Newsletter Subject

George Shultz was a model of public service

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Mon, Feb 8, 2021 12:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. . The death of Ame

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. The death of American statesman [George P. Shultz]( at 100, just before the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump … well, it’s hard to not see it as a symbol for everything wrong with today’s Republican Party. Shultz was a good example of how a reasonably healthy party operates. Parties need governing professionals — people who actually know how to make things work after an election is won. And healthy parties look out for and promote talented people. Shultz worked for Dwight Eisenhower’s Council of Economic Advisers. He was Richard Nixon’s labor secretary, director of the Office of Management and Budget, and treasury secretary. Then from 1982 on, he was Ronald Reagan’s secretary of state. By all accounts, he acquitted himself well in each of these jobs. Most notably, he played an important role in recognizing that Mikhail Gorbachev’s Soviet Union was very different from what had come before, and that real progress was possible on issues such as arms reduction. He refused to help Nixon’s corrupt plans during Watergate, while the schemers within the Reagan administration worked behind his back during the Iran-Contra affair. That’s not to say that none of his policy decisions over the years were without controversy. But he served the nation well, and the Republican Party was better off with him as one of its leaders. It’s not the 1950s. Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan (and Democrats of the time as well) recruited from a very narrow slice of the population. Shultz, who went from a Connecticut prep school to Princeton, then rose through the meritocracy to earn a Ph.D. before entering government service, traveled paths that were closed off to most Americans. Joe Biden’s administration, like Barack Obama’s before it, shows how a reasonably healthy party can be open to many previously excluded sources of governing professionals. Of course, we won’t know for some time which of Biden’s picks are Shultz-like successes and which are failures. But we do know that Democrats (like Republicans in the 1950s through the 1980s) keep replenishing their talent pool. And then there’s the Trump Republicans. It’s hard to identify many veterans of that administration who appear ready to staff the next Republican presidency, let alone be a future George Shultz. And after George W. Bush made progress in diversifying the party’s governing professionals, Trump walked it back several steps. All this matters: Bill Clinton’s presidency, which came after a long stretch of mostly Republican administrations, didn’t have a lot of executive-branch experience to rely on — which helped to produce a wasted honeymoon. Again, experience doesn’t necessarily produce success, but inexperience is a serious obstacle to any administration. And cultivating people willing to work with Trump doesn’t seem like a promising way to build a party’s governing capacity. So the current Republican Party might want to reflect a bit on George Shultz, a hero of the republic, and think about how to produce more like him. 1. Seth Masket on [bipartisanship, direct benefits and electoral incentives](. 2. Josh Putnam on [the New Hampshire primary](. 3. Ray La Raja on [transparency in government](. 4. Bethany Albertson and Julia Azari talk about what’s going on [within the Republican Party](. 5. Matthew Green at the Monkey Cage on [the attempt to purge Liz Cheney](. 6. John M. Carey on [Trump and constitutional design](. 7. And Stanley Plotkin, Norman Baylor and Keona Jeane Wynne propose a one-time [National Vaccine Day](. Nice idea! Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.