[Bloomberg](
Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernsteinâs newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe]( Candidate recruitment and even some actual campaigning has already begun for next yearâs midterm elections; after all, thereâs less than a year to go before the first midterm primaries. Normally, Iâd tell you that midterm elections are fairly predictable. The presidentâs party usually loses ground, with the presidentâs popularity and the partyâs âexposureâ â the number of vulnerable seats it has â limiting or increasing the damage. So 2022 would be a good year for Republicans, although their gains would probably be somewhat smaller than usual because Democrats, especially in the U.S. House of Representatives and in state legislatures, lost ground in 2020. Then Iâd say: Watch President Joe Bidenâs approval ratings, and those will tell you the rest of whatâs predictable. And thatâs probably what will matter most next November. But there are several unusual factors that could change things. Letâs get to it: The pandemic. If things go well, the coronavirus plague will be long gone by next fall. Thatâs most likely to mean it would have little electoral effect. Iâd bet that Democrats campaigning on ending the pandemic would be tuned out by voters who are more interested in the present and future. But we donât really have evidence one way or another about whether a once-in-a-century health disaster could be different. [If the virus returns]( over the winter and then again next fall, would voters hold it against the incumbent party? Thereâs no way to know. The economy. Political scientists have found that the economy generally affects midterm elections indirectly, through its effect on the presidentâs popularity. But thatâs the normal economy, not the pandemic and post-pandemic version. Normally, a strong recovery from a recession would help the president and therefore the presidentâs party, but even if the economic statistics appear strong, will most voters feel prosperous? The wild swings over the last year suggest that we canât be as confident as usual. Trump. Normally, former presidents have zero impact on midterm elections. Jimmy Carter was still unpopular in 1982, two years after leaving office, but that didnât save Republicans from getting clobbered. The same was true of George W. Bush in the Republican banner year of 2010. That might still be the case with Donald Trump. But he is trying a lot harder than Carter or Bush to stay in in the limelight. Democrats would be more than happy to have another election thatâs a referendum on Trump; at this point Iâd bet against that happening, but you never know. Cheating. Unfortunately, it appears that this factor is going to have to be on the list going forward. After an election in which Trump and many other Republicans invented false claims of fraud and unsuccessfully pressured election administrators to overturn the honest results, and after Republicans have attempted to change [laws]( and [personnel]( so that those efforts would not be frustrated again, we canât be confident that the 2022 and 2024 elections will be on the level in many states. Republican dysfunction. Since the Tea Partyâs rise starting in 2009, Republicans have occasionally thrown away winnable elections by nominating candidates who werenât competitive. Still, there havenât been many of those electorally awful nominees, and there probably wonât be this time. Probably. The big caveat is that adding Trump and his endorsements and threats to the Republican nomination mix could produce several disasters for the party. On the other hand, Trumpâs interventions in nomination politics were only marginally costly during his presidency, and itâs not even clear how much influence heâll have in 2022 Republican primaries. In other words? Most likely, this and the other potentially unusual factors bearing on the midterms will fizzle out. But theyâre all worth keeping an eye on. 1. Ashley Daniels and Pearl K. Dowe at the Monkey Cage on [Representative Val Demings as a Democratic Senate candidate]( in Florida. 2. Dan Drezner on [the Belarus situation](. 3. John Hudak on [Biden administration marijuana policy](. 4. Dean Baker on [inflation worries](. 5. Nathaniel Rakich on [partisan games in filling U.S. House vacancies](. 6. My Bloomberg Opinion colleague Robert A. George [on House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy](. 7. And Kevin Drum on the reasons for [vaccine reluctance](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. Youâll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close. Paid Post The power of PayPal online, now in person. Give your small business an easy way to accept touch-free, in-person payments. Create a unique QR code with the PayPal app and display it on your device or as a printout in store. [Download the app.](Â
Customer must have PayPal account and app to pay. PayPal  Before itâs here, itâs on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals canât find anywhere else. [Learn more](. Â
You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter.
[Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us](
Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022