Newsletter Subject

5 Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day: Americas

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Mon, Feb 12, 2024 11:33 AM

Email Preheader Text

Good morning. Markets get more in line with the Fed, economists dial up the criticism and putting a

Good morning. Markets get more in line with the Fed, economists dial up the criticism and putting a number on a rough year for private equit [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Good morning. Markets get more in line with the Fed, economists dial up the criticism and putting a number on a rough year for private equity. Here’s what’s moving markets. — [David Goodman]( Traders cave to Fed “Bond traders are finally heeding one of the market’s oldest lessons: Don’t fight the Fed.” That’s the stark takeaway from a great piece from Michael Mackenzie, Liz Capo McCormick and Ye Xie today that shows how investors are (eventually) getting on board with the Federal Reserve’s cautious rhetoric on rate cuts and dialing down their exuberance on the amount of easing this year. They’ve started pricing in that the Fed will carry out just four — or five at the most — quarter-point rate cuts in 2024, only slightly more than the three penciled in by policymakers and a sharp shift from the end of last year, when futures traders were wagering on seven such moves. Economist criticism As markets (albeit reluctantly) get more in line with the Fed’s thinking, economists are [increasingly critical of the current stance.]( In a survey by the National Association for Business Economics poll published Monday, 21% of respondents considered the US central bank’s current monetary policy stance to be “too restrictive” — the most since 2011. That survey was carried out before the Fed’s latest meeting, when it signaled that the next gathering in March would be an unlikely starting point for rate cuts. Flurry of fedspeak Fed policy makers will get the chance to address both sets of market players this week, with a total of eight officials making appearances. Michelle Bowman, Tom Barkin and Neel Kashkari kick things off on Monday on an otherwise quiet day for data, although that changes tomorrow with the release of monthly CPI data. Steady markets On a trading day disrupted by Lunar New Year holidays in much of Asia, US equity futures were little changed after the S&P 500 closed above 5,000 for the first time on Friday. That move was driven by a renewed rally in big tech companies, and some of that [positive momentum]( carried over into Europe Monday, with stocks edging higher. Treasuries and the dollar were steady after wrapping up a sixth week of gains, the longest winning streak since early September. Private equity pain Private equity funds last year [returned the lowest amount of cash to their investors since the financial crisis 15 years ago](, according to a new report, hampering buyout firms in their efforts to launch new investment vehicles. Distributions to so-called limited partners totaled 11.2% of funds’ net asset value, the lowest since 2009 and well below the 25% median figure across the last 25 years, according to Raymond James Financial. “The cash flow math at the investor level is broken,” said Sunaina Sinha Haldea, global head of private capital advisory at the firm. What We’ve Been Reading This is what’s caught our eye over the past 24 hours. - Morgan Stanley spots [higher mentions of efficiency on earnings calls.]( - Germany’s[office property slump]( accelerates with record drop. - In Biden-Trump rematch, [the only sure loser is China.]( - The UK will this week learn if it [entered a recession last year.]( - Ship in Red Sea [signals all-Muslim crew]( to avoid Houthi attack. - The Chiefs won the Super Bowl, but who won the [battle of the ads](? And finally, here's what Joe’s interested in this morning If you think about the period from roughly the middle of 2021 to late 2022, it was a time of booming growth and a robust job market. But we know of course that sentiment was dismal, pretty much for everyone, from business leaders to households across the income spectrum. [Something I've been thinking about]( is that while this clearly wasn't a recession in terms of how economists think of the term, or how the NBER goes about defining one, it was like a recession in that it was for many a period of economic distress. Inflation was shooting higher. For many people, their real incomes were falling. Businesses were under extreme pressure when it came to hiring and sourcing raw materials, and so on. Meanwhile the stock market was basically dead money for two years. Anyway, people have this intuition that periods of economic pain are important in order to experience good times down the line. Maybe people have some moral reason for thinking that way. Or maybe people are just thinking about it like exercise: no pain, no gain. Or perhaps this idea comes from fasting and cleansing. Purging the rottenness out of the economy, so things can start clean and healthy. Whatever it is, it's a pretty common sentiment. Of course, pain in the short-term can be costly in the long-term. We experienced an intense recession in 2008 and 2009 and what exactly did we get for it? Our pace of housing production slowed down dramatically in a way we're still dealing with today. The labor market took years to recover. Measures of productivity were poor throughout the 2010s, so it's not like the businesses that survived the GFC were somehow better. Instead we got a grind and a slog. But maybe the most recent economic distress will bear fruit, in terms of setting us up for better long-term trends. In theory, a tight labor market is a catalyst for productivity-enhancing investments. Tight labor markets also mean many people have skills and experience they wouldn't have had otherwise. Household balance sheets are in good health. So in some sense 2021-2022 was like a recession, in the sense of widespread dissatisfaction, and material losses for many households. But the possibility is open, that from those stresses, more durable strengths can emerge. Follow Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal on X [@TheStalwart]( Like Bloomberg's Five Things? [Subscribe for unlimited access]( to trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and gain expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters, The Bloomberg Open and The Bloomberg Close. [Bloomberg Markets Wrap: The latest on what's moving global markets. Tap to read.]( Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Five Things to Start Your Day: Americas Edition newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.