Newsletter Subject

Will AI kill us all?

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Wed, Mar 8, 2023 11:48 AM

Email Preheader Text

Hi everyone, it’s Ellen Huet in San Francisco. Is artificial intelligence going to catapult hum

Hi everyone, it’s Ellen Huet in San Francisco. Is artificial intelligence going to catapult humanity into heaven — or hell? But first...Toda [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Hi everyone, it’s Ellen Huet in San Francisco. Is artificial intelligence going to catapult humanity into heaven — or hell? But first... Today’s must-reads: • A new US bill could [ban]( TikTok • Amazon [defeats]( an employee class action suit • Elon Musk said Twitter [might stop]( losing money The great AI beef As the tech industry marches toward ever more dazzling artificial intelligence technology, there’s one unavoidable question for humanity: Is this good news, or bad news? In Silicon Valley, there’s a small but powerful group of people who believe it could be very, very bad news — and that AI, if not handled correctly, could wipe out humanity within a couple decades. There’s also a crowd who thinks our AI future will be amazing — bringing about untold future capabilities, abundance and utopia. This week in a [feature for Bloomberg Businessweek](, I dive into the faction of the tech industry that believes it’s scrambling to save the world from a killer. The saga involves the marriage of the charitable philosophy called effective altruism and AI doomerism, and features Sam Bankman-Fried, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and, believe it or not, Harry Potter. It also has an unsavory underbelly — allegations of sexual abuse and whiffs of an apocalyptic doomsday religion. In the last few years, Silicon Valley’s obsession with the astronomical stakes of future AI has curdled into a bitter feud. And right now, that schism is playing out online between two people: AI theorist Eliezer Yudkowsky and OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman. Since the early 2000s, Yudkowsky has been sounding the alarm that artificial general intelligence is likely to be “unaligned” with human values and could decide to wipe us out. He worked aggressively to get others to adopt the prevention of AI apocalypse as a priority — enough that he helped convince Musk to take the risk seriously. Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit with Altman in 2015, with the goal of creating safer AI. In the last few years, OpenAI has adopted a for-profit model and churned out bigger, faster, and more advanced AI technology. The company has raised billions in investment, and Altman has cheered on the progress toward artificial general intelligence, or AGI. “There will be scary moments as we move towards AGI-level systems, and significant disruptions, but the upsides can be so amazing that it’s well worth overcoming the great challenges to get there,” he [tweeted]( in December. Yudkowsky, meanwhile, has lost nearly all hope that humanity will handle AI responsibly, he said on a [podcast]( last month. After the creation of OpenAI, with its commitment to advancing AI development, he said he cried by himself late at night and thought, “Oh, so this is what humanity will elect to do. We will not rise above. We will not have more grace, not even here at the very end.” Given that background, it certainly seemed like rubbing salt in a wound when Altman [tweeted]( recently that Yudkowsky had “done more to accelerate AGI than anyone else” and might someday “deserve the Nobel Peace Prize” for his work. Read a certain way, he was trolling Yudkowsky, saying the AI theorist had, in trying to prevent his most catastrophic fear, significantly hastened its arrival. (Yudkowsky said he could not know if Altman was trolling him; Altman declined to comment.) There you have it. A somewhat inscrutable, inside-baseball catfight between two AI thinkers — but it highlights the all-or-nothing, salvation-or-damnation context underlying much of the AI news you’ll see these days. Then again, maybe the beef isn’t as beefy as we think. Last month, Altman tweeted a [selfie]( in which he posed flanked by Yudkowsky on one side, and Elon Musk’s former partner, Canadian singer Grimes, on the other. So whether AI will kill us all in 20 years or not, at least for now, everyone can still hang out together at parties. —[Ellen Huet](mailto:ehuet4@bloomberg.net) The big story Intel has embarked on a massive build-out of new production in Germany to help rebalance the concentration of east Asian manufacturing, but bad economic conditions have forced the chip giant to postpone construction of its Magdeburg plant as it [seeks additional German government subsidies](. Get fully charged The implosion of FTX has exposed how many digital-asset platforms lack insurance, and [the long road that lies ahead to rebuilding trust in the crypto industry](. Salesforce launched a $250 million fund for generative AI startups — its largest to date — [as the software giant tries to get into the AI game](. South Korea’s rocket scientists have turned to a simple internet search service to find an engine they could mimic [as the country tries to build out a space program](. WeWork, the long-struggling workspace rental company, is in talks to raise [hundreds of millions in cash](. More from Bloomberg Listen: [Foundering: The John McAfee Story]( is a new six-part podcast series retracing the life, the myths and the self-destruction of a Silicon Valley icon. Subscribe for free on [Apple](, [Spotify]( or wherever you get your podcasts. Watch: [The Future With Hannah Fry]( explores the potential of life extension, emotionally sensitive computers and more in this Bloomberg Originals show. Get Bloomberg Tech weeklies in your inbox: - [Cyber Bulletin]( for coverage of the shadow world of hackers and cyber-espionage - [Game On]( for reporting on the video game business - [Power On]( for Apple scoops, consumer tech news and more - [Screentime]( for a front-row seat to the collision of Hollywood and Silicon Valley - [Soundbite]( for reporting on podcasting, the music industry and audio trends Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Bloomberg Tech Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.