Newsletter Subject

Americans support the shutdown, not the protests

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 20, 2020 11:56 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/20077907.16097/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9ib3Bpbml

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/20077907.16097/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9ib3Bpbmlvbg/57d8157f3f92a424d68d6450B0e5a0f57 [Get the newsletter](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2) Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). What exactly are we to make of the protests against the current shutdown to fight the coronavirus pandemic? For one thing, they’re small and unrepresentative: The vast majority of U.S. citizens say they support the shutdown policy, and that support is if anything growing. Political scientist John Sides [has the data](. “Cancel all meetings or gatherings of more than 10 people, like sports events, concerts, conferences, etc.” has 87% of the public’s support. “Restrict all non-essential travel outside the home" has 86% support, while 88% agree that we should “Encourage people to stay in their homes and avoid socializing with others." Sides adds that strong support for these and similar measures is at 64%, which is up a bit from March. So when ABC News [claims]( that these protests indicate that “Opposition to COVID-19 stay-at-home orders has continued to build from coast to coast” they’re just plain wrong. Now, it’s also the case that these protests appear to be “[astroturfed](” — that is, they’re organized efforts by national political groups intended to show grass-roots support. That doesn’t mean that they’re not real, or shouldn’t be covered by the media. But the sponsors are part of the story too, as is the fact that public opinion is overwhelmingly on the other side. That should be the context when deciding whether to spend scarce media time on this story. What adds to the confusion is that these rallies are often done in the name of President Donald Trump, even though they’re protesting Trump’s own policies. After all, while state governors are the immediate targets of the protests, and are generally the ones putting the restrictions in place, those policies are fully consistent with what the Trump administration has been recommending. Yes, Trump himself has been ambivalent about them at times, but he’s been mostly committed since extending the federal guidelines through the end of April.  It’s true that there are still a few voices within the Republican-aligned media who are downplaying the pandemic, even as the infections and death tolls continue to rise. But again to Trump’s credit, he has largely separated himself from such talk. If anything, he’s been inflating the damage the coronavirus would be doing without government action. Even his talk last week about opening things up in May turned out to be far less than meets the eye. Trump may still hope for a miraculous recovery, but for now he appears to actually be listening to the experts. And yet he can’t quite bring himself to admit that he’s choosing the responsible policy, or to criticize anyone who supports him. So at the same time, he’s been tweeting that [he wants to “liberate” the states]( that drew the first demonstrations, and has repeatedly tried to find a way to say that he supports the protesters, even though they are, again, protesting his own policies. All of which sure seems confusing to me. The good news? Those numbers Sides reports. I’ve been extremely critical of Trump’s communications during this crisis, but most Americans seem to support the social-distancing plan — and not just with lip service, but with surprisingly high voluntary compliance. Now, perhaps that won’t always be the case going forward. But that’s what’s happening now, and a handful of small demonstrations doesn’t change it. 1. Daniel M. Thompson, Jennifer Wu, Jesse Yoder and Andrew B. Hall at the Monkey Cage with the evidence that [vote-by-mail doesn’t give either party an advantage](. 2. Matthew Dickinson with the second part of his look at Gerald Ford, the swine flu and [how presidents need to deal with experts](. 3. Julia Azari and Seth Masket at Mischiefs of Faction on [the end of the 2020 nomination fight](, Joe Biden as a nominee and more. 4. Susan Glasser on [Trump’s coronavirus reaction](. 5. And my Bloomberg Opinion colleague Francis Wilkinson on [the pandemic and the gun lobby](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.  Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](.  You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Early Returns newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.