Newsletter Subject

The outrage bandwagon

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 23, 2017 08:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

From Hi, it's . I'm sure you've read Bloomberg's of the of Google ads over advertisements sponsoring

[Bloomberg] [Fully Charged]( From [Bloomberg]( [FOLLOW US [Facebook Share]]([Twitter Share]( [SUBSCRIBE [Subscribe]]( Hi, it's [Shira](mailto:sovide@bloomberg.net?cmpid=BBD032317_TECH&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=170323&utm_campaign=tech). I'm sure you've read Bloomberg's [excellent]( [coverage]( of the [semi-boycott]( of Google ads over advertisements sponsoring offensive YouTube videos. Google is no stranger to controversy about the quality of the content or ads it serves, but this latest tempest exposes a deep problem. This is what happens when Google, Facebook and the whole industry allow longstanding flaws with digital advertising to fester. Ads running next to horrible or faked content, bogus measurement of ad views, creepy collection of personal information or downright annoying ads have been a problem for as long as the web has existed. Remember those pop-up mortgage ads from the 1990s? (Or am I too old?) Ok, so few L'Oreal ads next to anti-Semitic videos is nothing new. And cynically, there is little to lose for advertisers pulling money from Google. They haven't stopped spending on Google's web search ads, which could have an immediate hit to their sales. With safety in numbers, they can try to squeeze concessions or discounts from Google. But there are three reasons not to dismiss the outrage bandwagon. - The gripes this time aren't coming from regulators, privacy groups, competitors or other longstanding Google critics. They're coming from the advertisers who pay the bills. Google parent company Alphabet generates 88 percent of its annual revenue from ads. - Digital advertising's longstanding problems aren't getting better. Newly published [research]( by a group of marketing firms found nearly 20 percent of digital ads were bogus—that is, not seen by humans, or purposefully invisible on websites and apps. That's a lot of wasted ad spending. Again, bogus ads are a [perennial problem](, but they've been tolerated for too long. - Advertising online is no longer a niche activity where some kinks can be tolerated. This year, internet ads are forecast to surpass TV commercials as the world's largest advertising category, according to Magna Global. The big risk for Google and Facebook is that this week's headlines will embolden advertisers to take a second look at whether their digital ad budgets are as effective as they believe. They might not like what they find. Marketing firm Adobe this week [said]( the costs of digital advertising were growing more quickly than the cost of TV ads, and that the growth in spending on Web search ads isn't resulting in a commensurate increase in visits to the advertisers' websites. That echoes the disillusionment [expressed]( by an executive at Procter & Gamble—the world's biggest buyer of advertisements—who said big companies aren't seeing fast enough sales growth to justify the $500 billion spent annually on advertisements. My Bloomberg Gadfly colleague Leila Abboud [wrote this week](about fixes Google should have made long ago, such as allowing independent software to verify where ad campaigns run, and to measure the effectiveness of those ads. There's no time like the present, Google. Do it before the outrage cycle breaks the spell of digital advertising altogether. And here's what you need to know in global technology news First Lloyd’s of London [insured movie stars’ legs](. Now it’s gunning for people who sell vitamins on Amazon. Lloyd’s is underwriting insurance [to cover lost income for Amazon marketplace sellers]( who get booted off the site. A gathering of Samsung shareholders is [sure to be dominated by the legal charges]( against its de facto CEO. Jay Y. Lee was jailed in connection with Samsung’s alleged role in a national influence-peddling scandal that brought down South Korea’s president. Tencent is the latest Chinese technology superpower to [bet big on artificial intelligence]( to stay ahead in the country’s fiercely competitive tech industry. Being irked by constant LinkedIn updates and spam is a rite of professional life. Now LinkedIn wants to annoy you with something new, “[trending storylines](.” It’s very, very, very hard to be a financially successful digital music service. Related: SoundCloud just [borrowed]( $70 million. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Bloomberg Technology newsletter Fully Charged. You can tell your friends to [sign up here](. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.