Newsletter Subject

5 Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 3, 2023 10:34 AM

Email Preheader Text

Oil soars after a surprise output cut by OPEC+, the UBS-Credit Suisse deal sparks speculation over j

Oil soars after a surprise output cut by OPEC+, the UBS-Credit Suisse deal sparks speculation over job losses and high-end travelers cut bac [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Oil soars after a surprise output cut by OPEC+, the UBS-Credit Suisse deal sparks speculation over job losses and high-end travelers cut back on vacation spending. — [Kristine Aquino]( Note: We want your feedback. Please take a few minutes to[fill out a survey](on how we can make this newsletter better. Thank you. OPEC+ shock Oil surged more than 8% at one point on Monday after [OPEC+ announced a surprise oil production cut]( of more than 1 million barrels a day. The group abandoned previous assurances that it would hold supply steady, prompting analysts to warn that the move could [accelerate Brent crude’s return to $100](, a level last seen in June. “OPEC+ clearly want a higher price,” said Gary Ross, a veteran oil consultant turned hedge fund manager at Black Gold Investors. The move comes just as US President Joe Biden is expected to launch his re-election campaign, giving him a[limited range of options with which to respond](. Job cuts [UBS’s takeover of Credit Suisse may result in up to 30% of the workforce being cut](, Swiss newspaper SonntagsZeitung reported, citing an unidentified senior manager at UBS. As many as 11,000 employees will be laid off in Switzerland, and another 25,000 worldwide, the newspaper said. Separately, Switzerland’s Office of the Attorney General said on Sunday it was working to identify possible crimes linked to the takeover, without specifying further what it was looking for. The top federal prosecutor ordered national and regional authorities to investigate, according to a statement. Vacation blues [Even high-end travelers are pulling back on their vacation spending](, saying they want to pay no more than $500 a night for a hotel — that’s according to the latest MLIV Pulse survey with 465 respondents, a little more than half from the US and Canada and a quarter from Europe. Only 7% said they will be “splashing out” on their next vacation. As for the rest of the travel sector, more than half of professional investors said negative economic factors, such as a recession, will undermine airline stocks in the next 12 months. Retail investors were more optimistic, with 60% predicting positive momentum in the sector. Futures fall S&P 500 futures dropped 0.1% as of 5:18 a.m. in New York, while Nasdaq 100 contracts slid 0.6%. The Bloomberg Dollar Index retreated from its earlier highs, lifting most Group-of-10 currencies. Treasury yields climbed across the board as the surprise cut from OPEC+ stoked inflation concerns. Gold fell and Bitcoin climbed nearly 1%. Coming up… At 9:45 a.m., we’ll get data on S&P Global’s manufacturing gauge, while figures for a similar measure by ISM are due at 10 a.m. Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook will discusses the U.S. economic outlook and monetary policy at an event at 4:15 p.m. What we’ve been reading Here’s what caught our eye over the weekend: - [Soaring energy stocks]( turn the UK equity market into a winner - [Bitcoin liquidity is drying up]( as crypto `tourists’ flee - [A bank run collides with the tech slump]( to batter San Francisco - [Tesla’s record deliveries fall short]( of pace needed for 50% annual growth - [New York Times loses Twitter verified badge]( after it refused to pay - [Indian billionaire blocked from his palace]( blasts `socialist’ government - Remembering the [mobile phone inventor’s first call 50 years ago]( And finally, here’s what Joe’s interested in this morning Monetary policy is a blunt instrument for fighting inflation. It impacts some sectors disproportionately. It works the same, whether the inflation is related to supply shocks or demand shocks. It's non-linear. One moment the unemployment rate is low and inflation is high and then the next moment one of the biggest banks in the country fails, in part due to losses on its bond portfolio. Unfortunately, for all the well-understood problems with relying on monetary policy, it's the main thing we've got to work with. Policymakers don't have a ton of dials to turn. Nimble and targeted counter-cyclical fiscal policy (raising taxes in a boom, cutting them in a slump) would be nice, but the politics of taxes make that tough. We don't have an independent Fed-like entity that could adjust, say, payroll taxes unliterally. So monetary policy is what we're stuck with for now. Well, for the most part. Last year, the The White House introduced a potentially powerful new tool, with its decision to sell down oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, while simultaneously announcing its commitment to buy back that oil at lower prices in the future. The logic was simple and elegant. Spot oil prices were high, yet domestic producers were slow to ramp up production thanks to an uncertain demand future. By providing a purchase commitment (at least in theory) The White House was in a position to lower the price of oil in the short term, while avoiding crushing domestic operators. Anyway. That was the theory. The Biden administration executed half of what could have been (perhaps could still be?) one of the greatest oil trades of all time, selling oil around the peak last year. Since then the oil price has plunged. But when it came time to completing the other half of the trade (buying low), the DOE has been MIA. [Here's Liam Denning]( on the failure to complete the trade from March. [Here's Skanda Amarnath and Arnab Datta from Employ America]( (which helped formulate the original idea) talking about the DOE whiffing on the moment. They write: "Unfortunately, the Department of Energy (DOE) has yet to show any indication that it is prepared to give credible effect to the President’s commitment, with Secretary Granholm providing underwhelming excuses about logistical constraints. Oil prices may have exited the refill range on their own, but the DOE does not seem to have a serious strategy for dealing with the scenario in which oil prices fall sharply or durably below $72. Unless clearer guidance and processes are provided, market and industry participants are more likely to treat the President’s commitments with less credibility, thereby undermining its potential stabilizing effect." Now, of course, oil prices are jumping again because of a [surprise production cut announcement]( over the weekend from OPEC. We don't know the medium-term effect of the cuts, but their existence to some extent speaks to the White House's blown opportunity. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve has the potential at least to be a powerful, counter-cyclical stabilizer that reduces the need for the Fed to do everything on the inflation front. But this is a novel use. And for the SPR to work in this way, it has to have some credibility that its gears can turn in both directions. It needs to be able to boost the price of oil in a slump (by being a buyer of last resort) and it needs to be able to lower the price of oil in a boom (by being a net seller). A pattern of this would bolster domestic industry and provide stability at the pump. The US is the world's largest producer of oil, but unlike the big OPEC players, there's no national oil company. We have no real policy tool for just announcing a cut or hike in a domestic output. And now by failing to build out the SPR mechanism, it looks like despite our size in this industry, we're still outsourcing energy market stabilization to OPEC. Follow Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal on Twitter [@TheStalwart](. Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Five Things to Start Your Day: Americas Edition newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

14/06/2024

Sent On

14/06/2024

Sent On

14/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.