Newsletter Subject

Will Congress get serious about Jan. 6?

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Wed, Jun 30, 2021 11:58 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. Now that Senate Re

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe]( Now that Senate Republicans have defeated an independent commission to investigate the Jan. 6 insurrection, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is [moving ahead]( with a backup plan and setting up a House select committee. Right away, she’s going to have a difficult decision to make. By rule, Pelosi has the authority to veto Republican selections for the committee; by custom, parties choose their own members for such panels. But this is, to say the least, an unusual situation. Only a handful of House Republicans voted to impeach former President Donald Trump over the attack on the Capitol. Only 35 voted to support the originally proposed commission. It’s not clear how many Republicans even acknowledge that Joe Biden won the election and was legitimately inaugurated; most of them will at least say that he’s president, but many duck the question of how he got there. Some still back Trump’s false claims about fraud. And a handful participated publicly in riling up the crowd on Jan. 6. One would hope that Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy would only select lawmakers who at least accepted that the attack on the Capitol was a terrible assault on U.S. democracy. We should be prepared to be disappointed, however. For one thing, Politico’s Olivia Beavers [reports]( that few Republicans want to serve on the committee, with the main exceptions being the most enthusiastic Trump supporters. That’s perhaps not surprising. Any Republican who fails to support everything Trump says is liable to draw his wrath, the anger of his strongest supporters and therefore a primary challenge. McCarthy probably isn’t eager to select publicly declared candidates such as Representatives Matt Gaetz (who is in the middle of his own scandal), Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert — all of whom are loose cannons who would be more likely to backfire against the Republicans than help. But he also is unlikely to pick lawmakers who voted for the independent commission and might try to take this investigation seriously; instead, he’ll probably seek Trump allies such as Representative Jim Jordan, who will attempt to make the proceedings a clown show without necessarily acting like the main clowns. That’s where Pelosi will have a decision to make. She’s already [circulating]( the possibility that she might choose a Republican for one of the eight spots. That might give her some space to veto one or more of McCarthy’s picks. My first instinct was that she should draw a line in the sand — such as requiring that all committee members accept that Biden won the election. But on second thought, I’m not so sure that’s worth doing. What’s really important is that the committee’s rules and procedures be stacked in favor of a serious investigation. With such rules in place, and a strong group of Democrats on board, it probably isn’t worth fighting over which Republicans are involved. The media already believes (with good reason!) that the insurrection was a really bad thing and that Republicans were responsible for blocking a nonpartisan commission to look into it. I think it’s unlikely that adding a group of Trump loyalists to the select committee will change that. 1. Susan P. Liebell on John Locke and [dangerous Second Amendment narratives](. 2. Christina Greer on [Kamala Harris](. 3. Dave Hopkins on [Harris and the vice presidency](. One thing I’d add: All vice presidents become objects of ridicule; it just seems to go with the job. No matter how impressive the occupant was previously, the office tends to at least temporarily diminish them. But in the long run, former vice presidents are almost invariably considered well qualified for the presidency. 4. Tom Paskhalis, Bryn Rosenfeld and Katerina Tertytchnaya at the Monkey Cage on [authoritarian control of the media](. 5. Walter Olson on [the Electoral Count Act of 1887](. 6. Joyce White Vance on the [Justice Department’s action against Georgia](. 7. And Neil Irwin on [post-pandemic supply chains](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close. Sponsored Content The power of PayPal online, now in person. Give your small business an easy way to accept touch-free, in-person payments. Create a unique QR code with the PayPal app and display it on your device or as a printout in store. [Download the app.]( Customer must have PayPal account and app to pay. PayPal Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.