Newsletter Subject

I voted 26 times this week. That’s too much.

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Fri, Oct 23, 2020 11:58 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. . I voted! I almos

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2) Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). I voted! I almost always vote on Election Day, at my local polling place, even though here in San Antonio we’re now allowed to vote anywhere in the county. This year, however, I was more eager to avoid the lines during a pandemic, and so when my internet went down on Wednesday I went off to the polls early. It took me a few tries, and I wound up standing in a longer line than I probably would have had I waited. It took 40 minutes from the moment I got in line to when I put my completed ballot in the machine (we now have touch-screen voting that creates a paper ballot, a nice improvement). Four of those minutes were devoted to actual voting. One of the reasons the U.S. has such long lines at the ballot box is because we make voters do a lot more than what those in other democracies do. I voted 26 times Wednesday — national, state, and local offices, executive and legislative and judicial. There would’ve been more, but nine offices were uncontested (and in a sign of major change over the past few years, only one of those was Republican-only). Twenty-two choices were easy ones, even if the offices themselves get a little obscure, because they’re partisan elections and so voters can just vote by party. One, for school board, was non-partisan, which required some more advanced prep. And then there were three city ballot measures, which required some work as well. Not a lot — our mayor supported all three, and I like the mayor, so I voted “yes” — but, all in all, there was a fair amount of research required. Plus, this was my third election of the year, the sixth one of the two-year cycle, and the 12th of the four-year cycle. There would’ve been one or two more, but some got consolidated because of the virus. I wound up casting 70 votes this year, 83 over the two-year cycle, and a whopping 228 votes over the four-year cycle since the 2016 general election. That’s far more, over just four years, than regular voters in many democracies will cast in a lifetime of perfect turnout. That’s too much! I do like the long U.S. ballot and frequent elections, but still: We ask voters to either do way too much work or to risk being alienated from the experience. If it were up to me, I’d eliminate all judicial elections, scrap all voter-sponsored ballot measures, at least at the statewide level, and reduce the number of executive offices to vote for. Empower mayors and county executives and governors to select more officials, and then I can at least try to hold them responsible without having to also determine how I feel about the occupants of dozens of other offices. Ballots would still be relatively long, but at least the process would be somewhat more manageable. Jennifer Victor has a nice piece about the [virtues of voting]( despite a realistic understanding of the limits of the ballot. My view is that voting is training-wheels democracy: It’s the easiest, and at the individual level the least consequential, democratic act. But it’s also good practice for other forms of participation. Voting doesn’t only teach us about parties and candidates and offices. It also teaches us about democratic frustration (just because you turn out to vote doesn’t mean you get what you want) and about the paradox of individual participation (one vote really is almost never enough to do anything, but collectively voting makes a huge difference). Both of those lessons, in turn, clarify the realities of democratic politics — the true diversity of opinion and interest within the electorate, and the complex relationship between individual and group action. And that’s useful preparation for electioneering, or interest-group lobbying, or organized protests, or any other kind of political action. It isn’t true that every activist begins with a vote. But that’s often how it starts. 1. Elizabeth N. Saunders at the Monkey Cage on [foreign policy and the 2020 elections](. 2. Also at the Monkey Cage: Susan Liebell on [originalism](. 3. Alison Dagnes at Mischiefs of Faction on [Trump as a comedian](. 4. John Sides on [optimists, pessimists and the pandemic](. 5. Dave Hopkins [on the debate](. 6. Ezra Klein on [the 2020 election and democracy](. 7. Jonathan Cohn on [Trump’s fictional health-care plan](. 8. Adam Serwer on [democracy and the courts](. 9. Bloomberg’s Shawn Donnan on [Trump and offshoring](. 10. And Larry Levitt on [pre-existing conditions](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.