Newsletter Subject

What to expect on an odd election night

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Wed, Sep 2, 2020 12:06 PM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/21388511.16254/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9ib3Bpbml

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/21388511.16254/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9ib3Bpbmlvbg/57d8157f3f92a424d68d6450Bbd14a4e2 [Get the newsletter](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2) Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). A Democratic data and analytics group called Hawkfish (disclosure: funded by Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP) is sounding the alarm about what they’ve named the “[red mirage](” — the pattern in which election night vote counts will tend to be more Republican than the eventual final tally. That’s been the case for several election cycles, and there’s a good chance the effect will be magnified this year for two reasons: More voters are choosing to vote absentee, and because of President Donald Trump’s scare stories, more Democrats than Republicans will likely be mailing in their votes. Let’s get the basics on the table: - There’s nothing wrong with slow counts of absentee ballots. It’s more important to get the count right than to do it fast.  - Absentee votes take longer to tabulate because they’re safe. It takes time, for example, to check signatures and otherwise ensure that a ballot is legitimate.  - The reason for heavier use of mail voting in 2020 is simple: It’s the pandemic.  - The [evidence]( in past elections is that absentee voting helps neither party.  - Democrats tend to gain in counting after Election Day because of who votes when (for instance, older voters tend to vote as soon as they can while younger voters tend to wait until the last minute). This pattern has held in states where Republicans dominate as well as in California where Democrats hold most offices, so it’s about when people vote, not who is counting the ballots.  - Trump will cry fraud regardless of evidence or results. We know this because he’s falsely cried fraud before, even in 2016 when he won. The conclusion we should draw from all of this is that the count will take a while in many states — especially those where ballots need only be postmarked, not delivered, by Election Day. And we should expect the count to move toward Democrats after the initial tally. The news media should prepare everyone for these facts in advance, and then cover the results with them in mind. Just as good reporters have always cautioned readers about early returns and disparate voting patterns in various states, this year they’ll need to be alert to different absentee practices. The good news is that I’m seeing a fair amount of this awareness already. That said: We shouldn’t overdo it. Hawkfish is presenting a scenario in which an apparent 408-130 win for the president on Nov. 3 eventually becomes a 334-204 Biden victory. That’s not impossible, but it’s a stretch. Many states count their absentee ballots rapidly; the California pattern of taking weeks to get it done is relatively rare. It’s possible that normally quick states will collapse this year given unprecedented use of mail voting, but most have been preparing for that possibility and are unlikely to be completely overwhelmed. As Politico’s Steven Shepard [points out](, large media organizations will also have exit polls, and while those are hardly perfect, the people who run them have had many cycles to get used to early and absentee voting. The basic principle here is very simple: All votes cast legitimately should be counted. In 2000, we didn’t know who the next president would be for a few weeks, and it was still fine. The good news is that even with the various slow counts, if the presidential election isn’t close then we’ll probably know the winner promptly in any case. If the election is close, then waiting is pretty normal. And when Trump claims fraud, just ignore him. 1. Julia Azari on the [Republican convention and democracy](. Must-read. 2. Seth Masket on Trump and [breaking the rules](. 3. Kyle Peyton, Paige E. Vaughn and Gregory A. Huber at the Monkey Cage on [public opinion about policing](. 4. S.V. Date on one of the many head-of-state responsibilities Trump hasn’t been doing, [despite claims at his convention](. 5. Ronald Brownstein on all the [Republicans endorsing former Vice President Joe Biden](. 6. Fred Kaplan on [military tactics and the police](. 7. Philip Klein on [how Biden would govern](. 8. And the latest from the Bright Line Watch — experts concerned about [democracy in the U.S](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Sent On

04/06/2024

Sent On

03/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.