Newsletter Subject

The new Bing vs. the future Google

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Tue, Feb 28, 2023 12:05 PM

Email Preheader Text

Hi, it’s Dina in Seattle and Davey in New York. Don’t entrust Bing or Google’s chatbo

Hi, it’s Dina in Seattle and Davey in New York. Don’t entrust Bing or Google’s chatbot with finding a lost dog. But first…Today’s must-reads [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Hi, it’s Dina in Seattle and Davey in New York. Don’t entrust Bing or Google’s chatbot with finding a lost dog. But first… Today’s must-reads: • Google contract workers [won raises]( • Chipmakers receiving US funding [must provide child care]( • Snap [debuted an AI-powered chatbot]( Working like a dog For an illustration of how far chatbots still have to go before they can be relied on to answer even the most basic questions, ask Microsoft Corp. or Google’s artificial intelligence what to do when a dog gets separated from his owner. Microsoft’s Bing offered some sound advice but on an entirely different topic. It thought we were asking about separation anxiety and delivered a thorough answer, including possible signs a dog is suffering from the condition, common causes and some suggestions for easing a pup’s loneliness. Google, meanwhile, suggested that if a dog were separated from its owner, it could remember its telephone number and phone home. Perhaps the chatbot was trained on too many viewings of the movie ET? This month’s introduction of [Bing with a new ChatGPT-like feature]( showed exciting potential but also exposed deep flaws. The companies are aware the machines are imperfect. Microsoft [took steps to limit]( what sorts of conversations the chatbot would engage in and is taking a deliberately slow approach to welcoming people off the waitlist. [Google’s Bard chatbot]( isn’t even available to the public yet. Google did, however, allow a Bloomberg reporter to spend time with a tool called LaMDA Test Kitchen, which helps demonstrate the technology on which Bard’s AI is based. It won’t settle the question of whether Bing or Google’s chatbot is better. Google’s demo only does three things: generate lists, “imagine” scenarios and have conversations about dogs. The list function in Google’s Test Kitchen starts every query with “I want to...” We filled in “learn more about the new Bing search.” It wasn’t having it. It generated a list that included “search for a new recipe,” “search for a new hobby” and “try a new search engine.” Bing, when asked about its chief rival, gave a coherent, accurate and objective answer, though it was partially lifted straight from Google’s corporate blog and appeared to border on plagiarism. Another part of the Google demo lets users enter a phrase that starts with “Imagine I’m at...” (We typed “my computer chatting with the new AI-powered chatbot Bard.”) Among Google’s suggestions were to use Bard to find a therapist and get advice using its “decision making algorithms” — both situations we wouldn’t rely solely on a chatbot for and certainly not in their current state. There’s only one scenario in which the Test Kitchen will engage with the user in a freewheeling conversation similar to Bing. In that scenario, the chatbot pretends it’s a tennis ball extremely fond of talking about dogs. It’s hard to get much of it, other than the hypothetical example of the exceptionally intelligent lost dog. Google and Microsoft have said they have a lot more work to do to make their AIs more reliable. Google at least has the luxury of doing that largely outside of the public eye while Microsoft soaks up the attention and the criticism. We’re not sure which strategy will be better in the end, and the chatbots didn’t seem to know, either. —[Dina Bass](mailto:dbass2@bloomberg.net) and [Davey Alba](mailto:malba13@bloomberg.net) The big story Meta funded a tool to help minors remove nude or sexually explicit images of themselves from the internet as big tech companies come under [increasing pressure from US lawmakers]( to better protect children online. Get fully charged Tesla temporarily stalled the rollout of its $15,000 driver-assistance software as it [addresses issues that led to a recall]( of almost 363,000 of its vehicles. Ford’s battery supplier insisted that the defect that led to a fire in an electric F-150 Lightning is “rare” and [not a fundamental issue with its technology](. A senior US cybersecurity official described Microsoft and Twitter’s [security protocols as “disappointing.”]( Chinese media regulators are exploring methods to curb what they see as young people’s [“excessive” addiction to short videos]( of the kind popularized by TikTok’s parent company and by Tencent. More from Bloomberg Listen: [Foundering: The John McAfee Story]( is a new six-part podcast series retracing the life, the myths and the self-destruction of a Silicon Valley icon. Subscribe for free on [Apple](, [Spotify]( or wherever you get your podcasts. Get Bloomberg Tech weeklies in your inbox: - [Power On]( for Apple scoops, consumer tech news and more - [Cyber Bulletin]( for coverage of the shadow world of hackers and cyber-espionage - [Soundbite]( for reporting on podcasting, the music industry and audio trends - [Game On]( for reporting on the video game business - [Screentime]( for a front-row seat to the collision of Hollywood and Silicon Valley Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Bloomberg Tech Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.