Newsletter Subject

Just how dominant is Facebook?

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Thu, Jul 1, 2021 01:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us Hey all, it’s Kurt.A judge dismissed the U.S. government's lawsuit against Facebook I

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us [Get the newsletter]( Hey all, it’s Kurt.A judge dismissed the U.S. government's lawsuit against Facebook Inc.’s monopoly tactics this week, and his reasoning was pretty simple: Regulators failed to prove, with data, that Facebook has a dominant share of the social networking market. The Federal Trade Commission’s “inability to offer any indication of the metric(s) or method(s) it used to calculate Facebook’s market share” makes its argument “too speculative and conclusory to go forward,” U.S. District Judge James Boasberg [wrote in an opinion](. The FTC can resubmit its lawsuit over the next 30 days, he added, but I’m not sure it will matter. Proving Facebook’s popularity is easy. But proving that Facebook’s popularity is monopolistic, or represents a dominant market share, might be impossible. Defining the social networking market, and then finding the right metric to measure it, are both really difficult. What is “social networking” in 2021? It’s tough to say because the idea of social media has expanded tremendously since Facebook’s creation way back in 2004. “The whole definition of social media is a snake pit,” said Lee Rainie, who studies internet and technology at Pew Research Center. Facebook offers social networking, but it also offers video entertainment, shopping, games and private chats, making it difficult to identify a clear market the company dominates. Rainie knows from his research that consumers, too, don’t always agree on what constitutes as “social networking.” It’s hard to blame them. In Apple Inc.’s App Store, TikTok is nestled under the “entertainment” category, while Twitter self-identifies as “news.” Google’s YouTube, which reaches even more U.S. adults than Facebook, according to [data from Pew](, falls under the “photo and video” category, as does Snapchat. While none of these apps are “social networking,” Facebook competes with all of them for our attention. Even if regulators could categorize exactly where Facebook operates, measuring its market dominance is nearly impossible under the current system. Consumer technology companies have always defined and self-reported their growth metrics. “There is no common standard,” Rainie said. “It’s sort of the Wild West for different measurement schemes.” Most companies report their overall user numbers, but there is no way to know how many people use multiple services. A [study]( from App Annie from December 2020, which was commissioned by Facebook, found that 90% of the people who use one of Facebook’s apps also use YouTube, and 25% also use Twitter. Other metrics that might be useful for determining market dominance—like minutes spent on the apps or total user interactions—are not regularly reported. Facebook doesn’t even report its total users for Instagram, WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger anymore. When it does report its U.S. user base, it includes Canadian users in the metric as well. Twitter, meanwhile, reports its U.S. users as a separate number, while Snapchat reports a broader “North America” category. They are essentially impossible to compare. Perhaps the next step in this process should be a national measurement standard, with companies forced to report metrics under the same general rules and guidelines. Of course, that would take much longer than 30 days, but at least it would begin to capture Facebook’s power. In the meantime, the FTC has to invent something. “The agency may be able to ‘cure [these] deficiencies,’” Boasberg wrote of the lawsuit. “Whether and how the agency chooses to do so is up to it.” —[Kurt Wagner](mailto:kwagner71@bloomberg.net) If you read one thing Amazon would like famed Amazon critic and Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan to recuse herself from matters [involving the company]( because of her past statements as a scholar. The request was an atypical one to make of a former academic, but Amazon has reason to be worried. And here’s what you need to know in global technology news Google and Microsoft’s rivalry is escalating again after a [five-year-long detente](. Now, their feud could add to the industry’s antitrust woes. Twitter dives into NFTs. The company is planning to [give away 140 of them](. Uber lost out to local rival Didi in China, but it just [made more than $8 billion]( on the initial public offering of its one-time foe. TikTok, the social network beloved by teens, said it [removed more than 7 million accounts]( belonging to children under 13 years old. More from Bloomberg It’s time to Power On. A new weekly newsletter by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman delivers Apple scoops, consumer tech news, product reviews and the occasional basketball take. [Sign up to get Power On]( in your inbox on Sundays.  Like Fully Charged? | [Get unlimited access to Bloomberg.com](, where you'll find trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Fully Charged newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.