, and modestly profitable. Its $2.5 billion market cap is 0.08% of Apple’s, 0.1% of Microsoft’s and 0.16% of Google parent Alphabet’s. These days Alphabet has the world’s highest-profile [R&D operation](. (Amazon.com Inc. tops it in global [R&D spending rankings]( but that’s partly because Amazon refuses to break out R&D in its earnings statements, reporting spending on a broader category that it calls “technology and content” instead.) Its leadership has been trying hard to avoid Xerox’s fate, renaming the company Alphabet in 2015 in part to signal that its R&D investments are meant to grow into other big businesses alongside Google. They still have an awfully long way to go. In the [quarter]( that ended March 31, Alphabet’s non-Google “Other Bets” generated just 0.4% of company revenue. And as Parmy Olson [tells it](, the company’s best idea generators aren’t exactly sticking around. Parmy describes how a [2017 paper]( by eight Google researchers has been crucial to recent advances in artificial intelligence (it proposed a new network architecture called the Transformer that is the “T” in ChatGPT), and details what has happened to the co-authors. One works at ChatGPT creator OpenAI, six have founded or co-founded startups, and the last one is about to leave Google to do so. This can be seen as testament to the continued health of the Silicon Valley startup ecosystem, which after a pretty tough year is still luring smart people away from big companies. The story also may end with Alphabet and other tech giants buying up most of the AI startups. Still, reading Parmy’s account of how Google failed to incorporate the Transformer technology into its products, even as outside firms did, I was struck by this thought: The curse of Xerox Parc hasn’t entirely gone away. Paying to Play There’s a lot of money in sports! With baseball dual threat Shohei Ohtani now shopping himself around for a payday that could top half a billion dollars, historian Stephen Mihm [recounts]( how big paychecks first came to baseball in the 1970s. Before then, Major League players were effectively the property of the teams they played for, and had no real bargaining power to force pay increases. That wasn’t how things had worked in the Negro Leagues, and it’s probably not a coincidence that it was a Black player, Curt Flood of the St. Louis Cardinals, who led the challenge to baseball’s so-called reserve clause. The US Supreme Court [ruled against Flood]( in 1972, but other players subsequently won a relaxation of the reserve clause and much bigger pay packages. In 2021, the Supreme Court unanimously took the opposite side in an athlete-pay dispute, [ruling that]( the National Collegiate Athletic Association could no longer impose strict compensation limits on college athletes. Since then so-called “name, image and license” deals have exploded, with an estimated $900 million handed out from July 2021 to July 2022. That’s fine, [writes]( Adam Minter, but without more transparency on who’s getting paid what, college sports is headed for an era of controversy and possible corruption. Telltale Charts Want happier, more productive employees? Ban meetings, at least for most of the workweek. Sarah Green Carmichael [says]( this is one of several promising approaches for reducing meeting creep. Water levels in the Rhine are very low again this summer, endangering Northern Europe’s supply chains. But Javier Blas [has the details]( on a German innovation that may help solve the problem: wider barges with shallower drafts. Further Reading Exxon [bets big]( on carbon capture. — Liam Denning AMLO empowers [Mexico’s military](. — Eduardo Porter There could still be [a recession](. — Allison Schrager [Industrial demand]( is iffy. — Brooke Sutherland NATO’s [Arctic opportunity](. — James Stavridis [Biden is right]( on cluster bombs. — Bloomberg’s editorial board Celsius [was lying](. — Matt Levine ICYMI Cargill bought [a lot of cocoa](. [Crypto CEO]( charged with fraud. OTC birth control pill [is approved](. Kickers Watch out for the [surfing sea otter](. Many [moon landings]( are in the works. [Farewell](, Anchor Steam Beer. Notes: Please send ideas for world-changing technological advances and feedback to Justin Fox at justinfox@bloomberg.net. [Sign up here]( and follow us on [Threads](, [TikTok](, [Twitter](, [Instagram]( and [Facebook](. Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Opinion Today newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.