Newsletter Subject

Five X factors for the 2022 midterms

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Wed, May 26, 2021 11:34 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. Candidate recruitm

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe]( Candidate recruitment and even some actual campaigning has already begun for next year’s midterm elections; after all, there’s less than a year to go before the first midterm primaries. Normally, I’d tell you that midterm elections are fairly predictable. The president’s party usually loses ground, with the president’s popularity and the party’s “exposure” — the number of vulnerable seats it has — limiting or increasing the damage. So 2022 would be a good year for Republicans, although their gains would probably be somewhat smaller than usual because Democrats, especially in the U.S. House of Representatives and in state legislatures, lost ground in 2020. Then I’d say: Watch President Joe Biden’s approval ratings, and those will tell you the rest of what’s predictable. And that’s probably what will matter most next November. But there are several unusual factors that could change things. Let’s get to it: The pandemic. If things go well, the coronavirus plague will be long gone by next fall. That’s most likely to mean it would have little electoral effect. I’d bet that Democrats campaigning on ending the pandemic would be tuned out by voters who are more interested in the present and future. But we don’t really have evidence one way or another about whether a once-in-a-century health disaster could be different. [If the virus returns]( over the winter and then again next fall, would voters hold it against the incumbent party? There’s no way to know. The economy. Political scientists have found that the economy generally affects midterm elections indirectly, through its effect on the president’s popularity. But that’s the normal economy, not the pandemic and post-pandemic version. Normally, a strong recovery from a recession would help the president and therefore the president’s party, but even if the economic statistics appear strong, will most voters feel prosperous? The wild swings over the last year suggest that we can’t be as confident as usual. Trump. Normally, former presidents have zero impact on midterm elections. Jimmy Carter was still unpopular in 1982, two years after leaving office, but that didn’t save Republicans from getting clobbered. The same was true of George W. Bush in the Republican banner year of 2010. That might still be the case with Donald Trump. But he is trying a lot harder than Carter or Bush to stay in in the limelight. Democrats would be more than happy to have another election that’s a referendum on Trump; at this point I’d bet against that happening, but you never know. Cheating. Unfortunately, it appears that this factor is going to have to be on the list going forward. After an election in which Trump and many other Republicans invented false claims of fraud and unsuccessfully pressured election administrators to overturn the honest results, and after Republicans have attempted to change [laws]( and [personnel]( so that those efforts would not be frustrated again, we can’t be confident that the 2022 and 2024 elections will be on the level in many states. Republican dysfunction. Since the Tea Party’s rise starting in 2009, Republicans have occasionally thrown away winnable elections by nominating candidates who weren’t competitive. Still, there haven’t been many of those electorally awful nominees, and there probably won’t be this time. Probably. The big caveat is that adding Trump and his endorsements and threats to the Republican nomination mix could produce several disasters for the party. On the other hand, Trump’s interventions in nomination politics were only marginally costly during his presidency, and it’s not even clear how much influence he’ll have in 2022 Republican primaries. In other words? Most likely, this and the other potentially unusual factors bearing on the midterms will fizzle out. But they’re all worth keeping an eye on. 1. Ashley Daniels and Pearl K. Dowe at the Monkey Cage on [Representative Val Demings as a Democratic Senate candidate]( in Florida. 2. Dan Drezner on [the Belarus situation](. 3. John Hudak on [Biden administration marijuana policy](. 4. Dean Baker on [inflation worries](. 5. Nathaniel Rakich on [partisan games in filling U.S. House vacancies](. 6. My Bloomberg Opinion colleague Robert A. George [on House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy](. 7. And Kevin Drum on the reasons for [vaccine reluctance](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close. Paid Post The power of PayPal online, now in person. Give your small business an easy way to accept touch-free, in-person payments. Create a unique QR code with the PayPal app and display it on your device or as a printout in store. [Download the app.]( Customer must have PayPal account and app to pay. PayPal  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.