Newsletter Subject

Is Obamacare finally here to stay?

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 18, 2021 11:50 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. Way back when, I m

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe.]( Way back when, I made three predictions about the Affordable Care Act, which survived another [brush with death]( on Thursday in yet another court case. The one I was right about was that Obamacare would survive. That was relatively easy. The U.S. political system has a strong status-quo bias, and once the ACA was passed it became difficult to dislodge. In part, that’s because it’s just difficult to enact things. But it’s also extremely difficult for elected officials to take stuff away from their constituents. It’s easy to bash Obamacare, but hard to shut down the exchanges it established or to take insurance away from people. It’s so hard to take away protections for pre-existing conditions that Republicans have been swearing up and down in recent years that they’d never imagine doing such a thing (even though repealing the ACA, as they wanted, would do exactly that). Perhaps worse, Obamacare was such a sprawling bill that scrapping it would risk massive chaos. Politicians rarely do such things. More interesting, I think, are the things I got wrong. The first was that I thought Obamacare would last, but be unpopular. My logic was pretty simple. Republicans clearly were going to bash the law forever. And many of its benefits were either invisible — a lot of people now don’t realize that their minor medical issues would’ve prevented them from getting insurance pre-ACA — or, like the expansion of Medicaid, not branded as part of Obamacare. So I suspected that few would have reason to support the law, many would have strong partisan reasons for disliking it, and it would be an easy target for anyone who was unhappy with any aspect of health care. And yet Obamacare these days is [moderately popular](. One reason is that Barack Obama himself is a moderately popular former president. Calling the law “Obamacare” may have hurt Democrats in 2010, but in the long run it probably helped it poll better. Another reason? Repeated Republican attempts to repeal the law probably helped Democrats associate it with its most popular provisions. On top of that, while the law was associated with a somewhat popular president, opposition was associated with congressional Republicans (members of Congress are rarely popular) and, eventually, with the unpopular Donald Trump. Advantage ACA. My final prediction was that after the initial attempt to repeal Obamacare, the law itself would fade from the news, and we’d return to normal health-care politics — with Democrats seeking to spend more on benefits and Republicans focused on reducing spending and stopping mismanagement and fraud. I thought that would happen at least five years ago. Instead, we’ve been fighting over whether the ACA should exist, be repealed, or, as the Bernie Sanders Democrats say, be replaced with a single-payer system. It’s possible we’re finally getting there. President Joe Biden’s decisive victory over Sanders in the nomination battle last year may have reset the Democrats’ agenda to incremental, rather than radical, change, and made the issue perhaps lower among the party’s priorities than it seemed 18 months ago. Besides, when it comes to Republican-aligned media, there are newer products to sell, whether it’s opposition to teaching about racism or [flaky recounts to long-settled elections](. Perhaps the parties will fight over somewhat higher or lower subsidies on the exchanges and other questions that, while important, leave the basic structure of health insurance in place. But perhaps not. 1. Dave Hopkins on [the Obamacare lawsuit](. 2. Sarah Khan at the Monkey Cage on [Malala Yousafzai, marriage and Pakistan.]( 3. Margot Sanger-Katz and Sarah Kliff on the [health-care battles to come](. 4. John Harwood on [Republican obstruction](. 5. Kevin Kruse on [Martin Luther King Jr. and the Texas law about teaching race](. 6. And William Saletan on [Biden, Putin … and Trump](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close. Sponsored Content The power of PayPal online, now in person. Give your small business an easy way to accept touch-free, in-person payments. Create a unique QR code with the PayPal app and display it on your device or as a printout in store. [Download the app.]( Customer must have PayPal account and app to pay. PayPal Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Sent On

04/06/2024

Sent On

03/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.