Newsletter Subject

A truce between Chinese tech superpowers

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Tue, Oct 31, 2023 11:06 AM

Email Preheader Text

Hi, this is Jane in Hong Kong. As grand old Lord Palmerston of Britain once said, there are no everl

Hi, this is Jane in Hong Kong. As grand old Lord Palmerston of Britain once said, there are no everlasting friends or rivals, only interests [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Hi, this is Jane in Hong Kong. As grand old Lord Palmerston of Britain once said, there are no everlasting friends or rivals, only interests. But first... Three things you need to know today: • Samsung said the memory market [bottomed out in May]( • Apple has new, faster [Mac computers to sell]( • Russian hackers accessed over [632,000 US government emails]( Imagine Google and Meta buddying up For the better part of a decade, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. were the kingmakers of the Chinese tech world. They backed hundreds of startups between them, often deciding which lived or died, and demanded their investees feed their rival ecosystems almost exclusively. Then came the tech crackdown starting from late 2020, when Beijing made it clear fealty was owed only to the Party. The old rivalrous system began to unravel. In baby steps since, Alibaba and Tencent have been exploring the unthinkable — working together. Imagine if Meta Platforms Inc. and Google started funneling traffic and payments through each other. In some ways, that’s how stark the reversal has been. Recently, the two long-standing rivals joined hands in pouring millions into a pair of China’s up-and-coming artificial intelligence startups, Zhipu and Baichuan. Founders no longer need to pick sides, as Alibaba and Tencent appear comfortable betting on the same companies in the pursuit of accelerating and capitalizing on the huge potential of ChatGPT-like AI services. This followed an [announcement]( in September that the two giants would team up in the upcoming Singles’ Day shopping festival, Alibaba’s signature annual event that dwarfs Black Friday in size and growth. Forming an advertising alliance, Tencent’s WeChat users can now be steered to Alibaba’s Taobao shops directly — a win-win game with more ad money for Tencent and more sales volume for Alibaba. It’s an overdue collapse of artificial barriers that cost both companies money. Alibaba and Tencent used to be walled gardens — not dissimilar to Apple Inc.’s jealously guarded App Store — that tried to encroach on each other’s turf. Consumers felt it all too directly. I used to get a “warning” page on WeChat every time I clicked a Taobao link, while Alibaba for a long time excluded WeChat Pay — one of the two ubiquitous online payment methods in China — from its bevy of marketplaces and apps at the preference of Alibaba’s affiliated platform Alipay. Sellers had to deal with the same forced exclusivity, with Alibaba’s “pick one of two” terms dictating they couldn’t list on other e-commerce platforms if they used Taobao or Tmall. That triggered an antitrust probe into the company and ended with a [record fine]( of $2.8 billion in April 2021. The dismantling of this moat-building mindset has been led by the Chinese government, as it pushes for “interconnectivity” in the tech sector. Changes have trickled in over time. In 2021, WeChat first allowed users to share external links in one-on-one conversations, and later WeChat groups were allowed to [display]( links to shopping sites such as Alibaba’s Tmall and Taobao. The process is accelerating now, in part because Alibaba and Tencent appear to no longer be each other’s biggest headache. ByteDance Ltd., a true unicorn of China’s startup scene that was beholden to neither Alibaba nor Tencent, has emerged as the big growing threat to incumbents in the sector. Its Douyin short-video service, the local version of TikTok, has attracted a vast audience and, with it, huge advertising revenue. ByteDance is expanding into direct e-commerce and thus stepping on both behemoths’ toes. Alibaba’s historic six-way corporate split is helping. Each so-called Baby Baba is responsible for its own profit and loss and is less concerned with ecosystem-wide competitive plays. If it makes economic sense to work with some supplier outside the Alibaba sphere, that’s the path they’ll pursue, and it’s already happening. The clashes of yesteryear are neither favored by the government nor economically viable anymore. In difficult times, the two titans are huddling to navigate a weak economic recovery and increasingly fierce competition. Tencent would rather focus on fighting off ByteDance in arenas like video games, while Alibaba focuses on a low-price strategy in an attempt to reclaim the ground lost to PDD Holdings Ltd. and platforms like Douyin. For China’s biggest internet companies, embracing a new era of slower growth has meant also embracing one another. —[Jane Zhang](mailto:hzhang901@bloomberg.net) The big story Regulating AI raises legal, national security and civil rights concerns. So, [what would regulation look like in the US](? Get fully charged The iPhone 15 models had a [6% sales decline in China](, a sign that Apple is losing customers to Huawei. Google’s CEO was grilled in the company’s antitrust trial over a [company policy to copy lawyers]( in on unnecessary emails and have sensitive conversations with the chat history function turned off. Broadcom is confident the VMware deal will move forward despite [not having an update from Chinese regulators](. More from Bloomberg Get Bloomberg Tech weeklies in your inbox: - [Cyber Bulletin]( for coverage of the shadow world of hackers and cyber-espionage - [Game On]( for reporting on the video game business - [Power On]( for Apple scoops, consumer tech news and more - [Screentime]( for a front-row seat to the collision of Hollywood and Silicon Valley - [Soundbite]( for reporting on podcasting, the music industry and audio trends - [Q&AI]( for answers to all your questions about AI Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Tech Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.