Newsletter Subject

On virus testing, Trump may have finally learned his lesson

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 28, 2020 11:53 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/20155788.16227/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9ib3Bpbml

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/20155788.16227/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9ib3Bpbmlvbg/57d8157f3f92a424d68d6450B592c74f6 [Get the newsletter](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2) Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). In most respects, Monday’s coronavirus task force briefing was virtually identical to what we’ve been seeing for weeks now. It did, however, provide something rare for this presidency. Here’s the story. For quite some time, President Donald Trump has maintained that his administration was rolling out a sufficient number of test kits, despite widespread criticism to the contrary and warnings about the need for massively increased screening once the economy begins to reopen. Did his bravado have behind-the-scenes consequences? It’s hard to say, but generally presidents who say publicly that everything is going swimmingly find it difficult to simultaneously push for improvements within the executive branch. Moreover, Trump’s apparent stubbornness on this subject may well have been more than just a show. We do know that the administration has generally opposed a push from House Democrats to spend more on testing. Some pundits have even [speculated]( that Trump was actively opposing a significant ramp-up in order to keep the “numbers” low. In any event, it’s clear that virus screening got off to an extremely slow start and then, after an increase in March, [stalled out in mid-April](. All of that started to change last week. Daily testing numbers began to increase again, and Vice President Mike Pence promised a further boost soon, a message totally out of sync with Trump’s insistence that levels were already more than sufficient. Monday’s briefing was even clearer: While Trump didn’t actually retreat from his claims, much of the session was devoted to Pence and various businesspeople talking about recent gains in screening and plans for a dramatic further increase. The lesson here? No one in the White House press corps or (as far as I could tell) anywhere else seemed to care that Trump’s old claims had become [inoperative](. Trump demonstrated that the way for a president to move on from a ridiculous assertion is to just move on from it. No one really cares about whether the president is being consistent. They care if his current claims are accurate and if the underlying substance is positive. If Trump failed to push hard on testing until recently just to keep his previous statements plausible, he was making a serious mistake; to the extent he’s now adjusting the statements and paying more attention to getting the substance right, he’s doing a better job. Now, with Trump, you never know. He may shuffle out on Tuesday and against insist that there’s plenty of testing, ignoring the show that went on around him on Monday. If so, he’ll be making it harder to achieve what’s needed to actually control the virus and get the economy moving. But perhaps, on this one, he’s finally learned his lesson. 1. Sarah Binder at the Monkey Cage on [Congress during the pandemic](. 2. Dan Drezner on the “[toddler-in-chief](.” 3. Geoffrey Skelley on the still-early polling on [Trump against former Vice President Joe Biden](. I agree that we’re now close enough to the election that those polls aren’t totally meaningless — but I’m not convinced that they add much value when there’s an incumbent president on the ballot and we can look at his approval rating. 4. Robert McCartney on the [danger of letting state and local governments go broke](. 5. Jonathan Chait on the [division of labor in the White House](. 6. My Bloomberg Opinion colleague Timothy L. O'Brien on [Trump and the postal service](. 7. And Caroline Bechtel on [military humor](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.