Newsletter Subject

Still no defense secretary? That’s a scandal.

From

bloombergview.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergview.com

Sent On

Wed, May 1, 2019 10:53 AM

Email Preheader Text

We’ve hit another milestone in irresponsible government: May 1 marks four full months during wh

[BloombergOpinion]( [Early Returns]( [Jonathan Bernstein]( We’ve hit another milestone in irresponsible government: May 1 marks four full months during which the U.S. has had only an acting secretary of defense, with no one nominated for the formal position. The previous record was one day. It’s a disgrace. Or, rather, going three weeks with only an acting secretary of homeland security – as Donald Trump’s administration is also currently doing – is a disgrace. We’ve gone way beyond that at the Pentagon. But instead of talking about Trump, this time, let’s focus on the other people responsible: members of the U.S. Congress. After all, the confirmation process is one of the main ways that the Constitution empowers Congress to exert influence over the executive branch. By allowing Trump to eschew this process, the Senate is surrendering its own power. Both chambers should care about how the Defense Department is run in any event, and they know (or ought to know) that it can’t function smoothly without a confirmed secretary. I won’t give Democrats a pass on this one. They haven’t made much of a fuss about the continuing vacancies, and House Democrats haven’t taken any meaningful action on the matter. But Senate Republicans are most at fault. They’re the ones with the responsibility (since they have a majority) and the leverage. And while they’ve spoken up at times, they haven’t forced the issue. They should. The scandal-plagued president badly needs Republican senators to defend him, on everything from fighting House subpoenas to keeping his financial records secret to spinning the special counsel’s report. If Majority Leader Mitch McConnell threatened to withhold some of that support until Trump nominated secretaries for both the Defense Department and Homeland Security, you can be sure that the president would get it done promptly. And where is Armed Services Committee Chairman James Inhofe? His committee is the one that’s being undercut, after all, and he too could do something about it. I don’t expect most Senate Republicans to shut down judicial confirmations until Trump selects a nominee; that would be counterproductive, because most of them probably care a lot more about judges than Trump does. But Inhofe is supposed to oversee the Pentagon and should care about his own jurisdiction. He and the other 13 Republicans on the committee could threaten to oppose cloture on all judicial nominations until Trump sends up a suitable nominee. At which point McConnell would almost certainly be forced to threaten Trump (see above), given that all McConnell seems to really want out of this session of Congress is to confirm some more conservative judges. There are signs that Trump may finally [send up Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan as a nominee](; I don’t know what discussions are going on behind the scenes. But in assessing the behavior of Inhofe, McConnell and other Senate Republicans, it doesn’t matter: They should’ve insisted on resolving this three months ago, when a nominee was already way overdue. 1. Julia Azari at Mischiefs of Faction on [Joe Biden’s announcement message](. 2. Dan Drezner on China’s [Belt and Road initiative](. 3. Caroline Kitchener on [gender equality (or lack thereof) among top congressional staffers](. Pretty big party split here, as one might’ve guessed. 4. Dean Baker on [making single-payer health care work financially](. 5. Greg Sargent on [Trump’s make-believe, bread-and-circuses cruelty](. 6. And my Bloomberg Opinion colleague Timothy L. O'Brien on Trump’s latest attempt to prevent the public from [learning about his finances](. Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. [Click here to subscribe](hash=b9b2681361bede0e1069ca238efb1ec2). Also subscribe to [Bloomberg All Access]( and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close. Bloomberg L.P. ● 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Web]( ● [Facebook]( ● [Twitter]( [Feedback]( ● [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from bloombergview.com

View More
Sent On

21/07/2024

Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.