Newsletter Subject

5 Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Wed, Jun 1, 2022 10:49 AM

Email Preheader Text

Inflation, Ukraine military aid, OPEC+, and the Fed’s balance sheet. InflationTreasury Secretar

Inflation, Ukraine military aid, OPEC+, and the Fed’s balance sheet. InflationTreasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted Tuesday that she had [View in browser]( [Bloomberg]( Inflation, Ukraine military aid, OPEC+, and the Fed’s balance sheet.  Inflation Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen [admitted]( Tuesday that she had been wrong last year in saying that inflation wouldn't pose a continuing problem. "I didn't fully understand" the unanticipated and large shocks stemming from supply bottlenecks, she told CNN. Meanwhile, Fed Atlanta President Raphael Bostic said his [suggestion]( last week that the central bank take a September “pause” from raising interest rates shouldn't be construed as a “Fed put,” or belief that the central bank would come to the rescue of markets. Ukraine strategy President Joe Biden said [he’ll give Ukraine]( advanced rocket systems and other US weaponry to better hit targets in its war with Russia, ramping up [military support]( as the conflict drags into its fourth month. The package of weapons includes missiles that will allow Ukraine to strike locations as far as 80 kilometers away. World leaders including British Prime Minister Boris Johnson have publicly called for such a move in recent weeks. OPEC+ To the many reverberations from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, another might be an early end to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies’ oil [supply pact](. The 23-nation alliance, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, is due to finish restoring production halted during the pandemic by the end of September. The Wall Street Journal [reported on Tuesday]( that OPEC is contemplating suspending Russia from the coalition’s quota system, as sanctions prevent Moscow from increasing output. The Saudis and the United Arab Emirates might fill the resulting supply gap, the WSJ said. Fed’s balance sheet The Japanese yen is getting closer to 130 per dollar, as [Treasury yields rise]( and the interest-rate differential between the US and Japan widens. This is combined with the plan to start shrinking the Federal Reserve balance sheet this month. An initial balance sheet run-off of $47.5 billion per month, and more Fed rate hikes ahead, make a compelling case for more yen weakness. In one corner of the market there's [some evidence]( of dip-buyers in long dated Treasuries; whether that's part of a longer-term investment to pick up bonds offering a more generous yield, or alternatively a higher conviction that the bond market may recover from its significantly oversold status, is very much up for debate. Coming up... The 9:45 a.m. Manufacturing PMI and 10 a.m. ISM Manufacturing releases for May are today's data highlights. We also get the MBA Mortgage Applications at 7 a.m. and the JOLTS Job Openings at 10 a.m. The Bank of Canada will announce their latest rate decision at 10 a.m., with a 50 basis point hike on the cards. Fedspeak includes John Williams, who will deliver opening remarks at an event on Monetary Policy Implementation at 11:30 a.m., with James Bullard set to discuss the economic and policy outlook at 1 p.m. The Fed's Beige Book will cross the wires at 2 p.m. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and NetApp Inc. are among the companies scheduled to report earnings. What we've been reading Here's what caught our eye over the past 24 hours. - Yellen admits she was [wrong on inflation](. - Elon Musk isn't a fan of [work-from-home]( culture. - The world is paying for [Putin's war](. - Back to the future in an [electric DeLorean](. - Saudi Arabia’s [oil whisperer]( spills secrets. - A summer of [flight cancellations](. - ...and [popcorn shortages]( ruin the flicks. And finally, here’s what Joe’s interested in this morning One of the striking things about the tech downturn is that for the most part, it doesn't even seem to be about deteriorating fundamentals. The main thing that's going on, particularly on the private market side, is that VCs are telling their portfolio companies that access to future financing is far from guaranteed. And so all of these companies that produce no profit or free cash flow are facing an existential threat unless they can get to profitability soon. But anyway, I'll get back to that in a moment. [According to Bloomberg analysis](, there are 620 companies in the Russell 3000 that haven't earned enough income over the last 12 months to even pay their interest expenses. These companies often get referred to as "zombie companies" because the assumption is that they're basically only half alive, propped up by easy liquidity and loose money. There's always a lot of concern about the proliferation of these so-called zombies. But how come? Well presumably if a company can't even pay the interest on its debt, then it's not going to be viable as a real business without cheap money, and so presumably its resources could be better used elsewhere in the world. The proliferation of the zombies is seen as a threat to productivity, since the idea is that all of these assets would be better used by a company with real operations and a sound business model. You never hear about fast-growing tech companies referred to as zombies. But I think we should start referring to them as such for two reasons. 1) It's clear that a lot of these companies only exist due to abundant investment capital. Sure, most of these companies are financed by equity rounds, as opposed to debt, but that doesn't change much. They exist because of outside cash, and when the outside cash starts to dry up, they're suddenly thrust into crisis. 2) Unlike many of the standard-issue zombies, many of these startups really have been hoarding an extremely scarce resource: talent. Tech startups, and most recently crypto, have been this huge magnet for talent over the last decade. Employees in these industries have often made a fortune, despite working for companies that weren't able to turn a profit or even generate surplus value for the public. This has come with a cost. As Goldman's [top metals strategist]( Nick Snowdon told us in a recent interview, one bottleneck to new mining projects is simply the lack of people who know how to build a mine. There's a shortage of mine engineers. And of course, that should surprise nobody. Over the last decade, how many smart, ambitious people went into resource extraction? Fast tech money was sitting right there for the taking. Now of course, we're facing huge deficits in key commodities (like copper) and though there are many reasons for it, one factor is the lack of fresh blood in the space. And it's not just about building new mines, but also improving the technology to make copper extraction faster, and more cost efficient. These things don't improve overnight. It would have been very nice, in retrospect, for the best and the brightest to be working on some of these problems over the last decade, instead of trying to get an algorithmic stablecoin to work If there is an upside to the tech wreck, then perhaps we could see the migration of talent move away from VC-funded money losers to working on some of the biggest challenges of our time. We can hope, anyway. Follow Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal on Twitter [@TheStalwart]( Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. [Learn more](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Five Things - Americas newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox. [Unsubscribe]( [Bloomberg.com]( [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.