Newsletter Subject

What are Republicans really up to?

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Mon, Jan 4, 2021 12:59 PM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. . After Nancy Pelo

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. After Nancy Pelosi was re-elected as speaker of the House on Sunday with the votes of several Democrats who wouldn’t vote for her in 2019, political scientist Matt Glassman [reminded us]( that we can’t always assume that the surface reading of politics is all that’s going on: “Former defectors on the Speakership vote coming home to Pelosi now that the margin is tighter is a good reminder that most Speakership defections are (quite naturally) position-taking political moves and (often) blessed by leadership, not all-out hostility against the Speaker.” That’s also why it’s difficult to interpret what’s happening within the Republican Party. The truth is, we’re seeing [a lot of appalling things](. At least some congressional Republicans this week are planning to vote to throw out the results of the presidential election simply because they can (or, that is, they could if their colleagues would vote with them). And this effort is actually only the third-nuttiest theory this week that some of these representatives support. (For the record: It’s less nutty than the Texas lawsuit that more than 100 House Republicans supported that claimed some states can order others to switch their electoral votes just because they don’t like the results, and that in turn is less nutty than the theory in Representative [Louie Gohmert’s lawsuit]( that the Constitution gives the vice president full authority to choose any electors he wants, and therefore dictate the results of presidential elections, so long as a state legislator asks him to.) But it’s also true that none of these Republicans have the votes to do anything, and that [those who have been in a position]( to advance President Donald Trump’s evidence-free claims of fraud have instead chosen to uphold the rule of law. As have many other [Republicans in Congress]( and most of the party’s former [elected]( and [governing officials](. The problem is that we don’t know what either side is really up to. It’s possible that Gohmert and his allies, all of whom knew that they didn’t have the votes to overturn the election, were just play-acting and trying to differentiate themselves from mainstream conservatives. But at the same time, those politicians who were doing the right thing also knew that the votes weren’t there, given the House Democratic majority and the certainty that there was no Senate majority for stealing the election. Perhaps if the election was a bit closer, or the allegations of fraud a little more plausible, then they would’ve been tempted to join with the conspirators. If the question is one of judging these politicians, then all that counts is what they actually did: Those who supported the rule of law deserve credit, and those who didn’t deserve condemnation. But if the question is about where the Republican Party is and what it is capable of doing, then we need to admit that there’s plenty of uncertainty. Perhaps none of them really mean it. Perhaps more do than we know. What we can say for sure is that quite a few Republicans (including, of course, the outgoing president) are willing to undermine constitutional government, and that they’re severely eroding what used to be a consensus in support of democracy and the rule of law. We can also conclude that many Republican politicians think that doing so is hardly political suicide, and indeed may advance them within the party. And that’s dangerous enough. 1. Really nice [year-ender from Julia Azari at Mischiefs of Faction](. 2. Also at Mischiefs: Matthew Green on [governing with a small majority](. 3. Dan Drezner highlights [articles on political economy from 2020](. 4. Joseph M. Brown at the Monkey Cage on the [Nashville bomber](. 5. And my Bloomberg Opinion colleague Michael R. Strain on [Republican populists](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](. Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.